Skip to comments.
Dems to send Bush no-timeline war bill
AP on Yahoo ^
| 5/21/07
| David Espo - ap
Posted on 05/21/2007 1:14:27 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-143 next last
To: jveritas
who do you support for Pres in 08?
81
posted on
05/21/2007 4:01:07 PM PDT
by
votelife
(we need 60 conservative senators)
To: Omega Man II
They blinked. This Iraq fight has been dragging the Dems down in the polls, along with Bush. They want to move on to their domestic pet causes.
...like making the unions who helped them during the last election happy?
82
posted on
05/21/2007 4:05:03 PM PDT
by
dr_who_2
To: deebee1
"The Dems dont want to actually impact anything in Iraq. That would make them responsible for the results. Granted, the majority of Americans appear to want the war over. However, lets say them Dems cut off funding, Bush brings the troops back home, and a massive civil war breaks out in Iraq drawing in Turkey, Syria, Iran, etc. (the likely result of removing troops now) Hundreds of thousands dead, massive ethnic cleansing, not to mention possible terrorist strikes on the U.S. If that occurs, what will the American public think of the Dems move to pull the troops out? They will likely view them as incompetent and that will impact the results of the 2008 election."That makes sense.
To: guido911
I think many are too disgusted to even chime in at DU.
Should be a fun thread over there.
84
posted on
05/21/2007 4:29:26 PM PDT
by
listenhillary
(Democrats are sacrificing civilization for political power)
To: 3AngelaD
Yes, the payment to Democrats is in AMNESTY bill.
85
posted on
05/21/2007 4:31:11 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
To: NormsRevenge
I’m concerned.
The RATS are caving on a timeline.
The Senate caved on immediate passage of the amnesty bill.
Are they putting something different in the water in Wash DC?
86
posted on
05/21/2007 4:49:06 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(Who will support Fred Thompson? Anyone who enjoys a dose of common sense not wrapped in doublespeak.)
To: NormsRevenge
87
posted on
05/21/2007 5:01:26 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Defeat the traitor McCain for President. Job #1.)
To: WorkerbeeCitizen
“hmmmm - Amnesty bill for a war budget bill? Hmmmm”
Bush has always wanted amnesty for his preferred people.
88
posted on
05/21/2007 5:04:31 PM PDT
by
FredHunter08
(Guiliani! Come and Take Them!)
To: Rummyfan
“Now if that immigration reform abomination comes to your desk, VETO IT!!!!!”
Veto his own bill? Why would he do that?
89
posted on
05/21/2007 5:05:34 PM PDT
by
FredHunter08
(Guiliani! Come and Take Them!)
To: VRWC For Truth
“All hat no cattle.”
The accent is fake too.
90
posted on
05/21/2007 5:06:15 PM PDT
by
FredHunter08
(Guiliani! Come and Take Them!)
To: ClarenceThomasfan
I wouldn’t count on that - even if Bush cared that much about the GOP.
It was Republicans who got the Civil Rights Act passed while Gore’s father and Clinton’s mentor, Fullbright - both dim senators - among many other dim senators tried their best to stop it.
It was Lincoln - the first Republican president who freed the slaves. Yet who do blacks knee jerk to - the DIM party.
The truth is what the dim media and the skoolz say it is. They’ve done a very good job of re-writing history and they will do the same with their new illegal voters.
91
posted on
05/21/2007 5:19:08 PM PDT
by
Let's Roll
(As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
To: votelife
My favorite guy has not announced yet and that is Senator Fred Thompson. I hope he will announce soon, the 4th of July will be a great timing. From the current crowd, I “prefer” Mitt Romney followed by Duncan Hunter.
92
posted on
05/21/2007 5:46:51 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: DevSix
Facts are becoming a major problem with some freepers my FRiend DevSix.
93
posted on
05/21/2007 5:49:37 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: NormsRevenge
If it is a top priority to give a minimum wage increase, why did the Democrats not support it LAST year when the Republicans were pushing it?
To: 3AngelaD
Bush shocked the hell out of’em by not caving like the prison b!+ch he is on domestic issues. They’re probably still stuttering in disbelief: “b-b-b-but h-he *always* caves in to take the blame himself!”
Not on foreign policies, ladies...
95
posted on
05/21/2007 7:18:17 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: NormsRevenge
I’m thinking there was a trade-off here for the immigration legislation.
96
posted on
05/21/2007 7:24:17 PM PDT
by
modyoulater
(Everything is everything.)
To: 3AngelaD
That’s exactly what I was thinking !! LOL!
Then I thought maybe it was some kind of joke!
If this is true .. the left’s “kooks” will be raging mad.
97
posted on
05/21/2007 7:26:51 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
("... first time in history the U.S. House has attempted to surrender via C-SPAN TV ...")
To: modyoulater
“Im thinking there was a trade-off here for the immigration legislation.”
No tradeoff required. He just has a Congress he can work with now.
98
posted on
05/21/2007 7:27:15 PM PDT
by
FredHunter08
(Guiliani! Come and Take Them!)
To: modyoulater
Im thinking there was a trade-off here for the immigration legislation.What trade-off?
President has always been for what is in the immigration bill.
No, this was a win for the President.
To: HamiltonJay
Dems are severely overplaying their hand.
Absolutely.
100
posted on
05/21/2007 7:35:21 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-143 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson