Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Ruling Could Have Chilling Effect On Organ Donations (Govt OWNS you!)
KIRO 7 Eyewitness News Investigative Reporter ^ | May 23, 2007 | Chris Halsne

Posted on 05/24/2007 10:50:43 PM PDT by RedQuill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Old_Mil
I’ve seen too many transplant-related types in healthcare behave in ways that were unprofessional at best.

That's why I've said no when asked and advised others to say no to the driver's license note. I want the decision made by my family --- yes, even in their time of grief.

21 posted on 05/25/2007 3:50:59 AM PDT by eccentric (a.k.a. baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TheSarce; RedQuill
Pinged from Terri Dailies

8mm


22 posted on 05/25/2007 4:00:20 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedQuill
A King County judge has just ruled that "heart-mark" allows your organs not just to be transplanted into a living person, but also your corpse donated to science.

I've never believed otherwise. I listened to this issue yesterday on local talk radio and couldn't believe the hysterics.

23 posted on 05/25/2007 8:22:49 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eccentric; HairOfTheDog
I want the decision made by my family --- yes, even in their time of grief.

I would rather my family respect my decision. I really don't give a rat's ass what happens to my body when I'm dead... I'm not using it any more.

However, I will agree that if there is a profit to be made, I'd like my family to partake in that.

24 posted on 05/25/2007 8:28:20 AM PDT by ecurbh (Giuliani 2008 - http://www.rudygforamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: eccentric
I want the decision made by my family --- yes, even in their time of grief.

I actually agree that in the absence of a clear directive these critical decisions should be made by the family. Of course, many of the 'Terri-bots' disagree. They think most families can't be trusted to not just kill grandma if someone isn't watching.

We are all the beneficiaries of scientific study. I don't get the outrage over the taking of tissues... I can understand the money aspect, but on the other hand, public agencies finding revenue that didn't come from taxpayers isn't a wholly bad thing either.

25 posted on 05/25/2007 8:37:40 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha

I think the families should receive a very sizable portion of the money collected, since the government are making money on the deal.


26 posted on 05/25/2007 9:52:04 AM PDT by thebaron512
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thebaron512

People, please stop directing it at me.

Read my entire posting.


27 posted on 05/25/2007 10:40:58 AM PDT by MacDorcha (Peace is not the highest goal - freedom is. -LachlanMinnesota)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

“Donated to Science” is not the same as “Sold for $1.5M profit to King County”. Hell—you live here...you should know the County Exec would carve people’s brains out himself if he could fund a light rail system with them.


28 posted on 05/25/2007 11:31:39 AM PDT by RedQuill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RedQuill

Once I’m dead, my body is nothing more than a container of water and some minerals.

If science can make use of said bag of chemicals to further human quality of life down stream, have at it.


29 posted on 05/25/2007 11:34:30 AM PDT by roaddog727 (BullS##t does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedQuill
“Sold for $1.5M profit to King County”

Yes, but they were Patty Murray voters, and the scandal here is that somebody paid way too much...

30 posted on 05/25/2007 11:36:56 AM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RedQuill

I think people who are outraged are upset on two fronts... Some seem to be upset and surprised to find out that all ‘organ donation’ is not for direct implant... they would give a heart to a person, but not a brain, bone, tissue, or whatever, for research. That’s the part I don’t understand why they have a problem.

As to why and how much money changes hands and for whom, Well, I guess that needs to be up for debate. But most of the talk I heard on the radio seemed to be shocked at the mere thought that tissues would be taken for anything other than live organ transplant, like it was a horrid misuse. I don’t think it is.

When my mom was dying from cancer, she was REALLY disappointed that her body was of no value to research. She thought they’d want to study her organs and learn something toward a cure, but I guess they didn’t need or want them, and as a cancer patient, they didn’t even want to take things like corneas or skin. She said “Can’t I even make a good skeleton for a classroom?” “No, most classroom skeletons these days are plastic”. This issue of fair and unfair use does not bother everyone, bless her heart.


31 posted on 05/25/2007 11:43:07 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RedQuill

Thanks for posting. Very interesting. BTTT!


32 posted on 05/25/2007 11:45:36 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedQuill

I am a donor also. However when I think of the term “donor” my impression is they can take what they want but I have no intention of anyone making any money off my “donation”.

I’ll be checking the regs and rules on this in my state before my license comes up for renewal. If there is any chance anyone is going to make money from my organs or tissue, it is going to be my family and no one else.


33 posted on 05/25/2007 11:50:39 AM PDT by SolidRedState (I Love TEXAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

The real issue here is “informed consent”. We need to have a system in Washington State to make our wishes known. You should be able to donate your body to science if that fits with your beliefs. Someone else should be able to choose either to donate for transplant, research or not at all. But above all, the least we can do for our dying loved ones, is to follow the wishes they have requested and let them rest in peace.


34 posted on 05/29/2007 10:25:41 AM PDT by nancehhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Troll

I lost both my kidneys when I was in India and woke up in a bathtub that was REAL cold.


35 posted on 05/29/2007 10:34:35 AM PDT by Safetgiver (Stinko De mayo, Stinko to the Commies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Safetgiver
I lost both my kidneys when I was in India and woke up in a bathtub that was REAL cold.

Wow! Have you found them yet? Kidneys are known to wander off and become confused...

36 posted on 05/29/2007 10:36:50 AM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson