Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'La Raza' Has Virtual Veto Over Bill('practically in the room' during negotiations)
worldnetdaily.com ^ | May 18, 2007 | staff

Posted on 05/18/2007 7:01:58 PM PDT by kellynla

Controversial Latino groups, including the National Council of La Raza, were granted virtual veto power over the immigration bill hammered out yesterday by Senate Republicans, Democrats and the White House, the Washington Post reported.

A number of prominent Republicans have rejected the bill – which still has not been issued in its final form – as "amnesty" for millions of people who came to the U.S. illegally.

The National Council of La Raza, or "The Race," was condemned last year by Rep. Charles Norwood, R-Ga., as a radical "pro-illegal immigration lobbying organization that supports racist groups calling for the secession of the western United States as a Hispanic-only homeland."

Norwood, writing in Human Events, called on La Raza to renounce its support of the campus group MEChA – Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan – which sees "The Race" as part of a transnational ethnic group that one day will reclaim Aztlan, the mythical birthplace of the Aztecs. In Chicano folklore, Aztlan includes California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and parts of Colorado and Texas.

(Story continues below)

As WND reported, Norwood said last year the National Council of La Raza campaigned hard against a plan to provide funding, training and resources for state and local law enforcement agencies who help federal officers in capturing and detaining criminals who are illegal aliens.

"For those who haven't figured it out yet, the entire illegal immigration crisis we suffer is due 100 percent from failure to enforce existing law," Norwood said. "The other side (including La Raza) knows this very well, and knows that the continued suppression of U.S. law enforcement efforts is essential to permanently destroying our borders."

Regarding the new bill, Eric Gutierrez, lead lobbyist for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, or MALDEF, told the Post there's "a real sense that the Latino community is key to the solution in this debate, so now they are reaching out to us more than ever."

"Neither party wants to make a misstep politically," he said.

The Post said the Latino groups "were practically in the room" as Democratic and Republican senators negotiated the bill, which would grant quick legal status to millions of illegal immigrants, create a temporary worker program and increase border security.

Before criticism came rolling in, Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., insisted the bill is not "amnesty," but lawmakers such as Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, and Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., immediately applied that label.

King called it "a pardon and reward for lawbreakers," and DeMint declared, "I don't care how you try to spin it, this is amnesty."

Last year, Latino groups demonstrated their power by filling streets in cities across the nation when the House passed a bill that would have made illegal immigration a felony.

The Post noted La Raza, MALDEF, the League of United Latin American Citizens, or LULAC, and the National Immigration Forum are part of a broad network of immigrant rights groups that have been speaking daily with top aides in the offices of Democratic Sens. Ted Kennedy and Harry Reid, the Senate majority leader.

The bill promoted by Kennedy would allow illegal immigrants to come forward and obtain a "Z visa" that puts them on a track for permanent residency within eight to 13 years. Fees and a fine of $5,000 are required and heads of household first must return to their home countries.

The illegals would be able to obtain a probationary card right away to live and work in the U.S., but the path to citizenship cannot begin until completion of border improvements and the high-tech ID system.

The temporary worker program also would be delayed until the new security measures are in place. The workers would be required to return home after two years and would not be on a track for permanent status. The guest worker visas could be renewed twice, but the worker would be required to leave for one year between each renewal.

Democrats wanted guest workers to be allowed to stay indefinitely.

Two tough issues remain for which Kennedy's Latino "stakeholders" likely will have sway. Republicans and Democrats still are divided on whether 400,000 foreigners entering the country as temporary workers would have to leave the country after three years or be granted a chance to remain permanently, the Post reported. Also, the parties must resolve how extended family ties should be weighed in granting visas.

William Ramos, a spokesman for the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, told the Post his constituency would oppose elimination of "some aspects of family reunification" and also a policy that would force immigrants to return to their home countries for an extended period and to petition for reentry.

The White House held a meeting just over two weeks ago with Latino groups, and Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and Commerce Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez have had contact.

"At least they are paying attention to us," MALDEF President John Trasviña told the Post.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: amnesty; illegals; immigration; laraza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
As if we didn't have enough to piss us off about this amnesty bill...we find out this!!!
1 posted on 05/18/2007 7:02:01 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Just think: two months ago, Free Republic was crawling with open borders advocates just like them. People afraid of deporting them are still here in force.


2 posted on 05/18/2007 7:04:03 PM PDT by James W. Fannin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

La Raza, I do not get them. They want to reclaim the southwest for Mexico. (Some how they forget there was a war and Spain lost but oh well).
I have been to Mexico, why would they want the southwest of the US to be like that.


3 posted on 05/18/2007 7:09:19 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
It seems only Mexicans and al Qaeda hold sway at the US border tonight under President Bush and this Congress.


4 posted on 05/18/2007 7:14:44 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James W. Fannin
Well, the open borders folks can try this on for size:

Bush Swallows.

5 posted on 05/18/2007 7:15:21 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

TRASVINA, JOHN D
PASADENA , CA 91101
DISCRIMINATION RESEARCH CENTER/RESE MENENDEZ, ROBERT (D)
Senate - NJ
MENENDEZ FOR SENATE $250
general 10/23/06

Trasvina, John
Los Angeles, CA 90014
Mexican American Legal Defense and/ RODRIGUEZ, ROBERTO J (D)
House (CA 25)
RODRIGUEZ FOR CONGRESS $300
general 10/18/06

Trasvina, John D Mr.
San Francisco, CA 94132
Discrimination Research Center/Rese KERRY, JOHN F (D)
President
JOHN KERRY FOR PRESIDENT INC $500
primary 02/27/04

Trasvina, John D Mr.
San Francisco, CA 94132
Discrimination Research Center/Rese KERRY, JOHN F (D)
President
JOHN KERRY FOR PRESIDENT INC $250
primary 09/19/03

Trasvina, John Mr.
Washington, DC 20008
U.S. Department of Justice/Administ CASTRO, MARTIN R (D)
House (IL 04)
PEOPLE FOR MARTY CASTRO $500
primary 06/30/01

TRASVINA, JOHN
WASHINGTON, DC 20008
US DEPT OF JUSTICE BECERRA, XAVIER (D)
House (CA 31)
BECERRA FOR CONGRESS $1,000
general 10/12/00

TRASVINA, JOHN
WASHINGTON, DC 20008
IMMIGRATION-DEPT OF JUSTICE NEAS, RALPH G (D)
House (MD 08)
RALPH NEAS FOR CONGRESS $250
general 10/19/98


6 posted on 05/18/2007 7:15:32 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
MALDEF has had considerable success on this front, thanks to its former employee, John Trasvina, who has served as special counsel for immigration-related unfair employment practices in the Clinton-Gore Justice Department.
7 posted on 05/18/2007 7:17:03 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

John D. Trasviña was nominated by President Clinton and confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate in 1997 to be Special Counsel for Immigration Related Unfair Employment Practices. The Office of Special Counsel was established in 1987 to protect U.S. citizens and other work authorized individuals from employment discrimination based on immigration status. The Office litigates claims and educates employees, employers and the general public on their rights and responsibilities under the law in order to prevent such discrimination. As Special Counsel, Mr. Trasviña is now the highest ranking Hispanic attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice.

For three and three-quarter years, he served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs at the U.S. Department of Justice. From 1987 to 1993, he was counsel to Senator Paul Simon on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, the last 3 years as General Counsel and Staff Director to the Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution. In the Senate and in his previous post in the Administration, he handled numerous policy areas, including Civil Rights, Immigration and Judicial Nominations.

A native of San Francisco, Mr. Trasviña was Deputy City Attorney there from 1983 to 1985 and Legislative Counsel to the Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund in Washington D.C. from 1985 to 1987.


8 posted on 05/18/2007 7:18:45 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"Latino groups demonstrated their power by filling streets in cities across the nation when the House passed a bill that would have made illegal immigration a felony"

Sorta like a band of criminals publicly appearing and giving honest Americans the finger, isn't it?

Here's what these criminals think of American Citizens:


9 posted on 05/18/2007 7:20:05 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I feel like I just entered the twilight zone!

This country has been taken over by socialists.

And the party we all trusted has suddenly turned on the very people who voted them into office.

I am wishing that when I awaken fron this nightmare millions of illegals will be gone from this country.


10 posted on 05/18/2007 7:20:49 PM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

This is so simple. Build a real wall, enforce existing immigration laws. Any questions?


11 posted on 05/18/2007 7:21:01 PM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Christ's Kingdom on Earth is the answer. What is your question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Shoot these invaders.


12 posted on 05/18/2007 7:22:51 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (My Number One Goal in Life is to Leave a Bigger Carbon Foot Print Than Al Gore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: James W. Fannin

Yep, now where are all the people accusing us of being “Border Bots”, hmmm?


13 posted on 05/18/2007 7:24:10 PM PDT by ECM (Government is a make-work program for lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; EternalVigilance; T.L.Sink; Delphinium

This is appalling. And it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that this bill is worthless.


14 posted on 05/18/2007 7:24:18 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (If the GOP were to stop worshiping Free Trade as if it were a religion, they'd win every election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
A proposal in Hawthorne, California, that would require English to be used on most business signs is causing a stir. The proposal has been referred to the city planning commission for recommendation.

John Trasviña opposes forcing businesses to put up store signs in English.

15 posted on 05/18/2007 7:24:24 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Who cares what they think or do. They are as relevant to this argument and have as many supporters as the nazi party in america. they just seem lowder and aren't afraid to crawl out from under their rocks.


CALL! CALL! CALL! CALL! AND KEEP CALLING TILL THE LINES FRY!

WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! TILL YOU RUN OUT OF INK IN YOUR PEN!

STOP AMNESTY NOW!! WE CAN DO IT!!

16 posted on 05/18/2007 7:24:46 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ECM

We’re still the unappeasables to them. My tagline is back.


17 posted on 05/18/2007 7:26:18 PM PDT by James W. Fannin (unappeasable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
"Shoot these invaders."

I don't think you can post that on here, but, I sympathize with your disgust with the whole criminal amnesty issue.

My personal opinion is that offering $1000 per illegal alien identified and confirmed in a hearing and then deported would be cost-effective in the savings to taxpayers for education, medical, welfare, and fraudulent tax-funded giveaways to these cockroaches.

18 posted on 05/18/2007 7:26:40 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

bttt


19 posted on 05/18/2007 7:27:54 PM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Trasviña said that many complicated ballot provisions “demand a higher level of English language proficiency than do the naturalization requirements,” which require only a fifth-grade level of understanding.

To illustrate how complicated English ballots are, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) read part of a Colorado ballot. Senators joked during the question-and-answer session that even they had trouble understanding the “legalese” on ballots such as the one Kennedy read.


20 posted on 05/18/2007 7:28:33 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson