Posted on 05/06/2007 4:57:37 AM PDT by circumbendibus
May. 06, 2007 Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal
STATEWIDE POLL: Clinton has huge lead in Nevada
No clear-cut front-runner among Republican hopefuls
By MOLLY BALL REVIEW-JOURNAL Review-Journal Polls
Nevada Democrats want Hillary Clinton to be their presidential nominee, while the Republican field is practically a four-way tie, according to a new Review-Journal poll of partisans who say they will participate in the state's nominating contests next year.
John McCain held a slim lead on the Republican side with just 19 percent of the vote. But Mitt Romney (15 percent), Fred Thompson (13 percent) and Rudy Giuliani (12 percent) were all close behind.
Clinton would get 37 percent of the vote if a Democratic caucus were held today, holding a healthy lead over John Edwards (13 percent) and Barack Obama (12 percent), according to the poll.
"Hillary is the clear front-runner on the Democratic side," said Brad Coker, managing partner of Mason-Dixon Polling & Research Inc., which conducted the survey. "The Republican race is just wide open. There's no clear favorite."
The poll, conducted Monday to Wednesday statewide, surveyed Republican and Democratic partisans who said they planned to participate in the 2008 presidential nominating caucuses. Three hundred voters were surveyed on each side. The poll carries a margin of error of plus or minus 6 percentage points.
At this point, eight months before the contests that will help determine the nominees, such numbers are highly preliminary and can't be considered predictive, Coker noted.
But they serve as a benchmark against which to measure candidates' movement up or down in future polls. And given Nevada's new status hosting second-in-the-nation nominating caucuses on both the Democratic and Republican sides, polls here will be closely watched, he said.
On the Democratic side, Clinton has a more formidable lead in Nevada than in most national polls, many of which have shown Obama creeping up on the New York senator. For example, an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll in late April put Clinton at 36 percent, Obama at 31 percent and Edwards at 20 percent.
That may reflect the fact that Obama has made few trips to Nevada and hasn't seemed to focus on the state, said University of Nevada, Reno, political scientist Eric Herzik.
Obama traveled to Las Vegas in February and March, but he has not been to Northern Nevada. Clinton and Edwards have both made multiple trips to Northern and Southern Nevada, most recently last weekend.
Clinton also boasts the support of influential Nevada figures including Clark County Commission Chairman Rory Reid and former Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa.
"Hillary Clinton was the favorite going in, and she's done nothing to hurt herself, particularly in Nevada," Herzik said. "She's been here a few times, and she has a strong organization."
Edwards, however, can't be happy about his low level of support in Nevada, a state where his aggressive pitch to organized labor ought to be an advantage, said Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia.
"This is really bad news for Edwards," Sabato said. "Nevada is supposed to be one of his stronger states because of labor. That's remarkably low for him."
Prospective candidates who haven't yet said they're going to run were included in the poll, among them, Al Gore, who got 9 percent. Gore may have taken votes that would otherwise have gone to Edwards or Obama, Coker noted.
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, who has mounted an aggressive push in Nevada, came in fifth in the poll with 6 percent. National polls have generally put him at 2 or 3 percent.
"He's a Westerner. His campaign has been selling us analysts on the idea that he's going to be the regional Western candidate, but so far he's not doing so well," Sabato said. "Six percent is double his national number, but so what? It's still 6 percent."
On the Republican side, former New York City Mayor Giuliani leads most national polls, followed by McCain, Thompson and Romney. The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll put Giuliani at 33 percent, McCain at 22 percent, Thompson at 17 percent and Romney at 12 percent.
Thompson, the "Law & Order" star and former Tennessee senator, has not yet entered the race.
Those national poll numbers are seen as very soft and subject to fluctuation as Republican voters evaluate a wide-open field. Nevadans' answers reflect that uncertainty, Herzik said.
"There is no clear Republican favorite, in Nevada or nationally," he said. "This race is anyone's to win."
Republicans, he said, are behind Democrats in campaign terms, particularly in Nevada, where the decision to hold an early nominating caucus was made just last month. Democrats have been planning their Jan. 19 caucus, scheduled for after the Iowa caucuses and before the New Hampshire primary, since last August.
"Republicans will start showing up in Nevada, but at this point they're behind in the process," he said.
The Review-Journal poll was taken before Thursday night's debate among Republican candidates. Another candidate who hasn't announced whether he's running, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, also made a dent in the Review-Journal poll, with 7 percent support.
McCain has made campaign appearances in Northern and Southern Nevada in recent weeks. Giuliani raised more money in Nevada than any other candidate of either party in the first quarter, and he has some high-profile supporters here such as state Senate Majority Leader Bill Raggio and U.S. Rep. Jon Porter.
Romney has yet to campaign in Nevada. The former Massachusetts governor's only trip here was a private fundraiser in Las Vegas in March.
Sabato noted that 28 percent of Nevada Republicans said they were undecided, compared to 19 percent of Democrats.
"It's a jump ball, nationally and in Nevada," he said. "Republicans are much less decided than Democrats."
((((Romney PING)))
Of course Hitlary has a huge lead in Nevada! If Harry Reid can get re-elected time and again, anybody can. Las Vegas is the equivalent of Northern Virginia, New Hampshire, Vermont, Ithaca etc. All were conservative bastions of moral decency. Now...they’re all Marxist hell holes filled with left wing elitists.
And yet he's in a statistical tie for first. Way cool!
Though I theologically am opposed to Mormonism and would strongly prefer Fred or another candidate, if Romney is the Republican nominee I will vote for him in Nov. 08 - in fact I will vote for whoever the nominee is - so that we will win. I hope other conservatives will do the same.
I think they will. And I am seeing more and more evidence here on FR and elsewhere that this will be the case, particularly now after the debate and appearance on Leno. He is a fantastic candidate and that’s all that should matter.
Outside of a Hillary/Obama presidency, IMHO the absolute worst outcome would be McCain. Yes, far and above worse than Rudy. Rudy is pretty honest about what he’s for and against, as is Mitt. But McClame is unbalanced and devious. He would have the worst elements of Bush’s “new tone” with the most sinister Nixonian/Clinton traits. Not a good combo.
As will I, even if I have to hold my nose. Any R candidate is better than a D.
I hope that our R legislators will all assume a leadership position and listen to what we are saying; that we want conservative issues and values heeded!
Unless, of course, he changes his mind (again).....
With the large population of liberal elitist and the illegal “voting” employees of the industry of sin what else do you expect from Lost Wages. By sear population alone they will rule the rest of the state like the Willamette Valley rules the entire state of Oregon.
The most recent poll I’d seen before this one put Romney at 4%. He’s almost tripled his original tally without even showing up in the state.
Granted, that’s not much when you’re talking such small percentages. And you can bet these numbers are going to change. But when you got from just barely being on the radar to a statistical tie for the lead, you can’t feel too bad about things.
Really? When was Las Vegas a bastion of moral decency?
“Harry Reid’s son is supporting the Hillorat.”
His son is also thinking of running for Congress against Congressman Jon Porter next year.
12 percent for RudyTheOnlyOneWhoCanBeatHillaryGiuliani.
Time is definitely on Romney’s side!
This has to be one of the more careless McCain digs I’ve come across, that McCain will continue Bush’s “New Tone.” McCain may be many things but he is also a wild card, and for one, vowing to make prokbarrelers “famous” hardly sounds like a continuation of Bush’s “New Tone.” In fact, his campaign sounds far more reformist.
I disagree. He is COMPLETELY in line with that mentality. Look at the discussions he’s had with DEMOCRATS to be his “running mate.” Look at the incredible “bipartisan” activities he has engaged in. He is 100% “new tone” and worse-—he would actually bring them inside the tent.
“Bipartisanship”? That’s all you’ve got? Did you watch the debate? For one, McCain is not afraid to ruffle feathers. I respect that. And it’s the farthest thing from Bush’s “New Tone.”
As for “look[ing] at the discussions he’s had with Democrats to be ‘his running mate’,” I’ll be happy to look once you show me the transcript. :o)
McCain Feingold? McCain Kennedy? How many McCain-Democrat bills does he have to sponsor before you'll concede he's a "new tone" guy. If you think Bush had a lot of Dems in his administration, wait until you see a McCrazy administration. Teddy K will be secretary of defense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.