Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq: U.S., U.K. Troops Needed 'One or Two Years' More
NewsMax.com ^ | May 11, 2007 | staff

Posted on 05/11/2007 3:50:04 PM PDT by kellynla

CAMBRIDGE -- Iraq will need U.S. and British troops for another year or two and the U.S. Congress should reconsider its votes to cut off funding before then, President Jalal Talabani said on Friday.

"I think in one or two years we will be able to recruit our own army forces and say goodbye to our friends," the president told students in a lecture at England's Cambridge University.

He later told reporters he hoped the U.S. Congress would reconsider votes to set a deadline for withdrawing troops.

"We are concerned," he said. "We hope that Congress will review this decision and will be ready - to train them and to protect the state of Iraq."

U.S. President George W. Bush vetoed a $124 billion war funding bill last week because it set a deadline for the withdrawal of combat troops, but the U.S. House of Representatives passed a new bill on Thursday that provides only enough money to continue combat for two or three months.

U.S. Democrats and some Republicans say Iraq's Shi'ite- and Kurdish-led government must reach out to minority Sunni Arabs and reduce sectarian violence if it wants U.S. forces to stay.

Talabani, a veteran Kurdish leader, said the government was determined to show progress.

"We are doing our best to have real political achievement in reconciliation," he said.

"We are planning to have all the partners in the government, in decision making, and to show tangible achievements to the Congress that we are going forward toward the reconciliation."

The Iraqi president visited Britain the day after Prime Minister Tony Blair announced he would resign in June.

Talabani praised Blair, who along with U.S. President George W. Bush toppled Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein and put Talabani's government in power, as a "hero of Iraq's liberation".

He said he had never met Blair's presumed successor, finance minister Gordon Brown, but had heard he was a "clever man" and expected him to continue Blair's policy of support for his government.

But earlier on Friday Brown hinted that he could change British policy toward Iraq, saying mistakes had been made there.

"I do think that over the next few months the emphasis will shift. We've got to concentrate more on political reconciliation in Iraq, we've got to concentrate more on economic development," Brown told a news conference.

Talabani said he agreed mistakes had been made in Iraq - he singled out the decision to impose an initial U.S.-led occupation for 14 months after the invasion before setting up a sovereign Iraqi government.

But he insisted Western media had exaggerated the degree of violence in his country and the potential for ethnic and sectarian war.

"There is no danger of civil war or fighting between Shi'ites and Sunnis in Iraq," he said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: iraq; uk; usa; war

1 posted on 05/11/2007 3:50:07 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gubamyster; freema

ping


2 posted on 05/11/2007 3:50:35 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
That's sounds good. We need to have at least 150k troops for another two years and then we can start withdrawing troops and it will be up to the Iraqi government to protect the Iraqi people.

I believe that while we withdraw, we should have at least 50,000 troops and all our air force bases there so the Iraqi military can call on our superior airpower indefinitely.

3 posted on 05/11/2007 3:53:13 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

This should put some ice on the Sadrist Propaganda bill calling for an eventual date of withdrawal (which BTW hasn’t even passed).

“One or two years” translates into “as long as Bush is in Office”. The Iraqis know well that if a Dem becomes President, they will surrender Iraq to the terrorists.


4 posted on 05/11/2007 3:53:49 PM PDT by SolidWood (Islam is an insanity cult that makes everyone act Arab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Our response should be "whatever it takes." You don't fight wars for any reason except to vanquish the enemy. Until that is done, we ain't done.
5 posted on 05/11/2007 3:56:09 PM PDT by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

“The Iraqis know well that if a Dem becomes President, they will surrender Iraq to the terrorists.”

1974 Viet Nam dedux...

“Ready 4 Freddy”


6 posted on 05/11/2007 3:58:11 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Iraq will need U.S. and British troops for another year or two and the U.S. Congress should reconsider its votes to cut off funding before then, President Jalal Talabani said on Friday.

Even the Iraqis are succumbing to the liberal mantra.

Are Nancy and Harry worthy of this?

Obviously politics are more important than what is best over all.

7 posted on 05/11/2007 4:03:17 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Iraq will need U.S. and British troops for another year or two

Does that include 2 months vacation for the troops each year? Or is that just for the Iraqi officials?

[/s]
8 posted on 05/11/2007 4:03:40 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

I object their vacation just as much as you do, but matter of factly it has been already cut down by half.


9 posted on 05/11/2007 4:07:26 PM PDT by SolidWood (Islam is an insanity cult that makes everyone act Arab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Perhaps we can use this opportunity to demand Sadr’s head on a platter as a condition of our staying.

Ironicaly, this move by the dims may have the beneficial effect of breaking the political log-jams in the Iraqi Parliament. If they become convinced that we will leave if they move forward, they may get their collective crap together.

If they do, be prepared for Pelosi and comapny to claim credit for any victory in Iraq because of their “tough stance”.


10 posted on 05/11/2007 4:26:43 PM PDT by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

According to our military, Sadr is still hiding in Iran.


11 posted on 05/11/2007 4:29:18 PM PDT by SolidWood (Islam is an insanity cult that makes everyone act Arab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; tgslTakoma; the right reverend; RaceBannon; Lady J USA 1981; mdittmar; trooprally; ...

Thanks for the thread, kellynla!!


12 posted on 05/13/2007 8:15:33 AM PDT by MountainFlower (There but by the grace of God go I.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson