Posted on 05/05/2007 10:38:43 PM PDT by Kaslin
Real profound....can I have your autograph?
You are like sixth graders.
“Rudy is an American hero for his actions on 9/11 and the days that followed to call him a POS reflects poorly on you”
Please tell me ONE THING Rudy did after 9/11 that was heroic....Just ONE thing!
You are supposed to be 53 years old, yet when you have a minor disagreement, you ping Jim and the mods. It makes you look foolish, like you are a fourteen year old running to tattletale on someone to the teacher. It is pretty pathetic.
I am sick of your childish, puerile defence of Rudy, who is a quintessential WHORE, a liar, and a power hungry dolt.
OKAY?
Helped his city heal from the worst loss of human life from a terrorist attack on U.S. soil. You must not own a television or a radio because anyone with those could see the heroic actions and heart felt assistance he gave to the citizens of his city.
“Helped his city heal from the worst loss of human life from a terrorist attack on U.S. soil. You must not own a television or a radio because anyone with those could see the heroic actions and heart felt assistance he gave to the citizens of his city.”
By doing WHAT? Name ONE thing Rudy did other than 72 photo opps, in 72 hours!!!!
Excuse me , but you not only avoided my question, you pretended you never read it : )
My brother lived in NY before and during the Rudy years, and he is in absolute awe of what Rudy accomplished while continually dealing with a hostile MSM and a rabid hostile democrat government.
Rudy is a doer and will get more accomplished than all the rest of the candidates combined.
I see by your tag line that you support a Hunter/Thompson or Thompson/Hunter ticket. As you can see by my tag line, I also support Fred Thompson. I myself could go with a Thomson/Hunter ticket should Thompson jump in the race and get the nomination. But then I also like a Thompson/Romney ticket or vice versa. The only three who will definitely not get my vote are McCain, for many reasons. Ron Paul, for throwing the thread of terrorism down to the side as if it weren’t important. And finally Tom Tancredo. He reminds me to much of Buchanan.
***** Rudy is an American hero for his actions on 9/11 and the days that followed *****
Take you meds.
**** to call him a POS reflects poorly on you. ****
Okay... how about: 'egomaniacal authoritarian lisping leftist cross dressing nancy boy Draft Dodger'???
Nah too long.. POS is shorter and more to the point.
Last Word: Stephenjohnbanker’s posts wins in the categories of style and content.
You are correct of course
Reagan always wanted to bring Canada and Mexico closer to us for Cold War reasons. His reasons for Amnesty seemed to be different than W’s, even so I think afterwards Reagan considered it a mistake. There has been no greater BS artist on the issue than W. “Doing the jobs Americans won’t do” and “Family values don’t stop south of the Rio Grande.” He’s full of it. Some of us will remember him as caring more for illegal Mexicans than American citizens.
Illegal Alien Gangs Battle on Fla. Beaches
Posted by stephenjohnbanker to Dick Bachert; All On News/Activism 05/05/2007 6:08:30 PM CDT · 78 of 88
Many estimate that as many as 15 million illegals came in here just in the past 2 years. That would bring the total to closer to 30,000,000.
Where did you come up with that number, and give some names of those that estimate the numbers having doubled in just 2 years, or did you just pull them out of yor head?
Actually, it's not "only natural." It's immature and obnoxious.
Stick to facts and stick to the topic. It gets very old to see smearing of any candidate or politician regardless of the topic simply because that person isn't your candidate or disagrees with you on your pet issue.
For instance, Giuliani does not have my vote for Republican candidate for POTUS; however, I can acknowledge that the man has some good points. I do like much of how he handled the aftermath of 9/11 and I will always give him credit for telling that Arab Prince what he could do with his $10 million. I will NOT smear him simply because I do not wish him to become the Republican nominee. I WILL give credit where it is due and when the discussion revolves around Rudy's stance on abortion, I will voice my strong disagreement with him there.
As for GWB, there could never possibly be any POTUS with whom any person consistently agrees with 100% of the time, so when the topic is whatever issue you disagree with, by all means, voice your concern, but to smear a good man because you disagree with him on immigration is wrong.
BTW, my use of the word "you" is in the generic sense, not directed personally at you. It is directed in general to the many posters here who do not seem to be capable of making a distinction between one issue and every other issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.