Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706
I do not have medical insurance now, and haven't had for personal reasons, for about 20 years. That is my choice, and it seems to me that any law which seeks to "fine" a resident of any state for not making a personal spending decision in their budget, is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL law. I trust this Massachusetts "health insurance" nanny law will be tested in court with dispatch.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, "Bar Fight in the Blue Ridge: The Battle for NC 11"

13 posted on 06/15/2007 7:35:43 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Please visit www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob

The Court is run, lock-stock and barrel, by the
New York Times. It will not be tested.
It will be affirmed with more rights taken.
-— and of course, without vote.


15 posted on 06/15/2007 7:47:25 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
I'm curious Congressman, without health insurance, what would you do in the event of a catastrophic accident or illness?

Are you independently wealthy?

19 posted on 06/15/2007 8:09:08 PM PDT by suffering_fools
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson