Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stockpirate

No, Clinton was. Carter second worst.


29 posted on 06/02/2007 10:25:49 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Cedric

What is worse being cheated by someone that you know is a cheat and a crook or by someone who you thought was an honest person and shared some of your same core beliefs, but ended up cheating you and lying to you?


30 posted on 06/02/2007 10:29:32 AM PDT by stockpirate (IF BUSH SIGNS THIS POS IMMIGRATION BILL, I WILL NOT VOTE REPUBLICAN AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Cedric

I have to go with carter on that one. He was the instigator for the islamofascist to grow and spread to the point they are today. clinton gave them an additional nudge.


31 posted on 06/02/2007 10:33:10 AM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Cedric
"No, Clinton was. Carter second worst."

Carter has done some serious damage and continues to try to cause this country even more, but after the time that has passed, we can, at least, judge the amount and kind he's responsible for. Clinton, we can't even guess how much damage and what kind, since the time interval is too short. If this open borders-illegal amnesty move of Bush's becomes law, he may singlehandedly finish us off before we even know how damaging Clinton was.

49 posted on 06/02/2007 10:57:28 AM PDT by penowa (NO more Bushes; NO more Clintons EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Cedric

“No, Clinton was. Carter second worst.”

Carter was worse than Clinton. Bush may be too before all is said and done. There is no question that he is far and away the worst republican president of alltime. He may be bottom five in our history.


71 posted on 06/02/2007 11:41:11 AM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Cedric

“No, Clinton was. Carter second worst.”

Right now I would prefer Millard Fillmore...the “do nothing President.” At least it would buy us some time.


81 posted on 06/02/2007 12:16:09 PM PDT by Bogtrotter52 (Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Cedric
>>No, Clinton was. Carter second worst.<<

Please don't misunderstand the following. I always hated Clinton, but I don't think he was ever foolish enough to attack his own base.

Now I think Bush has a dilemma:

1) If he keeps attacking us, it just energizes the anti-amnesty effort. In fact I think anything he says about it now helps us anti-amnesty folks.

2) If he shuts up, he can be accused of abandoning support for amnesty.


100 posted on 06/02/2007 9:19:12 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Illegals: representation without taxation--Citizens: taxation without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Cedric

No, Clinton was. Carter second worst.

Wrong! Carter was the worst President in the History of the United States!!! Although no need to get in an arguement over it because both are not worth it. lol.


106 posted on 06/03/2007 3:15:25 AM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Cedric

It’s getting difficult to pick the worst POTUS. There are so many POS POTUS. What king george is doing now is the worst thing for the country I’ve had the misfortune to witness.


107 posted on 06/03/2007 5:50:01 AM PDT by ca centered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson