Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House passes gun-control bill in response to Va. Tech
AP via Yahoo! ^ | 06-13-07 | Jim Abrams

Posted on 06/13/2007 9:04:10 AM PDT by Teacher317

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: GeorgiaDawg32

he was judged to be a danger to him self and others.thats more then just seeing a shrink


21 posted on 06/13/2007 2:48:36 PM PDT by Charlespg (Peace= When we trod the ruins of Mecca and Medina under our infidel boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317; Joe Brower; Travis McGee; El Gato; Squantos; King Prout; PoorMuttly; Eaker; All
I thought the VaTech shooter was a valid firearms purchaser, even with the ordered outpatient treatment. Is that not correct?

No. Virginia courts ruled Cho 'an imminent danger'

That usually means the person is considered a threat to himself or others. IIRC in NY State, if 2 docs attest to that, that means involuntary commitment to a psych facility until you are not considered a threat any more. It would cause a disability on a NICS check in states that don't have privacy protections. A story in the NY Times said they found psych meds in his room. Other stories said he didn't follow up with outpatient treatment.

And will that soon be expanded to those who go for voluntary treatment?

That's what I fear. With the computerization of writing prescriptions for psychiatric meds, and their use for various diagnoses besides major depression with suicidal ideation, bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, there's a potential possibility that could cause a disability on a NICS check. You know the grabbers would like to include all sorts of diagnoses if they could. I'd like to see the text of the bill.

22 posted on 06/13/2007 2:52:48 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlespg

agreed, but he wasn’t COMMITTED..that’s the difference..he was sent on an outpatient basis..


23 posted on 06/13/2007 2:58:07 PM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (Every Democrat Party cause eventually becomes a business then it degenerates into a racket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

That’s coming like day following night, if the rats win in 2008.


24 posted on 06/13/2007 3:19:05 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ladysmith

mentally ill will be anyone that wants to own a handgun


25 posted on 06/13/2007 3:40:30 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ladysmith

mentally ill will be anyone that wants to own a handgun


26 posted on 06/13/2007 3:40:36 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Sure, carefully scrutinize legitimate citizens exercising their enumerated Constitutional rights. Meanwhile no one checks anything re: some 12 million illegals (plus or minus a million). In fact many police organizations are prohibited from inquiring about their legal status.

Common Sense has tumbled over and severely gashed his head.

27 posted on 06/13/2007 4:34:41 PM PDT by kcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

I just wrote the NRA and told them they wouldn’t receive my pledge because of their support for this bill.


28 posted on 06/13/2007 4:38:55 PM PDT by Nachoman (I can't help the way I think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
McCarthy was interviewed after this was passed. She was salivating at the prospect that MILLIONS of names would be added to the database of ineligible buyers.
29 posted on 06/13/2007 4:46:11 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: niki

This is why Ron Paul has my vote.


30 posted on 06/13/2007 6:03:36 PM PDT by BigTom85 (Proud Gun Owner and Member of NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

The proper (constitutional) way to keep guns out of the hands of kooks is: to let them have them, and then shoot them out of their hands. Works every time.


31 posted on 06/13/2007 8:29:21 PM PDT by budwiesest (Why do politicians and bureaucrats hate freedom?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackie
The NRA (I’m a life member) is getting just like GWB and capitulating to the dark side

The NRA has been finding ways to work with anti-gunners since 1968

32 posted on 06/13/2007 9:09:01 PM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
And will that soon be expanded to those who go for voluntary treatment?

Of course it will. The left will stop at nothing to disarm the public. Socialists love an unarmed subject.

33 posted on 06/17/2007 6:04:28 AM PDT by meyer (RNC, DNC, two sides of the same coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
I thought the VaTech shooter was a valid firearms purchaser, even with the ordered outpatient treatment.

That's how I understand it.

IIRC, the problem was that he he was not/could not be involuntarily commited or adjudicated mentally incompetent (thanks ACLU.)

And of course, that Virginia Tech was a "gun free" zone.

Wonder why our legislators don't want to solve the real problems?

34 posted on 06/17/2007 6:09:36 AM PDT by Tribune7 (A bleeding heart does nothing but ruin the carpet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
This is all horsehockey anyway. The one thing that would have prevented the VA Tech massacre from escalating above a single shooting or two would have been an armed student or two.

You don't see these types of massacres in areas where the general population is likely to be armed - only in liberal-controlled areas where people have had their right to keep and bear arms removed by law.

35 posted on 06/17/2007 6:11:07 AM PDT by meyer (RNC, DNC, two sides of the same coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Many professors and doctors say that being a Christian, or a right winger is a mental disorder; one day they could use such law to deny us the right to purchase weapons, by categorizing us as insane. Hillary would surely do it.
36 posted on 06/17/2007 6:24:42 AM PDT by gedeon3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Wonder why our legislators don't want to solve the real problems?

They never have -- don't think they will start now?

37 posted on 12/20/2007 1:44:10 PM PST by Turret Gunner A20 (Tolerating intolerance is not a "value," it's self-destructive stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: beltfed308

I wish Nurse McCarthy (who represents my childhood district, once held by the great Norman Lent), would go back to emptying bedpans. She is a one-note congresscritter who just votes straight left on the other issues she’s too busy to think about.


38 posted on 12/20/2007 1:45:58 PM PST by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson