Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican candidate Mitt Romney explains his pro-life journey
Catholic News Agency ^

Posted on 05/15/2007 3:49:32 AM PDT by fabrizio

Massachusetts, May 14, 2007 / 03:56 pm (CNA).- Massachusetts Citizens for Life honored former Governor Mitt Romney on Thursday at their Mother’s day Pioneer dinner. Governor Romney is currently running for the Republican nomination for President.

Romney recounted his journey to his present day pro-life positions. . “I follow a long line of converts—George Herbert Walker Bush, Henry Hyde, Ronald Reagan.” He described how after studying embryo farming and cloning, he began to focus more on life issues. Until then he was publicly pro-choice and pledged to support Roe v. Wade. After speaking to scientists who supported embryo cloning for research purposes and studying the subject in great detail, he realized that “the Roe v. Wade mentality ha[d} so cheapened the value of human life that rational people saw human life as mere research material to be used, and then destroyed. The slippery slope could soon lead to racks and racks of living human embryos, Brave New World-like, awaiting destruction.”

He continued, "[w}hat some see as a mere clump of cells is actually a human life. Human life has identity. Human life has the capacity to love and to be loved. Human life has profound dignity, dignity undiminished by age or infirmity.”

As a result of this conversion, he stated that he publicly acknowledged his error. He sought to live up to his commitment to life by fighting to ban cloning and embryo farming. He sought to define life at beginning at conception rather than at implantation. Additionally, he supported abstinence education in schools.

Romney also warned against the growing trend in the courts to decide on issues that should be decided by the people. "Make no mistake: abortion and same-sex marriage are not rights to be discovered in the Constitution.” He reminded the audience of the important role the President plays in selecting judges who properly understand their limited roll as “servants of the law.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; elections; prolife; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 05/15/2007 3:49:37 AM PDT by fabrizio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fabrizio

Romney, as is the case for the rest of the so called candidates is/are frauds of the highest order.


2 posted on 05/15/2007 4:00:00 AM PDT by Jeremydmccann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann

Please explain, Jeremy - do think Romney is a fraud because it is not possible to become pro-life after supporting abortion in the past?


3 posted on 05/15/2007 4:18:29 AM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fabrizio
“I follow a long line of converts—George Herbert Walker Bush, Henry Hyde, Ronald Reagan.”

If their reasoning for becoming prolife was so profound 25-30 years ago, why didn't you change your reasoning back then instead of recently?

4 posted on 05/15/2007 4:45:52 AM PDT by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fabrizio
I believe him. Lots of people are marginally pro-abortion until they look at the actual science.

Why do you think the left and Planned Murderhood does not want patients to be informed?

5 posted on 05/15/2007 4:49:44 AM PDT by CWW (Make the most of the loss, and regroup for 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluebird Singing

Romney is a fraud because he didn’t make any “journey” of change at all. All he did was flip flop so that he could get votes. Anyone who believes he had an epiphany is a fool.

It was merely an announcement of convenience.


6 posted on 05/15/2007 4:51:28 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fabrizio
November 2004: Mitt decides to run for president
November 2004: Mitt decides he's pro-life

Coincidence, surely!

Of course he didn't announce either his presidential interest or his sudden pro-life conversion until a few months later.

When did Mitt's newfound beliefs start to come out? Well, one major milestone was when Mitt was campaigning in South Carolina, an early presidential primary state. He called himself pro-life and started bashing Massachusetts.

But a coincidence, surely!

7 posted on 05/15/2007 4:51:29 AM PDT by JohnnyZ ("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonman

“If their reasoning for becoming prolife was so profound 25-30 years ago, why didn’t you change your reasoning back then instead of recently?”

Because we hadn’t really thought about it back then. “When I was a child, I thought and acted as a liberal. When I became an adult I gave up liberal ways.” Romney’s conversion mirrors my own. I wasn’t raised pro-life. When the partial-birth abortion issue came up, it forced me to shut out everything else, and sit down and really think about this. In a short time, the reality and obvious truth of the matter came crashing through in a way that can never be reversed. I am ashamed that I ever thought differently, but I’m glad that I no longer do. There are some people whose pro-life stances strike me as wishy-washy or finger-in-the wind; I don’t get that feeling from Mitt, and I’ve seen a pretty good amount of him, being from Mass. (where is the road out of here?).

As a convert, I am often perplexed by the tendency of many pro-life people to reject the conversion of others. We’re sorry we’re late to the party. Can we come in, or are you going to leave us out in the cold, now that we’ve left our old friends, and in many cases, split with our families?


8 posted on 05/15/2007 5:01:44 AM PDT by Humble Servant (Keep it simple - do what's right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fabrizio; All
Well if Mitt now believes that abortion is indeed murder, that's a good development.

However I think I'll stay with *my* candidate who has ALWAYS been pro-life, didn't have to experience some 'epiphany', and said:

"The reason our citizens are good is because of our faith and because we believe that all mankind is endowed by our creator with inalienable rights. We believe in the value of the human soul. When we appoint judges, we are handing great power, the power of life and death, to individual people. As President, I want judges with discernment. If a judicial candidate can look at a sonagram picture of an unborn child and not see a human being worthy of protection, I will not give him an appointment to the court. I will, however, get him an appointment with an optometrist for a set of eye glasses."
- Congressman Duncan Hunter,
(
who has ALWAYS talked the talk AND walked the walk.)
9 posted on 05/15/2007 5:04:22 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann

Not Duncan Hunter


10 posted on 05/15/2007 5:07:44 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one

Exactly.


11 posted on 05/15/2007 5:11:10 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann

He is also a fraud with his position on the 2ND Amendment. Does not Veto the MA AWB, because he knows it will be overridden. But he does Veto hundreds of spending bills, which are overridden. So Mitt “the flip” did not know these spending bills would be overridden? The spending bills veto was a symbolic ploy by Mitt for his run for POTUS


12 posted on 05/15/2007 5:17:22 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Humble Servant
I appreciate your candor and I am glad that you have reasoned for the good. In Mitt's case though, the guy was born, raised and accepted teachings as a Mormon. There never should have been a period where he agreed with abortion.

I attended a Mennonite Church in my youth. For me to think of ANY Amish or Mennonite agreeing with abortion would be just as disheartening.

13 posted on 05/15/2007 5:20:53 AM PDT by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann
I agree. But, I am left with a quandary. At this point it seems the only viable and electable candidates for the GOP nomination are frauds. Should I vote for the lesser of the evils? If so, I would vote for Romney. At this point, I will let it play out and watch the debates.
14 posted on 05/15/2007 5:40:47 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: moonman
If their reasoning for becoming prolife was so profound 25-30 years ago, why didn't you change your reasoning back then instead of recently?

ever heard of the 4th dimension?

15 posted on 05/15/2007 5:46:43 AM PDT by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984

nobody should vote for the lesser of two evils because it is still evil. The whole lesser of two evils mentality is exactly why this country is still killing babies, pro-UN, anti-sovereignty, pro criminal alien onslaught and well on its way for mandatory acceptance of the perverted sodomites.


16 posted on 05/15/2007 5:51:51 AM PDT by Jeremydmccann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: moonman
The Mormon church has no official position on abortion, at least according to the Catholics:

Mormon Stumpers:

Didn’t you assume Mormons were pro-life? That’s certainly the image their church attempts to broadcast, and most Mormons, in fact, mistakenly believe their church opposes abortion and regards it as an objective evil. But not so.

Indeed, the Mormon church accepts abortion for a number of reasons. The Church Handbook of Instructions, approved in September, 1998, states that abortion may be performed in the following circumstances: pregnancy resulting from rape or incest; a competent physician says the life or health of the mother is in serious jeopardy; or a competent physician says that the "fetus" has severe defects that will not allow the "baby" to survive beyond birth. In any case, the persons responsible must first consult with their church leader and receive God’s approval in prayer (156).

OK, it's probably not fair to Mormons to quote a Catholic anti-Mormon web site posting to show their beliefs.

17 posted on 05/15/2007 6:06:36 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fabrizio
He described how after studying embryo farming and cloning, he began to focus more on life issues.

OK. If Romney was also a late convert to the LDS church, I actually might buy this.

But why would it take simple biological science to convert this man when his own lifetime theology is that every baby inhabits a spirit that was born in heaven in the Mormon Pre-existence? I mean, LDS in this way have a peculiar understanding of pregnancy: It's a bus ride into this colony from Kolobville.

So he's now telling us that he never understood that every hour when there's dozens, if not hundreds, of abortions in this country that it's tantamount to the bus driver from Kolobville driving off a cliff?

Now if he didn't really believe in Kolobville in the mid-90s. If he didn't believe in the Mormon pre-existence, then OK, pro-life "conversion" is consistent. But where there's inconsistencies, there ya find integrity issues.

18 posted on 05/15/2007 7:04:22 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

thanks for the Mormon position on abortion


19 posted on 05/15/2007 9:08:14 AM PDT by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fabrizio; sevenbak; DelphiUser; tantiboh; Utah Girl; Rameumptom; Saundra Duffy

Bigotry in America?
http://www.allaboutmormons.com/ENG_Video62.php


20 posted on 05/15/2007 9:24:56 AM PDT by restornu (As I have Love you Love One To Another ~ "Go Mitt":)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson