Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The subheadline said it will come back in the fall.
1 posted on 06/10/2007 10:19:19 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 3AngelaD
How Eisenhower solved illegal border crossings from Mexico

I Like Ike.

The immigration giveaway

Take the Pledge: "I pledge to never, ever vote for anyone, for any office, who votes in favor of the Mexican Invasion Surrender Bill."

2 posted on 06/10/2007 10:22:24 AM PDT by sourcery (Double Feature: "The Amnestyville Horror" and "Kill the Bill, Vol. 2")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

Pres. Bush has stated this weekend he wants it back ASAP!


3 posted on 06/10/2007 10:22:34 AM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

I like the letter posted in reply better than the article.


6 posted on 06/10/2007 10:30:12 AM PDT by Daralundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD
"Who slew immigration bill?"

Why should we care WHO shot this very bad bill down?

Sometimes, even for the wrong reason, our national legislature still ends up doing the right thing.

7 posted on 06/10/2007 10:30:30 AM PDT by alloysteel (Choose carefully the hill you would die upon. For if you win, the view is magnificent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

You can always rely on the DP to push the liberal line and this article’s got it all — opponents of this bill are “haters,” “extremists,” and even “racists” — at least, accordingly to Feinstein and Lamm. Predictably, the Post avoided equally vituperant quotes from the anti-”reform” side. No comment mentioned from Tancredo or Hunter. God forbid we should uphold our existing immigration and labor law and maintain the integrity of our national border. Sounds like Bush is not going to take this defeat sitting down, though — he’ll keep trying to complete America’s slide into a lawless, third-world hell-hole. I just can’t believe I voted for this back-stabber twice.


16 posted on 06/10/2007 10:42:34 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

“Both *extremes* have their hand on the dagger that killed it.”

Yeah, it’s “extreme” to not want the sovereignty of one’s Country destroyed — in order to benefit the global elite.


23 posted on 06/10/2007 10:49:29 AM PDT by STE=Q ("Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock." (Will Rogers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

It was dead from its own inertia and will only be revived when the immigrants here illegally are sent home first and then allowed in in an orderly fashion as the need permits.


28 posted on 06/10/2007 10:52:07 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

Two simple competing views brought this bill down. First was the support of business groups for the amnesty and guest worker portions of the bill, which would provide them with a continual supply of cheap labor to improve their bottom lines. Second was the goal of union groups in opposing the guest worker portion of the bill which they felt would put downward pressure on wages. Also, under the radar, many union groups and individual members, particularly in the private sector, were opposed to the instant amnesty provisions, for very much the same reasons.

It all came down to the major competing interests of each party, business vs. labor. It should be noted that if the guest worker portions of the bill were eliminated this bill may eventually pass. However, the Pubbies are not likely to let that happen as it would hurt them politically in future elections. Thus, the Pubs. will insist on both tougher enforcement measures and some version of the guest worker program to keep derailing the bill thru the next election and beyond. In the meantime the influx of illegals continues and very little gets done about the overall problem. Again, the politicos in the Senate are only interested in their own personal grandisement and electability the next time around, much to the detriment of their own constituents.

The only good to come out of this fiasco is that the netroots, on both left and right, are getting smarter at disecting these Congressional bills and insist on putting all of them in the light of day for everyone to see, rather than obscuring them in the dark in supposedly complicated parliamentary procedures and back room dealing with special interest groups.


29 posted on 06/10/2007 10:58:02 AM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD
I killed it! And I'm glad I did! :)

Of course, I had the help of many millions of conservatives.

53 posted on 06/10/2007 11:48:07 AM PDT by LibKill ("RUDY GIULIANI" is just "HILLARY CLINTON" misspelled and wearing a dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD
This analysis of why this "compromise" bill was defeated, is much closer to the truth than the one printed today in the New York Times. The people at the Times laid the defeat solely at the doorstep of GEICO-type political cavemen on their phones and computers.

The Times offered no explanation why such a backward and small group (per other coverage in that liberal bird cage liner) were able to pull off that feat. But even the Denver analysis doesn't quite tell the truth, that an overwhelming majority of the American people got up on their hind legs and told the US Senate where to head in.

That's the simple truth, which the lamestream media can't quite comprehend, much less report and print.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, "Feudin' Banjos 'n Writin' Laws"

56 posted on 06/10/2007 11:59:25 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Please visit www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD
Close to the election, sure they will. They don't listen even after we flexed our muscles. If they bring it back, we will be back.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

63 posted on 06/10/2007 12:29:41 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

I love the way 75% of the American people are being called extremists because we didn’t want this immigration bill. Hey, Senators, buy a clue! Seventy-five percent of the electorate is commonly referred to as an “overwhelming majority,” not a “group of extremists.”


66 posted on 06/10/2007 2:03:41 PM PDT by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

The EXTREMISTS (70% of the American people) KILLED THE BILL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


68 posted on 06/10/2007 3:23:14 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (Duncan Hunter and John Bolton in '08!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

Just say NO to Amnesty!! Keep calling!! It’s NOT OVER!!

U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121

U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121

White House comments: (202) 456-1111

Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep

Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm


72 posted on 06/10/2007 6:57:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson