Hillary supported Edward Ned Lamont against Lieberman, and IIRC, she also help raise money for him.
Please read the entire article before posting.
You will see the ACLU in this article as well.
[snip]
When one talks about a "New World Religion", a similar analytical approach is necessary. While those in the global religious movement are quick to discuss global political governance issues, those in the global economic and/or global political world more often side-step religious questions as being "private issues", and simply deny any goals of bringing about a unified, global religion of any sort.
As we examine this subject, one cannot help but note how the American court system is fanatically removing every semblance of Judeo-Christian symbolism from public places using the argument of "Separation of Church and State." In spite of the fact that America's heritage is deeply rooted in simple concepts like the Ten Commandments, these are now persona non grata. To the global elite however, there apparently is no "separation of church and state"... as long as it is their religion and their state: Neither of these welcome traditional evangelical Christianity.
The first example of religion in globalism is the Aspen Institute, formerly called the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies. Aspen is chosen because it is established, influential, substantive and very representative. There are many other organizations that comprise a loose network of common interests, but it is not necessary or possible to discuss each one.
IOW... they are conjoined philosophical/ideological twins..
Paving the way for what? Atheism? Or Islamofascism? Never forget, come what may, Almight God is in control.
mark
What makes these "Humanist" movements dangerous is not their disbelief in "supernatural intervention". It's their belief that with enough intellect, money and power man can defy not only the Judeo-Christian God but can defy even the basic laws of nature. E.g., they believe that central planning can substitute for market systems, human nature can be changed by decree, the Law of Unintended Consequences does not exist, etc.
bump
Good read, THX.
You may find this of interest:
“Socialism, Free Enterprise, and the Common Good”
By Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty
at http://www.hillsdale.edu/imprimis/
Later read/possible pingout.