Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Jersey to move on .50 caliber gun ban following Dix arrests
Associated Press ^ | May 10, 2007 | Tom Hester, Jr.

Posted on 05/10/2007 12:56:12 PM PDT by Zakeet

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — Legislators Thursday will begin considering whether to make New Jersey the second state to outlaw the powerful .50 caliber rifle which critics contend could potentially be used in terrorist attacks.

The guns, which resemble large hunting rifles, are accurate up to 1 1/2 miles, and critics of the weapons say they could be used to penetrate an airliner or ignite chemical plants, rail tanks cars and refineries.

California is the only state with a similar law.

The ban is getting renewed attention after federal investigators this week announced they had foiled an alleged terrorist plot by six men who were planning to attack Fort Dix.

"As unnerving as the Fort Dix terrorism plot was, it could have been all the more worse if the weapons of choice for alleged assailants had been .50 caliber assault guns instead of AK-47s," said Assemblyman Reed Gusciora, D-Mercer.

The six men arrested Monday night allegedly tried to buy AK-47 assault weapons, M-16s and other weapons from a government informant.

The bill is opposed by gun rights advocates who claim it would do nothing to stem gun violence.

(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; guns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Anybody surprised it took the Rats this long to start their latest grab?
1 posted on 05/10/2007 12:56:16 PM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Wait a minute!

The suspects were trying to purchase firearms which are already illegal — and the response is to make another class of firearms (one which they weren’t even interested in) illegal?

Of all the asinine, transparent ...

2 posted on 05/10/2007 12:59:07 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Has any of these do-gooding gun grabbers ever handled one of those 50 cal. guns? They are so heavy and unwieldy as to render them useless for the attack these terrorists were planning.


3 posted on 05/10/2007 12:59:23 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rear view mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

How about moving on terrorist cells instead?


4 posted on 05/10/2007 1:01:33 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Too bad they’re not moving to invalidate the “sanctuary city” laws which allowed them to not report the illegals to Homeland Security in the first place.


5 posted on 05/10/2007 1:02:35 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

..and there will be a codicil that allows NJ DPS to ignore Governor caravans which do not exceed warp factor 90 on state highways and byways!


6 posted on 05/10/2007 1:02:56 PM PDT by Young Werther ( and Julius Ceasar said, "quae cum ita sunt." (or since these things are so!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
"As unnerving as the Fort Dix terrorism plot was, it could have been all the more worse if the weapons of choice for alleged assailants had been .50 caliber assault guns instead of AK-47s," said Assemblyman Reed Gusciora, D-Mercer.

Actually, full-auto AK-47s would be far a more effective choice of rifle than the .50 cal bolt action for the type of attack they were planning -- killing as many people as possible.

7 posted on 05/10/2007 1:03:23 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Hey, that's a great idea! If they had banned .50 caliber guns, those Fort Dix guys never would have been a threat!

They should ban cars since they could potentially be used in terrorist attacks, also.

8 posted on 05/10/2007 1:03:48 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The suspects were trying to purchase firearms which are already illegal — and the response is to make another class of firearms (one which they weren’t even interested in) illegal?

They already had semi-autos, which is what was on the tape. They wanted full auto rifles.

9 posted on 05/10/2007 1:04:30 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (John 19:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Amazing how quickly 50 cal threads proliferate. Where is the picture of the tank put on its roof by a single 50 cal shot?


10 posted on 05/10/2007 1:04:43 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
"That's not a cartridge, THIS is a cartridge!"


11 posted on 05/10/2007 1:05:17 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby ("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
"As unnerving as the Fort Dix terrorism plot was, it could have been all the more worse if the weapons of choice for alleged assailants had been .50 caliber assault guns instead of AK-47s," said Assemblyman Reed Gusciora, D-Mercer.

The terrorists at Fort Dix mentioned several times that it was impossible for them to get hold of AK-47s legally in New Jersey, and were seeking to buy them illegally from sources in Pennsylvania and Maryland.

If terrorists with money were unable to purchase the weapons they actually wanted in NJ, why does it make sense to ban weapons they didn't even want?

Further, the .50 cal would not have been suited to the terrorist's purposes at all: they were looking for automatic AK-47s which they could run quickly with in order to spray a crowd with as many rounds as possible.

The .50 cal would have been extremely unwieldy and inconvenient for them.

12 posted on 05/10/2007 1:05:43 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

How about a law that states: Name = Mohammed = no sale.


13 posted on 05/10/2007 1:06:12 PM PDT by Screamname (The only reason time exists is so everything doesn`t happen all at once - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

They should be issuing twin .50s to non felon, mentally healthy citizens.


14 posted on 05/10/2007 1:07:43 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
If the Rats want to totally outlaw guns,they'd pay some idiot to look like a terrorists and get caught with a .22 then a .38 then a ..and so on.

One by one, all guns will be outlawed.

15 posted on 05/10/2007 1:08:32 PM PDT by llevrok (Truth is the enemy of the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dumpster Baby

“it’ll blow your head clean off .... well .... are you feeling lucky?.... punk!”


16 posted on 05/10/2007 1:09:00 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Outlaw guns! That’s what the libs want to do. The libs don’t want to do what is necessary to protect this country! Racial profiling. Expulsion of all who come here from predominantly jihadi countries.


17 posted on 05/10/2007 1:09:07 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Just more useless legislation from the taxsuckers in Trenton.


18 posted on 05/10/2007 1:09:14 PM PDT by paulcissa (The first requirement of Liberalism is to stand on your head and tell the world they're upside down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Like terrorists are going to be intimidated by liberal feel-good laws.

Seems to me it was illegal to bring dangerous materials onto aircraft on 9/11, but that didn’t exactly stop the terrorists, now did it?


19 posted on 05/10/2007 1:12:15 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; All

nope but it does prove that Rats rule by excuses rather than cause.

A hang nail is an excuse for socialized medicine.
A cough is an excuse for mandatory euthenasia.
A stern look is an excuse for hate crimes.
Opposition to democrats is justification for “fairness doctrine” to silence the oposition.

It is ONLY about aquisition of personal power. NOTHING is sacred, everything can be sold to aquire power over others.


20 posted on 05/10/2007 1:13:40 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson