Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House fires back: Jimmy Carter 'irrelevant'
Worldnetdaily ^ | May 20, 2007 | May 20, 2007

Posted on 05/20/2007 5:08:54 PM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: SJackson

Carter was just trying to shift the “Worst President in History” mantle to someone else. Too bad, Jimma, I think it’s yours for at least another hundred years or so.


21 posted on 05/20/2007 5:46:11 PM PDT by TX Bluebonnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Carter gave us the current irredentist Iranian regime. He should be TOTALLY irrelevant.


22 posted on 05/20/2007 5:47:56 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush

I do remember the News Media called Florida for Gore when only 1 percent of the votes had come in. I thought I didn’t see right


23 posted on 05/20/2007 5:50:24 PM PDT by Kaslin (Fred Thompson for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
The Republican party was founded in 1854. A scant six years later it won the Presidency. What is it about politics today that prevents third party alternatives from achieving such high office?

Money, and the way it's funneled, or not funneled to the political process.

Bloomberg can run an effective third party campaign, just as Perot was able.

Bill Gates, he could give it a shot, as could Forbes or even Oprah.

While he wasn't my cup of tea, nor were his opinions, nor what the lead to, a bomber pilot by the name of McGovern did change the political landscape in 1968. Financed by a Ford scion as I recall, which was no secret.

Couldn't happen today, Mel Gibson can spend his money on a run for President, but not in support of, take your pick, whatever third party candidate.

As each piece of legislation passes, we become more and more entrenched in two parties. I'm sure that's an accident.

Should note again that the founding of the Republican Party in Ripon was 150 years ago. I'm not sure 3rd parties will emerge often, TR couldn't do it, but CFR does supress minority views.

24 posted on 05/20/2007 5:52:59 PM PDT by SJackson (Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
IF Bush pushes Amnesty he will make Jimmy Carter look like Ronald Reagan.

Reagan did amnesty. It will be forgotten. If GWB is looking to it as a legacy builder, it will be forgotten. People don't value what they don't work for.

25 posted on 05/20/2007 5:54:59 PM PDT by SJackson (Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TX Bluebonnet
Carter was just trying to shift the “Worst President in History” mantle to someone else. Too bad, Jimma, I think it’s yours for at least another hundred years or so.

Long after carter is dead, I and others of my generation will continue to spread the true story that jimmy carter was and still is the worst president in U.S. history (lower case intentional 'cause he warrants no respect). He f'ed up the country real bad.

Every week the price of bread, milk, eggs and other essential items went up, what with double-digit inflation... while carter made it worse! We truly suffered under this idiot, and I cursed him and hope he will rot in hell. (Of course things got supremely better for my young family under President Reagan.)

26 posted on 05/20/2007 5:56:22 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

It’s been said before but it’s due to Jimmy Carter that we are stuck with the Middle East the way it is now.

The man is a complete putz without any character and no ethics.

Jimmy, be a man, if you can, and own up to your complete and utter foreign policy failures during your reign.


27 posted on 05/20/2007 5:56:59 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Say NO to an illegal amnesty!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"I think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around the world, this administration has been the worst in history."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Just imagine, this from a President who, in the midst of a centuries long trend marking the global advance of democracy, oversaw the most extensive reversals of that trend of any modern President (excepting conquests lost but later regained in the world wars). A short list would have to include Afghanistan, Angola, Ethiopia, Mozambique, South Yemen, Libya, Syria, Aden, The Congo, Madagascar, The Seychelles, Nicaragua, and Grenada. And those were just the states where Soviet influence was secured or markedly avanced under Carter's watch. It doesn't even include states like Iran that went (more or less) independently rouge.

OTOH, you'd have to consider Carter a proven authority on being the WORST President in history.

28 posted on 05/20/2007 6:09:26 PM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Personally, I think this is being way too mean to all the “irrelevants” out there. Carter has to rise a bit to be called “irrelevant”.


29 posted on 05/20/2007 6:11:49 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("You ask, 'What is our aim?' I can answer in one word: VICTORY - victory - at all costs...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

How could Jimmah Carter become more irellevant? I think that would be impossible.


30 posted on 05/20/2007 6:17:21 PM PDT by sig226 (Where did my tag line go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Carter is as ugly a stain on the American presidency as he is on the human gene pool. It’s obvious that Billy got the brains, the common sense and the good looks in that family. Jimmy should follow Billy’s example.


31 posted on 05/20/2007 6:18:22 PM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"[Gore] received the most votes nationwide,

Which has nothing at all to do with who becomes president.

And as to FL Jimmy. Your mind is one thing but reality is another.
32 posted on 05/20/2007 6:20:16 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

George W. Bush is still the president. How irrelevant is that?

sheeesh


33 posted on 05/20/2007 6:27:49 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (Armed men are citizens, unarmed men subjects. Gun control is about CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If Carter had the good sense to shut up for a couple of years he may find that he isn’t considered the worst president of all time. His idiotic rantings keep him one notch below Bush. Maybe Bush has him on the payroll.


34 posted on 05/20/2007 6:29:14 PM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"[Gore] received the most votes nationwide, and in my opinion, he also received the most votes in Florida," Carter continued. "And the decision was made as you know by a 5-4 vote on a highly partisan basis by the U.S. Supreme Court..."

Mister Peanut is, as usual, wrong. The Florida results were certified and the SCOTUS had nothing to do with "choosing" the president.

35 posted on 05/20/2007 6:29:34 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (Armed men are citizens, unarmed men subjects. Gun control is about CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Hit ‘em again, Hit’em again! I think the Islamo-fascists would agree with the “Pansy from Plains”, George Bush is their worst nightmare.


36 posted on 05/20/2007 6:40:10 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

The principle foundation of demo-groupthink is conceit. They’re incapable of reason.


37 posted on 05/20/2007 6:45:44 PM PDT by Loud Mime ("It is not intellect which makes a great scientist; it is character." Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
What is it about politics today that prevents third party alternatives from achieving such high office?

$$$$$$$$

38 posted on 05/20/2007 6:49:46 PM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I am very much pro-life, but if there was ever an argument for abortion, he would be it. If only I could go back in time.


39 posted on 05/20/2007 6:54:57 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

“I can’t wait to empty my bladder repeatedly on this asshats grave!”

I guess we should all expect a line.


40 posted on 05/20/2007 6:56:40 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson