Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taping was legal, defense attorneys in wiretap case say[Taped Police-7yrs Jail]{Pennsylvania}
The Patriot News ^ | 14 June 2007 | Matt Miller

Posted on 06/14/2007 8:40:57 AM PDT by BGHater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Paisan
"Maybe someone else remembers this."

I do. The civilian was found guilty of Illegal Wiretapping and was sent to prison. This was in 1999.

21 posted on 06/14/2007 10:03:07 AM PDT by Deguello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel
, anyone have an explanation as to why someone who did this is so dangerous or so wrong that they should go to prison?

For daring to record what police were doing. After all if video evidence of interactions with police was common, the police couold no longer routinely lie to get convictions and will have to stick to the truth - a major blow to law enforcement and government in general.

22 posted on 06/14/2007 10:08:48 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

Nah it was the cop who initiated this. You can have all the stupid laws on the books, but it takes a moron with a gun and a badge to enforce them. That’s were the rubber meets the road. Despotic cops=despotic state.


23 posted on 06/14/2007 10:47:37 AM PDT by rednesss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

I understand what you are saying, but the law(s) was/were not originally created to stop people from recording LEOs. Most cases prosecuted don’t even involve any government actor. I’m just trying to understand the mindset of those in State legislatures who decided recording someone without their knowledge and consent rises to the level of a criminal tort which must be punished with(or up to) a lengthy prison sentence. It just doesn’t make any sense to me. Seems like a clear civil case or tort to me.


24 posted on 06/14/2007 10:54:05 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

People working for governments do not normally have a reasonable expectation of privacy while doing that work. They work for the public, thus what they do is open to scrutiny. Possible exceptions are attorney/client priveledge and closed door meetings, restrooms etc. Whoever started this crap was an idiot. The government works for the people not the other way around. Sometimes they need to be reminded of that simple fact.


25 posted on 06/14/2007 11:04:03 AM PDT by rolling_stone (same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel
It just doesn’t make any sense to me

Most laws don't make any sense to me. In fact government is making less sense all the time.

26 posted on 06/14/2007 11:17:46 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
The government works for the people not the other way around

This is obviously NOT the view of the government and it bureaucrats - armed and otherwise.

27 posted on 06/14/2007 11:24:52 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

That’s one really really dumb cop. He is going to lose, bigtime.


28 posted on 06/14/2007 11:27:50 AM PDT by Palladin (NO Shamnesty!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Time to change the law. The traffic system is already more one-sided than the criminal system, with the government having a conflict of interest - the government sets the speed limits, sets the fines, and is allowed to profit from the fines from which police officers and the judges are paid and squad cars are purchased! The least that should be done is to pass a law that clearly allows citizens to tape the police during their official duties.


29 posted on 06/15/2007 11:08:02 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
"What if you have a camera hidden in your home, and catch someone breaking into your house and stealing something. Can you be charged under this law?"

Yes, but only if your tape contains AUDIO as well as video.

30 posted on 06/15/2007 11:28:59 AM PDT by Hoof Hearted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jan in Colorado

ping


31 posted on 06/15/2007 8:40:37 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson