Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Right On!: A classic case of 'battered-nation syndrome'
Jerusalem Post ^ | May 29, 2007 | Michael Freund

Posted on 05/29/2007 3:45:55 PM PDT by Alouette

It was 40 years ago next week that tiny little Israel, facing destruction at the hands of its enemies, miraculously emerged triumphant from the 1967 Six Day War. Existential fear quickly dissolved into breathtaking joy as the Jewish state decisively vanquished its foes, reuniting Jerusalem and reclaiming large swathes of our ancient homeland.

Our adversaries, who had gleefully pledged to feed us to the fish in the Mediterranean Sea, were forced to look on as their troops beat a hasty and humiliating retreat.

The stunning victory of 1967 had all the markings of Divine intervention. It was a gift from Heaven to a besieged and beleaguered people. After nearly two millennia we were reunited at last with the cradle of Jewish civilization in Judea and Samaria, and with the heart of the nation, the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

And yet, it seems, four decades later, many Israelis still just cannot forgive themselves for winning.

In what has become an annual ritual, a variety of media pundits, left-wing activists and even some officials launch into mournful sessions of hand-wringing and breast-beating. They bemoan the outcome of the Six Day War, grumble about Israel's success in reclaiming Judea, Samaria and Gaza, and sound as if they would have preferred going down in defeat.

Displaying an extraordinary lack of appreciation and an exceptional lack of historical perspective, these critics long to give up the hard-earned fruits of that war of self-defense, all in the vain hope of mollifying an incorrigible foe.

HOW COULD so many forget so much in so short a time? Even now, as Palestinians fire rockets daily at southern Israel from the very same Gaza Strip that we handed over to them two years ago, the proponents of appeasement still refuse to acknowledge the error of their ways.

It seems the only way to explain this phenomenon is to borrow a term from psychology: Certain parts of the Israeli public and its leadership are clearly suffering from what I refer to as "Battered Nation Syndrome." Like a victim of ongoing domestic abuse, the advocates of surrender to the Palestinians cannot muster the wherewithal to hit back at the abuser. All the hallmarks of the syndrome are there.

Naturally, this distorted world-view results in an almost obsessive focus on Israel's perceived faults as lying at the root of the conflict with our neighbors.

Consequently, the actions of the Palestinians are downplayed and minimized, excused and ignored, and Israel's policy-making process instead begins to resemble a good, ol'-fashioned. self-inflicted guilt trip.

But it is time to break out of this collective funk and start viewing the world the way it really is.

TO BEGIN with, Israel should stop apologizing for defeating the Arab states in 1967. Like any other nation, we have the right to defend ourselves, and we have the right not to be thrown in the sea.

What many of the defeatists conveniently choose to ignore is what led up to the 1967 war: increased Palestinian terror, massive Arab military buildups, and public threats by Arab leaders to annihilate the Jewish state.

They also forget that two years prior to 1967, back when Israel did not yet "occupy" the territories, prime minister Levi Eshkol put forward a proposal that could have resolved the Arab-Israeli conflict once and for all.

Speaking to the Knesset on May 17, 1965, Eshkol suggested turning the 1949 armistice agreements into peace treaties, and offered to hold direct talks with the Arab states in order to do so.

Pointing out that Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, combined, had 60 times the land area of the Jewish state, the premier noted that there was no logical reason for the Arabs to continue to pursue war. Instead, he offered a vision of peace that included open borders, bilateral trade, economic cooperation and freedom of access to the holy sites.

All he asked in return, said Eshkol, was "full respect for the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of all the States in the region."

But Israel's offer of peace was met two years later with a clear and unequivocal Arab response. Egypt and Syria mobilized their armies and their people, and vowed to destroy the Jewish state.

Hence, Israel neither asked for war nor initiated it in 1967, so let's stop acting like we did. We do not owe the Arabs anything for defeating them, and we certainly do not need to give them any further territory from which to attack us.

They tried to kill us. We won. Get over it.


TOPICS: Extended News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: israel

1 posted on 05/29/2007 3:45:57 PM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; 2ndDivisionVet; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; af_vet_rr; agrace; albyjimc2; ...
FReepMail to be added or removed from this pro-Israel/Judaic/Russian Jewry ping list.

Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.

2 posted on 05/29/2007 3:46:21 PM PDT by Alouette (Vicious Babushka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

btt


3 posted on 05/29/2007 4:07:59 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Resulting in calls by Ralph Nadar for Egyptian tanks to be equipped with back-up lights:-)


4 posted on 05/29/2007 4:08:59 PM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

‘battered-nation syndrome’

What a great name for America today.


5 posted on 05/29/2007 4:15:58 PM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
I date my beginning as a political junkie from the 1967 war. At the tender age of 13 I told a an incredulous gathering of family adults that the Israeli attack was justified. Arab forces had blockaded the Israeli port of Aqueba (sp). It was a legitimate causas belli if ever there was.

The only downside is that Israel did not kill many, many more barbarians.

6 posted on 05/29/2007 4:21:54 PM PDT by Jacquerie (All Muslims are suspect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Just as the CHildren of Israel failed, in the Book of Joshua, to completely drive out all of the pagan Canaanites who were involved in Child sacrifice, idol worshipping, etc.


7 posted on 05/29/2007 4:41:00 PM PDT by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
The stunning victory of 1967 had all the markings of Divine intervention. It was a gift from Heaven to a besieged and beleaguered people. After nearly two millennia we were reunited at last with the cradle of Jewish civilization in Judea and Samaria, and with the heart of the nation, the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

And yet, it seems, four decades later, many Israelis still just cannot forgive themselves for winning.

Wow! That's making it about as plain as a person can!

Never was a victory less exploited. G-d handed the heart of 'Eretz HaQodesh to the Goy Qadosh and they gave the holiest spot on earth to the moslems and refused to annex the Biblical Heartland from the very beginning, insisting on a temporary "occupation" for the protection of "Israel Proper" (by which, apparently, they meant the Philistine Coast).

This rejection of what can only have been an offer of Redemption is the greatest failure of secular Jewish nationalism.

8 posted on 05/29/2007 5:21:09 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator ("Qumah HaShem, veyafutzu 'oyeveykha, veyanusu mesan'eykha mippaneykha!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Israel never had a port at Aqaba. Aqaba is and was a Jordanian port within three miles or so from the Israeli port of Eilat. Both ports are located on the Gulf of Aqaba, which is a gulf of the Red Sea.

So the Arabs likely blockaded the Gulf of Aqaba, so that Israel couldn't ship into and out of Eilat.

You're correct in everything else you say, except your geography.

9 posted on 05/29/2007 5:36:49 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Outstanding piece by Michael Freund - no relation to Sigmund, I presume!


10 posted on 05/29/2007 5:38:58 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
no relation to Sigmund

Siegmund's last name was Freud (German word for "joy"), not Freund (German word for "Friend").

11 posted on 05/29/2007 5:45:19 PM PDT by Alouette (Vicious Babushka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Yes, I realized that a second after I posted it. Please forgive me for the bad joke. I guess one letter can make a big difference anyway.


12 posted on 05/29/2007 5:59:35 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

The Egyptians blockaded the Straits of Tiran, a bit further south..


13 posted on 05/29/2007 7:40:59 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

14 posted on 05/29/2007 9:25:20 PM PDT by SJackson (Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

btt


15 posted on 05/29/2007 9:30:49 PM PDT by Marie (Unintended consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
I guess one letter can make a big difference anyway.

So true!

Call me Ishmael.

Call me, Ishmael.

Ball me Ishmael.

16 posted on 05/30/2007 3:45:55 AM PDT by Frank Fencepost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Sorry, at the time the port was called Aqaba in the press.


17 posted on 05/30/2007 4:29:38 AM PDT by Jacquerie (All Muslims are suspect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson