Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK to allow hybrid human-animal embryos
News.com ^ | 5/17/2007 | Tim Castle

Posted on 05/17/2007 7:58:14 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Rutles4Ever

Paging Dr. Linebarger............(a.k.a. Mr. Smith)


41 posted on 05/18/2007 10:55:20 AM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Nope. Not gonna do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Without feeling the need to use any of the nastyisms that you almost felt compelled to use, here I present my rebuttal...

Its only ‘immoral’ if you take a religious viewpoint. Delving into theology a little, as I think it has relevance, what could ‘God’ or whoever hold against the prospect of increasing our life spans and improving the quality of life for ourselves and other around us? If he is the kind and understanding benefactor of us all, then he would understand what we are trying to do.
These aren’t people yet, they are DNA constructs, not even that. Its the raw material that we grow from.

I trust that as you have such a strong moral conviction on this matter that you will refrain from any medical science that has been tested in such a manner? Thats going to leave you with a hell of alot of placebo’s and mysticism. Faith does not cure diseases, medical science on the other hand, has proven to.
I suppose its the argument between the scientist and the theologist. I would rather have cures for disease, and deal with the repercussions later, than not progress as a species.

In all good conscience I find your argument baffling, and in the end, self defeating for us all.


42 posted on 05/18/2007 11:03:34 AM PDT by Rikstir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Waverunner

;)


43 posted on 05/18/2007 11:06:13 AM PDT by Rikstir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Rikstir; Waverunner

“Faith does not cure diseases, medical science on the other hand, has proven to.”

There is no proof that faith does not cure. There are many, many doctors who can document miracle cures that can be attributed to nothing but faith.

You have presumed that I am ignorant in medical matters solely because I cannot justify the creation of a part-human for experimental purposes.

And, I submit that the ONLY reason they suggest a non-human component is to attempt to destigmatize the moral notion that men should not aspire to be divine.

Indeed, a pure human that has been aborted would be a better choice. If you have no moral compunction to protect a creature that is even part human, why not destroy one that is all human?

If you don’t see the slippery slope, some near-perfect grandchild of your own could be in line for research.


44 posted on 05/18/2007 11:26:36 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Rikstir; Froufrou
I don't think it's "ignorance of the idea of the unknown" that puts people off of this type of research: it's knowing all too well what's happening.

The creation of transgenics and chimerics involves the manipulation of a living human embryo who is the genetic offspring of human parents, which in 10 days or so will end in his planned death. This in itself is an act of disrespect for the moral status of an embryonic human being, made quasi-animal by a laboratory process.

The third project, the making a cytoplasmic hybrid, is cloning. Legislation, agreements, and covenants in many countries as well as the World Health Organization and the 1997 G7 Summit meeting in the USA put a moratorium on human cloning, although the definitions are conflicting and the enforcement faulty.

My point in mentioning this is that the ethical problems that have been raised did not come from the science-illiterate "man in the street," but from people at the highest levels of research, international law and human rights.

I'm sure a lot of interesting experiments could be done with sheep-pig chimeras, chimp-dog trnsgenics, or babboon cytoplasmic clones.; and nobody (except maybe Jeremy Rifkin) would have any objection.

But it is a basic ethical principle that human lives at any stage should not be treated as nonconsenting experimental subjects.

45 posted on 05/18/2007 11:45:55 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: chemical_boy
"The bill states that they are to destroy the embryos after the appearance of the primitive streak (when cells begin to divide); 14 days after the beginning of the process to make the chimeric embryo; half the gestation period of any of the species involved, whichever of the three occurs earliest."

But what is the significance of this? Perhaps they think that killing the clones early is morally preferable to letting them grow to a more mature stage; but why? They are drawing a moral line, it seems to me, without a moral basis.

46 posted on 05/18/2007 11:50:07 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rikstir
"The is a difference between an insane, mad-as-a-bottle-of-chips, one-slice-short-of-a-loaf, one-sandwich-short-of-a-picknick, tyrannical, crackpot, Pol Potesque, nutter, and a scientist trying to cure serious diseases that blight the world."

A man who is prepared to insult is generally one who is not prepared to argue.

47 posted on 05/18/2007 11:52:52 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Chimeras huh?
These Brits are stuck in mythology.

Someone should remind them about what happened at Sodom City. They are really pushing the Big Guy’s buttons.


48 posted on 05/18/2007 11:55:10 AM PDT by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Sick, evil, suicidal, vicious - there aren’t words that described this.

Will do pingthing later, thanks for alerting me.


49 posted on 05/18/2007 12:14:57 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Only those who thirst for the truth will know the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fatima
>I thought that site was real until...


50 posted on 05/18/2007 2:06:35 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson