On Fox News Sunday, White House spokesman Tony Snow said, Our sense is that if Majority Leader Harry Reid brings it back up, which he should, and permits a full debate, were not only going to get a bill, but were going to get a better bill.
Really? Knowing that border security and enforcement is the main concern of the public, lets recap just a few of the amendments that were defeated in two weeks of debate: the Coleman amendment to end the policy of sanctuary cities, defeated 48-to-49; the McConnell amendment to require a photo ID for voting in order to combat voter fraud, defeated 41-to-52; the Cornyn amendment to deny amnesty to gang members and illegal aliens with criminal records, defeated 46-to-51; the Vitter amendment to guarantee a secure, biometric check in/check out visa system be in place prior to any guest worker program going into effect, defeated 48-to-49; and the Coburn-DeMint amendment to guarantee full border security prior to amnesty, defeated 42-to-54.
Maybe President Bush is going to go to Capitol Hill tomorrow and urge senators to reconsider their votes on these important border security amendments. That would be a debate worth having. I suspect Harry Reid decided to cut off the debate last week because all these votes against commonsense border security issues was getting a little embarrassing. As Rasmussen Reports noted, border security could rally the overwhelming majority of Americans and unite the conservative base against Ted Kennedy and the pro-amnesty liberals in the Senate. But without these amendments, its hard to imagine how we will get a better bill, and the insistence of Washingtons political elites on forcing something through that the public clearly does not want will only infuriate the grass roots even more.
rebelfags.blogspot
Very well said.