[Old Student]

“OK, but from a political perspective if not from personal trust, I would sure vote for Romney, or all but Giuliani vs. the Democrats.”

That’s two of us, anyway. IMHO, Farah’s dead right about Giuliani. Romney too, but he might just possibly pass the sniff test, if I hold my nose. I’m thinking I’d probably vote for the Devil himself vs. Hillary.

[Mr. Lucky]

Out of professional courtesy, the Devil himself would never run against Hillary.

[unspun]

That’s two of us, anyway. IMHO, Farah’s dead right about Giuliani. Romney too, but he might just possibly pass the sniff test, if I hold my nose. I’m thinking I’d probably vote for the Devil himself vs. Hillary.

When a candidate reverses his stance on a position, as Romney has on abortion, etc., that's good. That's what we want. It's bizzare how many fail to understand -- we want to change minds, now don't we?

When a candidate is adamant on his perverse positions, however, and when they're of such magnitude, it hurts the cause to vote for him because of the (hypocritical) "R" beside his name.

Go Romney!

I don't anticipate voting for Giuliani, ever (and don't anticipate that Hobson's choice, anyway).