[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

I am in favor of Paul’s exclusion. Not because his ideas have no place in politics, but because they have no place in the Republican party.

Rudy Giuliani's views have no place in the Republican Party.

Ron Paul's non-interventionist foreign policy dates back to "Mr. Republican" Robert A. Taft himself. His views may be unpopular in these Neo-Conservative times, but at least they have a distinguished Conservative pedigree.

By contrast, Rudy Giuliani's Pro-Abortion, Pro-Homosexual, Pro-Gun Control, Pro-Illegal Immigration policies have NEVER been "Conservative" by ANY stretch of the imagination.

What, me Liberal?

IF ANYONE should be excluded from the Republican Debates, it should be the man(?) who sought, and received, the endorsement of the LIBERAL PARTY of New York -- ex-mayor Rudy Giuliani; NOT the man who was the Leader of Ronald Reagan's Electoral Delegation from Texas -- Congressman Ron Paul.

[samtheman]

Rudy is a proven vote-getter with an R by his name on a ballot. That alone qualifies him to participate in R-debates. By definition. Doesn’t mean he’s not RINO. Doesn’t mean he supports what you think he should support. But Rudy’s R-credentials are beyond reproach.

[The_Eaglet]

Rudy Giuliani's views have no place in the Republican Party.

Rudy Giuliani's views have no place in the Oval Office. If said views get to the White House, they should be rerouted to the dumpster.

[The_Eaglet]

Rudy Giuliani's views have no place in the Republican Party.

Rudy Giuliani's views have no place in the Oval Office. If said views get to the White House, they should be rerouted to the dumpster.

[niki]

They hate us because were beautiful. - Rudy