Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney SURGES ahead in Iowa!!! Double digit lead.
My Man Mitt.com ^ | 5/19/07 | Jeff Fuller

Posted on 05/20/2007 2:54:16 PM PDT by Reaganesque

The new Des Moines Register poll shows an AMAZING jump for Romney up to 30%!!! He has a double digit lead over Giuliani and McCain (17% and 18% respectively). This is among "Likely Republican Caucus-goers" and exclude unannounced possible candidates (F. Thompson and Newt namely).

However, these figures are far from "set in stone":

The race at this early stage could take many twists and turns before the Iowa finish line is reached in January.

Twelve percent of those polled are undecided or declare themselves uncommitted. Among those stating a preference, 87 percent say they could still be persuaded to support another candidate as their first choice.

Why is he surging? Some ideas below:

Romney’s front-runner status in the new Des Moines Register poll could stem in part from solid performances in the two national debates, his work in building a network of supporters in Iowa, his fundraising prowess and money spent on TV ads, said J. Ann Selzer, The Register’s pollster.

“His success raising money seems to have aroused caucusgoers’ interest, prompting them to take a serious look at the candidate,” Selzer said. “He’s helped by the top two qualifications Republican caucusgoers are looking for in a candidate — experience as a governor and as CEO.”

The poll shows Romney is regarded favorably by 74 percent of likely caucus participants and unfavorably by just 13 percent, with the rest unsure how they feel about him.

He does better in the poll among older Iowans, who tend to be more faithful in attending the caucuses, than he does among younger ones. Roughly one-third of those 55 or older make him their first choice, compared with support from about one-fifth of adults younger than 35.

Some opinions from participants:

Republican caucusgoers place a premium on a candidate who has experience as a governor, with 60 percent saying they are more likely to support a person with that experience on their resume.

“Just being elected out east, where the hard core of the Democrats are, speaks pretty highly of” Romney, said poll participant Edward Green, 57, of Davenport.

“He’s got a good family and his children are on the right track,” said Green, a minister who does missions work for Assemblies of God International.

Green wonders, however, whether Romney — a Mormon — can win the Republican nomination because of his religion. “People will poke and prod at his religion — a lot like they did with Kennedy in the ’60s.” John F. Kennedy, a Democrat, was the first Catholic elected president.

Most likely Republican caucus participants — 71 percent — say it makes no difference in their choice of a candidate if that person would be elected the first Mormon president. However, 22 percent say that would make their support for the candidate less likely.

Six percent say electing the first Mormon president would make them more apt to support that person and 1 percent are unsure.

-----

Iowa is a nice microcosm proving that those who get to know Romney . . . like Romney. His campaign is picking up steam and will be hard to derail. Full steam ahead to the Ames Straw Poll!!!


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fred; fredthompson; iowa; lead; poll; romney; runfredrun; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-350 next last
To: Old_Mil

>>Romney still has done nothing to address his extensive support of the gay agenda as governor of Massachusetts.<<

Support?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjC4lQ90Sas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJXyDxMKv1E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXUE7VHeaTc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVrZf0bWobw

Perhaps we need to find out exactly what you mean by support, Old_Mil. I’m afraid my dictionary is failing me.


21 posted on 05/20/2007 3:21:57 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

Actually, the fact that Romney doesn’t believe in treating gays and lesbians as second class citizens makes me apt to support him more. I have friends who are gay and while I favor a federal marriage amendment, I don’t believe they should be denied the same basic rights that I enjoy. I don’t agree with the gay lifestyle at all, but that’t not really my place to judge.

Romney stated he is opposed to discrimination and I’m glad for it.


22 posted on 05/20/2007 3:23:58 PM PDT by VegasBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

Hunter. As full a suit as there ever was.


23 posted on 05/20/2007 3:30:34 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel
What support did Governor Romney give the gay agenda?

Homosexual "Rights"

Gov. Romney has a long history of promoting and furthering the homosexual agenda, and working closely with leading gay activists

Romney twice sought and received the endorsement of the homosexual Log Cabin Republican Club

Romney's campaign distributed pro-gay rights campaign literature during Boston's "Gay Pride" events

Romney supports homosexual "anti-discrimination" laws

Such laws are usually carried out at the expense of freedom of religion and speech. For example, they would allow lawsuits against a Christian book store owner for refusing to hire a homosexual activist applicant.

Romney advocates homosexual couples' adoption rights be recognized by the government

Romney supports homosexual domestic partnerships

Romney supported and promoted legalizing homosexual civil unions

Romney Opposes the Boy Scouts' Ban on Homosexual Scoutmasters

Romney barred Boy Scouts from public participation in 2002 Olympics

Homosexual activism in government

Romney appointed prominent homosexuals to key positions in his administration

Romney appointed prominent homosexual activists and Democrats as judges

Romney Rewards one of the State's Leading Anti-Marriage Attorneys by Making him a Judge

Romney announces he won't fill judicial vacancies before term ends

Romney's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth used huge taxpayer funding to promote homosexuality in the public schools

Romney's Commission organized public gay "Youth Pride Day" parades and "transgender proms" which promote unhealthy and risky behavior

Romney issues a proclamation celebrating gay "Youth Pride Day"

Romney's Department of Education promotes the homosexual agenda

Romney's Department of Public Health (DPH) cooperates with the homosexual activist movement

Romney opposed federal legislation that would stop public schools from promoting homosexuality

Romney's Dept. of Social Services honors homosexual "married" couple as adoptive "Parents of the Year"

Homosexual "Marriage"

Romney refused to endorse the original 2002 Mass. constitutional amendment absolutely defining marriage as one man and one women

Romney unnecessarily (and unconstitutionally) implemented homosexual marriages in Massachusetts

Romney had marriage licenses changed to allow same-sex marriages

Romney administration ordered Justices of Peace to perform homosexual "marriages" when asked - or be fired!

Romney administration's training of Town Clerks (on how to issue same-sex marriage licenses) states that marriage statutes were not changed

Romney signs bill eliminating Sexual Transmitted Disease (STD) testing requirement for marriage

When requested of him, Romney personally issues special one-day certificates to allow otherwise unqualified people to perform homosexual "marriages"

Was Romney's public opposition to homosexual "marriage" based on expediency, not principle?

The Mitt Romney Deception
24 posted on 05/20/2007 3:36:20 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Any politician who supports amnesty is deader politically than Teddy Kennedy's liver...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel; EternalVigilance

“David Parker’s dilemma … threatens the parental rights and religious freedom of every Massachusetts parent, and indirectly every parent in America,” said John Haskins of the Parents’ Rights Coalition.

“As the Lexington schools themselves are arguing, the state’s right to force pro-homosexuality indoctrination on other people’s children arises directly from former Gov. Mitt Romney’s nakedly false and unconstitutional declaration that homosexual marriage is now legal.”

Haskins said when the Massachusetts state Supreme Court demanded homosexual marriages in the state, it didn’t have the constitutional or legal authority to order the governor to act or to order the Legislature to make any changes, and the creation of same-sex marriages in Massachusetts actually was accomplished by executive order from Romney.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54420

Looks like a few folks in Mass think Romney was less than stellar at opposing the gay agenda.


25 posted on 05/20/2007 3:42:03 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pissant

More than a few.


26 posted on 05/20/2007 3:43:17 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Any politician who supports amnesty is deader politically than Teddy Kennedy's liver...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Good work. You should add the verbiage from the link I put up there to your documentation.


27 posted on 05/20/2007 3:45:09 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pissant

It’s someone else’s work. I don’t believe in reinventing wheels. ;-)


28 posted on 05/20/2007 3:47:57 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Any politician who supports amnesty is deader politically than Teddy Kennedy's liver...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

Read Hugh Hewitt’s book: “A Mormon in the Whitehouse.” The book, which I am reading right now, talks extensively about the gay issue, and Mitt’s stance for marriage and the people’s power to have a say what are the laws of the land. Read the book. Get informed. Then make your decision.


29 posted on 05/20/2007 3:48:16 PM PDT by bethtopaz (Stop Global Whining!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bethtopaz
Mitt’s stance for marriage and the people’s power to have a say what are the laws of the land.

Pffft. Romney is a judicial supremacist.

30 posted on 05/20/2007 3:48:59 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Any politician who supports amnesty is deader politically than Teddy Kennedy's liver...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bethtopaz; Old_Mil

Hugh has been shilling for Romney since the gitgo. Kinda like Sean hannity interviewing Rudy. LOL


31 posted on 05/20/2007 3:50:00 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom

Okay. So Romney went and rescued some people in the water. And do you think that was his motivating factor in going out of his way to save those drowning souls? Come on! Give me a break! Give Mitt Romney a break. He’s just a good guy, with good morals, who cares about others. GET. THE. FACTS. ABOUT. MITT!!


32 posted on 05/20/2007 3:50:51 PM PDT by bethtopaz (Stop Global Whining!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; Admin Moderator

This would be considered “spamming the thread.”

Unless you typed all of it in just now.


33 posted on 05/20/2007 3:51:26 PM PDT by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

I’m not so concerned with his support of the gay agenda in a state where they are so powerful a force of influence.

What concerns me greatly is he is not much different from his father, the once governor of Michigan, who called are forefathers in the conservative movement, extremists who used terror as a tool to scare people into voting for them.

Like father, like son....


34 posted on 05/20/2007 3:51:40 PM PDT by Schwaeky (Just say NO to Union Food (Kroger, etc) and say yes to Home Delivery..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: redhead

Very superficial reasoning to me. Now you sound like a democRAT!


35 posted on 05/20/2007 3:51:50 PM PDT by bethtopaz (Stop Global Whining!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch; Clemenza; JohnnyZ
"What is the Precious Willard stuff?"

My question exactly every time this $3 phony pops up.

"Is that supposed to be cute or something?"

As cute as his rodent counterpart, the Breck Girl.

"As to ego, that is again a throwaway swipe, that can be used for anyone bothering to run for President."

Precious also shares the distinction with Gore of watching their daddies be soundly rebuffed in their quests for the Presidency. It distorted their egos beyond all comprehension. Fact is, nobody asked Precious to run for President. He didn't finish his job in Ratsachusetts. He cut and run. We don't reward losers with the Presidency, not in the GOP at least.

"I guess since Thompson hasn't bothered yet, he can't be accused."

Fred, unlike Precious, is a draftee. We won't have a real contest until he officially enters, and then it's all over in this contest of egotistical RINO midgets.

"Mitt has done better for the MA GOP than GWB for the US GOP."

What are you smoking ? The MA GOP is DEAD, and he nailed the coffin lid shut. Precious FAILED to increase (in fact, it SHRANK on his watch) upon the 11% GOP membership in the legislature. 11% (!). Far below the GOP party registration in the state. He FAILED to help elect a SINGLE GOP federal official. He left a hapless Lieutenant to carry the party banner against a racist Marxist rodent all in his quest to satisfy his appetite for the Presidency. He FAILED to campaign for our party members in the state in the past election, leaving them to twist in the wind. Now when Dubya reduces our national GOP to below 11% membership in Congress (or zero in Precious's case) and hands Hillary (or Smiley) the Presidency on a silver platter as Precious handed the Governorship to Coupe deVal, you come back and make that claim. It may truly be the most absurd statement I've read this year, if not this century.

"And what has Fred Thompson done for any GOP lately? As a TN Senator? Nothing comes to mind, maybe you can fill us in."

Now you're just being ignorant. Fred didn't abandon his state and party as Precious did, and instead actively and aggressively campaigned for our federal GOP officeholders. His DIRECT intervention in our Senate race last year kept the seat from going to the rodents (Smiley Light AKA Junior Ford). Since he wasn't a Governor, his responsibilities aren't the same, but he surely helped out after he had left office, even when he wasn't obliged to do so. Precious was obliged to, and didn't do a damn thing. Like I said, some are called to greatness and some think they're great. Rudy McRomney are most certainly the latter.

36 posted on 05/20/2007 3:52:38 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Would you vote for President a guy who married his cousin? Me, neither. Accept no RINOs. Fred in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Not too sure about Romney...in 2000, GWB seemed like a conservative too. Romney’s weak on guns and dicey on abortion. But I’d vote for him over Giuliani or McCain, and over any Democrat to come down the pike.


37 posted on 05/20/2007 3:53:40 PM PDT by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bethtopaz

OK. How about it’s tough to trust someone who is an obvious metrosexual.


38 posted on 05/20/2007 3:53:42 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Mitt’s dad was actually a highly competant governor of Michigan (who got screwed over by LBJ during the Detroit Riots), who nevertheless was prone to sleep-inducing speeches and the occassional gaffe (”I was brainwashed!”). In some ways, he was the Republican answer to Edmund Sixtus Marcejewski of Maine...


39 posted on 05/20/2007 3:54:46 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Actually, it’s called “telling the truth.” Precious is a $3 phony. Don’t you Willardistas realize he will SAY anything to get nominated ? You guys cannot be that gullible to fall for it.


40 posted on 05/20/2007 3:55:10 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Would you vote for President a guy who married his cousin? Me, neither. Accept no RINOs. Fred in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-350 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson