Posted on 05/31/2007 8:50:00 PM PDT by monomaniac
Madison, WI (LifeNews.com) -- The Wisconsin company that holds the patent on most embryonic stem cells is challenging the federal government's rejection of its patent. The Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation holds the patents on researcher James Thompson's work and has called it a "landmark invention."
Thompson is considered the first to isolate human embryonic stem cells in 1998, a controversial work because human embryos must be destroyed to obtain them.
WARF currently holds three patents that it says essentially give it rights over all of the human embryonic stem cells in the U.S.
The U.S Patent and Trademark Office issued a preliminary decision in April and said it was considering throwing out the patents. It called them an obvious work based on previous research by other scientists.
The foundation filed a formal challenge to the decision on Thursday and argues the patent office relied on irrelevant previous patents and publications in making its decision.
"Clearly, at the time of the discoveries leading scientists and scholars from around the world saw Thomson as the first scientist to isolate and proliferate human embryonic stem cells," said WARF's managing director, Carl Gulbrandsen, said.
He said he was confident the patents would be upheld.
The patents have been controversial because WARF charged hundreds of thousands of dollars to scientists and research universities to use the stem cells covered under its patents. Some scientists said those fees, not President Bush's limits on taxpayer funding of the science, put limits on it.
WARF eventually announced in January that it will waive some of its fees to fuel more embryonic stem cell research.
Under the new policies, some scientists using the patented embryonic stem cells will now be allowed to share them with other researchers at no cost. Also, companies wanting to sponsor the destructive research at universities won't have to pay as much as $400,000 for licenses.
Jeanne Loring, who directs human embryonic stem cell research at the Burnham Institute for Medical Research in California, told the Contra Costa Times newspaper that the patent dispute is driving some scientists overseas.
"The patents are impeding our research," Loring said. "They're more important than what's going on in the Senate right now.
"It is making scientists go overseas to do this sort of research," she added. "It isn't the funding that's sending us overseas. It's the patent issues."
Loring said scientists can easily obtain licenses to work with the embryonic stem cells but the problems would come into play if they ever produced therapies, which none have so far.
Pro-life advocates oppose embryonic stem cell research because the cells can only be obtained by destroying human embryos. They point to the use of adult stem cells as a better alternative because they have already helped patients with at least 70 different diseases and conditions.
.
From my e-mail from AFA:
“This week—probably on Thursday, June 7— the U.S. House of
Representatives will vote on a bill (S. 5) to fund research
that requires the killing of human embryos. The Senate
passed this bill in May and now the House will vote on it.
Sponsored by Senators Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Tom Harkin
(D-Iowa), S. 5 will send your tax dollars to research on
human embryos that supposedly are “leftover” from in vitro
fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these
human embryos, this bill would require their death.
As you may know, President Bush has decided that such
research involve cells taken from human embryos could be
funded so long as the cells were obtained on or prior to
August 9, 2001. Since then, the government has funded
research on over 22 stem cell lines. Fortunately, the
President’s policy erected a wall and does not encourage
the further killing of human embryos for these cells.
The Reid-Harkin bill will tear down this wall permanently!
Just as abortion is currently legal, sadly, killing human
embryos is completely legal. As a result, this week’s
debate is really about federal funding. We don’t federally
fund abortion even though it is legal. Likewise, liberals
should not force U.S. taxpayers to fund research that
requires the killing of embryos. Last July, President Bush
vetoed a similar bill and the House upheld the veto. This
year, the battle has become more intense. The House passed
a similar bill (H.R. 3) in January. The Senate then passed
a slightly different version in April, which the House will
now vote on and send it to the President. We expect the
President to veto S. 5. The House does not have the votes
to overturn a veto, but we must make sure no Members who
opposed H.R. 3 in January switch their votes to support S.
5.
Please contact your Representatives and let them know that
you strongly oppose S. 5. Click here to send them an email
opposing S. 5. Or call right away at 202-224-3121 and ask
for your senators’ offices.”
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.