Posted on 05/14/2007 5:26:49 PM PDT by Former Fetus
Cassandra Harding waited nervously, dreading the moment her athlete's body would betray her.
Everyone would know her secret, including her track coaches at the University of Memphis - where she was on a full athletic scholarship.
"I didn't want to talk to anyone about it. I thought, what am I going to do now?" she said. "I didn't want to lose my scholarship."
But she did. And that's exactly what her coaches warned would happen.
Harding said she and other members of the Memphis women's track team were required to sign a document acknowledging they could lose their scholarships if they became pregnant.
The Memphis athletic department refused to discuss scholarship rules.
"The University of Memphis does not believe that it has violated any federal laws in the matter of Cassandra Harding," the school said in a statement.
Harding spoke first to ESPN, which was to include her comments in an Outside the Lines report set for broadcast today. Seven Clemson student-athletes told ESPN they had abortions in recent years, due in part to their fear of losing scholarships.
NCAA spokesman Erik Christianson declined comment on the Memphis case, but he acknowledged yesterday that there are no national guidelines about pregnancy. Christianson said decisions on financial aid and scholarships are made by individual schools.
Christianson added that the NCAA's national office allows pregnant athletes to apply for an extra year of eligibility, which would not count as a redshirt year. That gives some women an opportunity to stay in school for six years while competing for four.
Harding and teammate Gail Lee said Memphis coaches made it clear pregnancy can end an athletic career. Harding, who has rejoined the team since giving birth to a daughter, said the document listed other causes for which scholarships could be lost - including drug or alcohol abuse, or assaulting a coach.
"The track coaches hand that out to you. They like read it over and then tell you to sign it," said Harding, a jumper. "Well, I wasn't really thinking anything about it because I wasn't going to get pregnant."
But she did toward the end of her sophomore year in October 2004, and gave birth to Assiah in July 2005. Harding said she considered having an abortion to avoid losing her scholarship, but decided against it.
"I shouldn't have been put in that position," she said. "I'm so happy I have my baby."
When a new school year began, Memphis declined to renew her scholarship. So Harding borrowed the money to stay in school for her junior year, and worked part-time jobs - as a waitress, and as a package handler at the FedEx terminal in Memphis - while rejoining the track team as a walk-on.
Harding said she went to school during the day, worked at night, went back to class in the morning and practiced with the team when required. Her boyfriend took care of the baby when she was in school or at work.
The university lists her as being red-shirted for the 2005 outdoor season and as having missed the 2006 indoor season.
Now a senior, she has a partial athletic scholarship that pays for tuition and books. She had to sign the document again when she got the partial scholarship.
Her boyfriend is now in the Army, so Assiah is living with Cassandra's mother, Maple Harding, in Killeen, Texas. Cassandra Harding expects to graduate in December with a degree in criminal justice.
Lee, a thrower and one of Memphis's top athletes, said she signed a similar document in August 2005.
"There are guys on our team that have babies. Why wouldn't they have to follow the same rule?" said Lee, who won the shot put and finished second in the hammer throw at the Conference USA outdoor championships this weekend in Houston.
Track coach Kevin Robinson declined to discuss the case.
"Look, we're here to compete, not to become a spectacle," Robinson said Friday. "I'm certainly not in a position to comment for the school. We certainly don't want to be represented in a poor light."
Scholarships come up for renewal yearly, and colleges can decline to renew for an athlete unable to perform for medical reasons unrelated to athletics, said Barbara Osborne, a lawyer and assistant professor of sports law research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
"That is an entirely legal thing and within NCAA rules," Osborne said.
But many schools continue scholarships for students temporarily sidelined by accidents, illness or other medical conditions, Osborne said, and some are developing programs to assist pregnant athletes to help them stay in college.
"Refusing to renew scholarships solely because of pregnancy smacks of moralizing," Osborne said, "and to actually have a policy like that and put it in writing seems very 1940s and '50s."
The scholarship is given by the University so that it can have star athletes. If these female athletes who have signed the contract are unable to perform, they should be removed from the teams and lose their scholarships.
To complain after the fact shows that these women lack critical thinking skills. And I doubt the benefit of a college education would be of assistance to them.
This isn’t about feminism. It is simply about fulfilling contract obligations.
I absolutely believe that avoiding pregnancy is more the responsibility of the woman. We are the ones who live pregnant for around nine months. I have always felt disdain for women who tried to secure their relationship by pregnancy. I also believe that the man should have equal say in whether a woman gets an abortion or not. Men have feelings and attachments to their children, too. You may have guessed I’m not too popular with my Lib friends when it comes to talking on this subject.
I see no problem here at all.
She had a track scholarship. She got prego.
Done. Finito!
What’s all the discussion about? Yeah, she loses her scholarship. End of story.
If she kept her legs closed she’d still have her scholarship.
Nor do I perceive a moralistic standard.
Unless you consider that the terms of a sport based scholarship seems to require female athletes practice either celibacy or extremely reliable birth controll methods, in order to comply with the physical requirements needed to retain their scholarships.
Neither of which BTW, are necessarily based on morality.
It seems to me, though no apparent in the article, the "pregnancy rule" is not a morals based rule, but a performance based rule, you get a scholarship to complete in sports to generate revenue for the college. If you don't complete, you don't get a free ride
Males though a huge Darwinian lapse in PC correctness do not bare child so they are exempt from having to worry about gender equality
Boo frickin hoo. I’ve about had it with the darn teachers getting preggers in the middle of the year and taking their maternity leave and then walzing back for the last month of school jerking the kids’ affections around. Like the school is run for their benefits and not my kids’.
The university has excellent lawyers, they will win.
Should his scholarship be yanked?
Was the pregnancy an accident?
I’ve about had it with the darn teachers getting preggers in the middle of the year
__________________________________________________
There’s plenty of couples who can’t just schedule a pregnancy - they take it when they can get and are grateful.
Mrs VS
Post 30 well said.
DUH !!!
Wow, its a miracle. Guys having babies.
Perhaps it is because the guys can still compete and play. Shoot, they probably can run even faster trying to get away from the shotgun wedding.
Whereas an 8+ along mother not only can't run very fast, she is likely to have to be taken to the hospital if she tries.
Translation: I killed my unborn kid to become a gym teacher.
F
Truth! It is blinding when it occurs!
Frequently. Sometimes male athletes lose their scholarships because their sport is eliminated to accommodate women's sports under Title IX. No injury, pregnancy, or failure to adhere to a signed contract necessary.
The redshirt option was made available to her, and she ended up with a scholarship after she gave birth. Boo freakin' hoo.
My thoughts exactly.
After all...they are GIVING the athelete the money in return for a the athetic effort to make their teams perform at a higher level.
Did it happen on the court????? If so I’d like to see that instant replay.
LOL...that is the best quote of this article...and I missed it on the first read! (I guess I got too impatient to post...:)
Agreed...well said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.