Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Presidential Candidate Debate #2 - Columbia, SC 05/15/07 - Official Discussion Thread
May 15, 2007

Posted on 05/15/2007 4:25:06 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,921-2,9402,941-2,9602,961-2,9802,981-2,988 last
To: txradioguy
(Late reply)

The Original Roe case was based on flawed logic and arguments anyway.

FYI, Roe v. Wade was a phony case whose plaintiff (Roe) has since renounced her agreement with its process and outcome.

2,981 posted on 05/20/2007 8:51:31 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 909 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
Well, many of us don't want this right in the hands of the next maniac pointing at our sons and daughters during class.

The next maniac may be your friendly socialist agent looking for compliance to some stupid, obscure law.

2,982 posted on 05/20/2007 8:54:18 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty
(Late response)

First I would like to say Terri Schiavo was killed by her husband...I do not want the government involved with my family's medical issues...

Wrong answer Mcfry. The government should be all about protecting Life and stopping murder.

2,983 posted on 05/21/2007 8:55:29 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1712 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003; All
(Late reply)

I wasn't able to watch the debate since I don't get the cable channel it was on. Hope we can get a conservative panel questioning the candidates on a regular "regular" channel or "regular" cable. Rots of ruck. However, I feel like I've got a pretty good feeling about the debates from reading this mammoth post.

My question is, other than Ron Paul (Moonbat), did Hunter or Tancerdo have any focus on the importance of our Constitution? Would like to see more focus on this issue. Sounds like Hunter didn't get much of a chance to say much of anything, but it sounds like he was hitting homers with what he was pitched.

2,984 posted on 05/21/2007 9:08:29 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1732 | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush
According to my sources:
2,985 posted on 05/22/2007 6:28:19 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2317 | View Replies]

To: patriciamary
(Late response)

over turn roe vs wade,reality check it’s not going to happen...

It WILL happen. Its not a question of if but when.

2,986 posted on 05/22/2007 8:21:15 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2005 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

I don’t really know Paul’s views, I guess. Do you really think he would build up our defense capabilities?


2,987 posted on 06/05/2007 11:19:15 PM PDT by unfortunately a bluestater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2977 | View Replies]

To: unfortunately a bluestater
I think so by doing several things. First is taking troops out of nations where they are not actually needed. We have troops in 100 plus nations by accounts I've read. Ron Paul seems to follow a lot of Reagan policy and it would not surprise me to see him appoint a very much needed Cap Weinberger type Sec of Defense who has the actual smarts and insight to fix our military.

I also think the ongoing unending deployments of out National Guard and reserves would end and our military return to a more active duty focused operation. Since Gulf War one our reserve troops have been in ongoing call up deployments. We fought the Cold War and did better than this but now it seems that every time something or anything happens anywhere in the world our reply is calling up troops for deployments when more limited operations would be a better answer.

The Constitution provides for other actions short of war to take care of such issues as thug dictators who threaten our national security. They are called Letters of Marque and Reprisal. Meaning POTUS goes to congress {in closed session} and asks for the taking out of a leader. This is part of the reason we are in this whole mess. Jerry Ford tried to put a stop to it. Getting persons like Bin Ladden is much easier when they wander freely. But announcing to the world we're coming to get you is kinda foolish when you know they will go into hiding. The same with Saddam. We didn't need to announce to the world our intentions nor especially the persons we were going after. If we backed off on Bin Ladden we could have him likely within a year or two probably much quicker than our current operations. Remember the Russians chased him for 10 years. Afterward he began making public appearances again. Hit them when they feel safe and use resources more wisely.

2,988 posted on 06/07/2007 8:49:27 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Kool Aid! The popular American favorite drink now Made In Mexico. Pro-Open Borders? Drink Up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2987 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,921-2,9402,941-2,9602,961-2,9802,981-2,988 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson