Schlumberger Ltd. a French oil field services company that does business in Sudan.LOL. Isn't it (almost) always a French company?
1 posted on
05/17/2007 6:09:09 PM PDT by
jdm
To: jdm
2 posted on
05/17/2007 6:12:54 PM PDT by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: holdonnow; HonestConservative; Bahbah; rodguy911; sono; RasterMaster; Clint N. Suhks; ...
4 posted on
05/17/2007 6:23:42 PM PDT by
AliVeritas
(I see the men and women on the battlefield... where are the men and women here?)
To: jdm
This is a lot of hot air and a cheap shot. How can anyone know from one day to the next what positions a mutual fund may have from one day to the next. Some funds have well over 100% turnover, meaning that any list that is published is way out of date by the time anyone sees it, aside from the issue that many funds normally only published their top ten holdings.
To: jdm
Yes, guys, go right ahead and sell those mutual funds, divest those oil services stocks, book those capital gains....
THAT’LL teach those nasty Sudanese a thing or two about genocide.
7 posted on
05/17/2007 7:31:51 PM PDT by
UncleSamUSA
(the land of the free and the home of the brave)
To: jdm
So anyone who is a shareholder in Schlumberger Ltd. or the Vanguard Wellington fund is supporting the atrocities in the Sudan? Sounds like a stretch.
To: jdm
absolute non-issue alert. these dopes ought to be completely ignored and anyone who pays attention to them ought to have his priorities questioned.
To: jdm
Wait - it gets better - Look who's on the SLB
Board. Think Pink Floyd's "The Wall."
13 posted on
05/18/2007 4:51:48 AM PDT by
sono
(TITVS PVLLO in MMVIII - Paid for by the Aventine Collegium for Pullo)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson