Skip to comments.
AL-QAEDA LEADER KILLED IN BAGHDAD
MULTI-NATIONAL FORCE-IRAQ ^
| 6/6/07
| Unknown
Posted on 06/06/2007 8:44:20 AM PDT by SoldierDad
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-142 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator
To: SoldierDad
PING To the Troops. Muhammed had better order up more virgins. Intel says they’re running low...
62
posted on
06/06/2007 9:29:49 AM PDT
by
OSTATE
(bad cop)
To: SoldierDad
63
posted on
06/06/2007 9:31:01 AM PDT
by
rbosque
(MSM = Miserable Socialist Morons.)
To: SoldierDad
64
posted on
06/06/2007 9:33:09 AM PDT
by
beachn4fun
(How long will the world allow terrorism to be the answer to the problem?)
To: SoldierDad
Harry Reid, Turbin Durbin, and of course General Pelosi are all saddened to hear of this....
65
posted on
06/06/2007 9:38:23 AM PDT
by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: Red Badger
Why don’t they use “Son of”, el- or al-?........ Dunno. They didn't ask my help in establishing the language. ;-)
"Al" pretty much means "the." They're all named "Al" around here.
66
posted on
06/06/2007 9:46:02 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(Socks.)
To: SoldierDad
Don’t tell the media that the insurgents have switched sides and now do joint patrols with our troops to hunt down the foreign Al Qaeda scum.
Rummy was right. This would have never happened with a larger “footprint”.
67
posted on
06/06/2007 9:50:16 AM PDT
by
Blue State Insurgent
(Get this through your thick skull: We will never abandon the Iraqis.)
To: Red Badger
As John Edwards would say, “I see two Baghdads.......”
I'm not saying that the Shiites and Sunnis in Baghdad will ever get along 100%, but I do think we are working towards a point where the civilian population is helping us a lot more, and to a point where the two sides can co-exist (assuming that Iran and Saudi Arabia don't meddle in things).
If we get a lot more of these people tipping us off about the bad guys, then that means that not only can we work towards retaking all of Baghdad (and we have to retake the whole thing - we can't let parts of remain under radical control, period, end of story), it also means that the civilian population is feeling more secure (secure enough to help us - if these people are caught helping us by Al-Qaeda, they and their families are dead).
To: Badeye
69
posted on
06/06/2007 9:53:36 AM PDT
by
SoldierDad
(Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
To: Blue State Insurgent
Rummy was right. This would have never happened with a larger “footprint”.
While he was right about that, and I agree - we should have had a lot more force going into Iraq in 2003, he also has to accept some blame (most should be put on Bush) for not ramping up the military after 9/11, when it was clear the "war on terror" was pretty open-ended and could take place all over the world.
To: SoldierDad
Got another one! Whoo-Hoo!!
71
posted on
06/06/2007 9:57:30 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(I'm Fred, White and Blue!)
To: SoldierDad
To: SoldierDad
Good. Hope they get more and more and more.
To: SoldierDad
To: SoldierDad; SandRat; Jet Jaguar; All
75
posted on
06/06/2007 10:14:49 AM PDT
by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: CougarGA7
Careers 4 and 6 appear to be awfully similar.
76
posted on
06/06/2007 10:25:33 AM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: SJSAMPLE
Lol. Pretty much. Different benefit packages though.
77
posted on
06/06/2007 10:29:34 AM PDT
by
CougarGA7
(I really don't know what I want to put here.)
To: Deo et Patria
Deo et Patria wrote:
Another thread hijack in progress? There are plenty of threads on FR to discuss your thoughts on illegal immigration. This is not one of them.
I believe my remarks were to Joe and not you.
No one is hijacking any thread you politically correct nitpicker.
If you don’t like my remarks about jihadists having some of the same mentality as many of our politicians then defend the terrorists, RINO’s and Liberal left to your hearts content.
78
posted on
06/06/2007 10:32:32 AM PDT
by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, DUNCAN or THOMPSON 08, ELECTION 2008, MOST IMPORTANT OF MY LIFE TIME)
To: mmyers
Should STOP detaining terrorist, shoot them on sight. My first thought too. However, wouldn't it be prudent to put panties on their heads in order to gain some intel/info? You know, torture, according to the NY Slimes.
79
posted on
06/06/2007 10:38:35 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
To: af_vet_rr
We’re definitely now winning this... more and more locals are throwing in their lot with the Iraqi government and against the fool terrorists.
Great Job, President Bush!
80
posted on
06/06/2007 10:40:25 AM PDT
by
AFPhys
((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
