To: Count of Monte Logan
I heard plural marriage came about as a way to help another family survive in the frontier and wilderness when a husband died. People died young in the 1900s and life was not easy.
Is this accurate?
This Morman bash-fest is clearly being instigated.
73 posted on
05/11/2007 4:01:22 PM PDT by
BobS
To: BobS
Plural marriage is a strawman raised to create dissension points. It is not relevant to Romney, unless the contrast of his one marriage so successful for so long is to be highlighted.
75 posted on
05/11/2007 4:10:38 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
To: BobS
I think it was more a purely faith-based principle, but it probably had some practical benefits in the 1800s.
And I agree there will be some Mormons(even back then) that will abuse the practice such that it fits stereotypes at times. But in general, it was a practice of the Mormon church that was not evil, although the perception to others can be bad. Certainly today’s apostates in Arizona are turning it into a tragic legacy. But the main leaders of the church(Joseph Smith and Brigham Young) were men like the prophet Abraham..(in my opinion).
To: BobS
I heard plural marriage came about as a way to help another family survive in the frontier and wilderness when a husband died. So THAT's why all them other states but Utah had trouble being populated!
109 posted on
05/12/2007 4:30:29 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson