[keats5]

“To resolve this as it fits ID, someone (actually many scientists) will have to put forth a testable hypothesis, test it, replicate and do it again and again with the same theme but with variation as they suggest themselves by the data. That has not been done and that’s why ID does not rise to the level of science.”

So, to paraphrase your own words, for evolution to rise to the level of science, scientists would need to repeatedly replicate random evolutionary changes from one species to another?

How exactly does one ensure pure randomness in a clinically controlled setting? There mere fact that a study is underway implies intelligent design.

[Rudder]

How exactly does one ensure pure randomness in a clinically controlled setting?

In the assignment of subjects or the assignment of various treatments, a table of random numbers is often used as one of many approaches.