Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers
No answer to my post #331:

I replied in post #364. I agreed with the essence of your point and amplified it a bit, before replying.

Am I on your ignore list?

No, no ignore list, but your response was too agreeable!

I was waiting for somebody to make fun of my long list of dubious "knowledge" ("magic, superstition, wishful thinking..., etc.") while defending divine revelation, and then to provide a rational method of differentiating among all of those various sources of "knowledge" -- all the while denigrating science as too uncertain and too limited in scope.

That would have been entertaining to say the least.

377 posted on 06/10/2007 7:25:45 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman; edsheppa; grey_whiskers; andysandmikesmom; betty boop; cornelis; .30Carbine; hosepipe; ..
Evidently you consider your post at 331 to be a knee-slapper, Coyoteman – but to me it is pitiful because you obviously have never experienced the first and most important divine revelation all Christians have experienced, i.e. when it dawned in us that Jesus Christ is Lord.

Divine revelations are the most certain knowledge for me because I have known God personally for nearly a half century.

We who have experienced the power of God in His revelations - especially the Word of God - also know that the wisdom of men is foolishness by comparison.

When you equate God's words with your litany of absurdities you are insulting Him, not me.

379 posted on 06/10/2007 9:49:58 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson