Skip to comments.
Spokesman for President Bush Posts on Free Republic About Immigration Bill
Thursday, June 14, 2007
| Kristinn
Posted on 06/14/2007 11:16:52 AM PDT by kristinn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,660, 1,661-1,680, 1,681-1,700 ... 1,741-1,759 next last
To: sageb1
In that first picture, it looks like the internationalists are worshipping Tribbles! In the second picture, Vicente Fox is clearly calling the shots, and the Canadian is welcoming Jorge Arbusto into the club as their idiot bag man, with limitless funds stolen from the productive at gunpoint to shower upon illiterate parasite invaders.
If it wasn’t for the Welfare State, this issue wouldn’t be such a big deal, but in the current scheme of American “governance”, every thinking person clearly realizes that if this Benedict Arnold Bill reaches Bush’s desk, he’ll happily consign all legal Americans to 2nd class citizenship.
To: tomnbeverly
tomnbeverly sez: More red meat for the base... You know Conservatives asking Bush to pass a Conservative filled (Border Wall) (Enforce the existing law) standard bill as part of immigration reform with a Democrat controlled Congress, is like the liberals asking Bill Clinton, while mired in the Monica scandal, to attempt and have Congress pass a law that says a women has the right to murder her unborn child up until the day of birth and then getting upset with him when he doesnt do it. The base in its attempt to hold Bush accountable allows nothing to get done about immigration in the present and if the GOP loses the WH in 08.. Well lets just say you can pretty much bet the Dem bill to FIX the Illegal problem is going to make the current one look like it is sponsored by Tom Tancredo. This is a naked and pathetic attempt at the fake "silent amnesty" non-argument advanced by the Benedict Arnold wing of what's left of the GOP. Yeah, we must accept this Bill, or else! Or else what? Geeze. WTF is up w/ some people?
To: Chuck Dent
Chuck Dent sez: I think many, many people are beginning to realize this. It is no longer merely about differences in opinion regarding policy issues. Coulter touched on it briefly in a recent column when she alluded to Kennedy's outright disdain & hatred of America. They want to destroy everything this county stands for and believes in. When it dawns on you that our most dangerous enemies aren't practicing Islam, but are actually our elected leaders, what do you do after you mutter "Uh oh"? You're kind of right, but I do believe our most dangerous contemporary enemies, at least the activist/military wing, are committed jihadis. Then you have your idiot sympathizers, as seen @ DU et al. Everything they believe in (publicly funded gay weddings) is directly threatened by Islam, yet the idiots still side with NazIslam, because it's not fascism if non-christian people do it. Then you have the sudden emergence of this incomprehensible and nihilistic faction in the GOP that will stab citizens and taxpayers in the back, virtually stealing the long knife, from the Democrat party. As another poster said in this thread, he or she can take a lot of pain and betrayal, but simply wants an answer to "why?" Someone famous once said something like 'never ascribe to evil that which can be attributed to mere stupidity'. That's a false choice though, history is full of examples where evil, greed, and stupidity happily made common cause.
To: kristinn
[Operation Rollback, assessed $15,000,000 in civil fines to employers, an amount greater than the sum of administrative fines collected in the previous eight years ]
Dear Nicholas Thompson, Can you not see the irony in that statement??? What the Hell were you guys doing for those eight years? If you’d been enforcing the law during that time, we wouldn’t be in this mess.
I drive through all parts of Las Vegas as part of my business, and I can tell you vast areas of this city are permanently lost - a vast Mexican Barrio filled with llanterias. Jorge Bush would no doubt call me racist, but I speak fluent Spanish and even helped start an Hispanic media concern hear so that doesn’t wash. Even a close Hispanic friend of asks me, why must they be the one who learns Spanish?
Sorry, but this bill needs to die from a thousand slashes of outraged people.
To: mountaineer1997
I would like to agree 100% with:
1) BUILD THE FENCE
2) DEPORT ALL ILLEGALS
3) FINE / PROSECUTE EMPLOYERS BREAKING THE LAW
4) INCREASE BORDER PATROL
5) CONTINUE LEGAL IMMIGRATION
6) DENY ALL FEDERAL FUNDING TO SO-CALLED SANCTUARY CITIES/STATES.
This is the job we expect you to do. Thank you.
To: doug from upland
Until the President has proven he has taken his oath of office seriously in this matter, go pound sand. We disposed of Clinton and get a war, a illegal alien invasion, 4th amendment almost expunged, and the supreme court has destroyed personnel property right with expanded eminent domain laws for private business.
This has been a disastrous 6 years for the constitution and a great 6 years for the Mexican - American oligarchy.
Oops, put away those Mexican flags.
We love America, but not Americans.
I'm living in an freak in American political nightmare.
1,666
posted on
06/17/2007 1:07:57 AM PDT
by
Major_Risktaker
(Global Warming is a cover story for Peak Oil.)
To: PhiKapMom
PhiKapMom sezNot just the fence after the fence is built use all the technology available to make a virtual fence so that INS can view the whole length and get agents to areas where they have broken through the fence. We need two fences one to the north and one to the south. I'm sure you know as well as I that the Leftist RepubliCrat/DemLican traitors that pull the strings of the IRS will never allow a fence to be built. Shame and calumny upon the less-than-worthless Jorge Benedict Arnold Arbusto presidency. As a final check, as if I need to, I'm sure Jimmy Carter is 110% behind it. He'll no longer be America's most reviled ex-president who stabbed the USA every chance he got, that will go to Whore-Hey, aka Jorge Benedict Arnold Bush, slurping burrito in the shadows.
To: varon
I would like to point out that the Secretary is authorized to reduce or mitigate penalties. As a reminder of whats in the bill, fines for hiring an illegal worker are $5,000 maximum per illegal worker for the first offense,
.. (my emphasis) varon sez: Why should the Secretary be able to reduce or mitigate the amount of fines? Why is the amount listed as maximum if it isnt intended to be misleading as in, up to? These fines are meaningless because the employers have saved many times that amount in not having to pay their share of FICA and are probably writing them off as business expenses. This whole thing is a mockery and an insult to the intelligence of the American people!!! So right on. The Left, who have no allegiance to party or nation, are moving to bring down what they perceive to be the greatest threat to collectivism, the citizens and taxpayers of the United States. The MSM once portrayed El Presidente Jorge Benedict Arnold Bush as a conservative, and whined every day about him, but what has Jorge done that's actually conservative? He's been tugging at Ted Kennedy's zipper ever since he was put in office. The Left is much smarter and more insidious than they are given credit for. They were able to elevate a brain dead stab-America-in-the-back traitor to the presidency without having to expend the political capital of nominating their dream candidate, Ward Churchill. Ward Churchill only said Americans who died in 9-11 deserved it, but El Jefe Coyote Jorge wants to do everything possible to ensure it can be repeated against the common citizens and taxpayers he holds as beneath contempt. I wouldn't be surprised in the least to see chief coyote Jorge sign a bill forcing every state honor homos pretending to marry. What a disgusting disgrace the Jorge faction of the GOP has turned out to be.
To: Cedar
"Stop the New World (B)order!" Good one, Cedar.
But a little difficult to stop what you can't see, isn't it? ;>
To: Cedar
"Stop the New World (B)order!" Good one, Cedar.
But a little difficult to stop what you can't see, isn't it? ;>
To: Eastbound
People have been conditioned to not see it. That is why it most likely too late. People have been presented with facts, yet they still reject those facts, because they are more afraid of being cast as tin foil kooks. When we all do finally wake up, the battle will be over.
It’s amazing how we would rather act like we just cannot understand something that does not make sense. We keep asking why. Some of the rationalizations I have seen are more kooky than the reality. The reality fills in the empty spaces and we can follow the dots.
Seems the thought conditioning over a period of many years has been very successful. People still believe this could all be party politics and legacy building. If this bill passes, the elections will have very little value.
1,671
posted on
06/17/2007 4:00:38 AM PDT
by
dforest
(Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
To: BloodScarletMinnesota
Horribly plausible.
Not sure what viable patriotic alternatives exist.
1,672
posted on
06/17/2007 4:01:17 AM PDT
by
Quix
(GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
To: BloodScarletMinnesota
Well worth stating again:
You're kind of right, but I do believe our most dangerous contemporary enemies, at least the activist/military wing, are committed jihadis. Then you have your idiot sympathizers, as seen @ DU et al. Everything they believe in (publicly funded gay weddings) is directly threatened by Islam, yet the idiots still side with NazIslam, because it's not fascism if non-christian people do it.
Then you have the sudden emergence of this incomprehensible and nihilistic faction in the GOP that will stab citizens and taxpayers in the back, virtually stealing the long knife, from the Democrat party. As another poster said in this thread, he or she can take a lot of pain and betrayal, but simply wants an answer to "why?" Someone famous once said something like 'never ascribe to evil that which can be attributed to mere stupidity'. That's a false choice though, history is full of examples where evil, greed, and stupidity happily made common cause.
Thanks tons.
1,673
posted on
06/17/2007 4:04:21 AM PDT
by
Quix
(GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
To: F15Eagle
Couldn't have said it better, or more clearly and concisely.
Can I say (and fellow FReepers chime in please - as if you wouldnt, LOL)
1) BUILD THE FENCE
2) DEPORT ALL ILLEGALS
3) FINE / PROSECUTE EMPLOYERS BREAKING THE LAW
4) INCREASE BORDER PATROL
5) CONTINUE LEGAL IMMIGRATION
This is the job we expect you to do. Thank you.
Governing isn't that hard, W. Follow your "Republican" principles and uphold the US Constitution and the laws of the nation. If W really wants to know what is going on, he can try actually engaging the average citizen. He can find many of them on FR. Or, W can stay in DC, surrounded by a treasonous elite in Congress and the assorted alphabet agencies and departments of the Federal government.
Either way, W and his self important minions must realize that the "immigration bill" they slavishly support is a crock, is unacceptable, is bad policy and it will get Republicans nowhere come the November elections.
1,674
posted on
06/17/2007 4:29:04 AM PDT
by
Thumper1960
(Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
To: BloodScarletMinnesota
"Yeah, we must accept this Bill, or else! Or else what? Geeze." Mama Mia, is Mackey back in town? Oh, wait! I though he was talking about the new Amero. Same difference, though.
;>
To: Thumper1960
What you and Eagle15 said.
Nick and the WH still don’t get it.
These people are trying to assuage us by saying they’ll go easy (or easier) on employers who unknowingly break the law?
No one would hire you or me without proof we’re legal? It’s not that hard to show, and if the gvmnt’s docs are easy to fake, fix that in a separate bill, you “comprehensive” buffoons.
And yeah, another big selling point is the part about: first offense pays $5000, second pays ... .... fourth pays $75,000.
Does the bill says what they pay at the 243rd frigging offense?
1,676
posted on
06/17/2007 4:44:54 AM PDT
by
beckaz
(Dump Gonzales Yesterday, and Chertoff too.)
To: beckaz
You really want to know what happens at the 243rd offense?
Nothing.
Nothing, except another fine. A fine that will be just another cost of doing business. Another cost of doing business that will be passed on to the consumer as higher business costs. Will any officer of a company ever see jail time? Hardly. Plenty of lawyers make good money by keeping dirty little white collar criminals out of the pokey.
One way or the other the average legal citizen will take another shot in the rump.
Bush is well on his way to killing the Republican party. I do hope when his daddy and Bubba Clinton sit down at their politically incestuous chit-chats they'll be satisfied to know that W and Comrade Carter will share the notoriety of being co-holders of most pathetic president in US history.
1,677
posted on
06/17/2007 5:03:29 AM PDT
by
Thumper1960
(Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
To: indylindy
"Seems the thought conditioning over a period of many years has been very successful. People still believe this could all be party politics and legacy building. If this bill passes, the elections will have very little value." Right on all counts, indylindy. The fat lady is warming up in the wings but few realize the warm-up is not the cantada she'll be singing.
To: Thumper1960
Agreed.
I’d add that beyond the Rep. party, this bill would damage the whole country by FURTHER undermining the rule of law and setting the stage for the next wave of illegals.
And that this WH hack actually believes his drivel is a winning argument (on FR of all places) shows how SCARINGLY out of touch Bush and his people are.
1,679
posted on
06/17/2007 5:18:12 AM PDT
by
beckaz
(Dump Gonzales Yesterday, and Chertoff too.)
To: indylindy
Would you believe we still have a few on FR who are still bouncing off the walls here screaming, 'Kook! Kook! Kook?'
That, I believe can be attributed to cognitive dissonance -- holding two diametrically opposed opinions and stumbling around in the twilight zone of indecision, still trying to decide between the red pill or blue pill -- like moths flirting with the flame.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,660, 1,661-1,680, 1,681-1,700 ... 1,741-1,759 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson