Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger
That survey, and the timing....just happens to coincide with the hearings - could there be a more obvious set up to make the Marines look "bad"?

I couldn't believe what I was looking at when I saw Petreaus on TV expressing his concern for the low percentage that would report a fellow soldier for killing a civilian.

26 posted on 05/08/2007 8:58:26 AM PDT by 4woodenboats (Bush owns the war on terror, but the Dems/Media want to own another 'Nam style loss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: 4woodenboats; Chickenhawk Warmonger
Didn't see him on TV, but Gen. Patreus' responses appear weak in the article. From the article:

"We can never sink to the level of the enemy," Petraeus said by video link from Baghdad. "We have done that at times in theater and it has cost us enormously" -- referring specifically to the torture and humiliation of prisoners at the Abu Ghraib facility west of Baghdad.

I wouldn't call the humiliation at Abu Ghraib anywhere close to sinking to the level of the enemy who beheads, tortures, blows up people. NOT CLOSE! That's quite disappointing even if you are pandering to Iraqis or the media.

It would be interesting to see these questions in context. Yes/No responses to such serious issues like, "Would you turn in a fellow Marine if they killed or wounded an innocent civilian" is useless information. Well, was it an accident, how seriously wounded are they, are you sure they were innocent (they don't wear uniforms), do you trust your immediate command to not railroad your buddy, etc.
29 posted on 05/08/2007 9:25:38 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson