Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode

Oh, one more thing.

The Theory of Evolution lives or dies by how well it explains what we find in the rocks and in our DNA. The success of the theory itself is not touched by those who mistakenly try to “apply” it to human society. And in its own terms (explaining rocks and DNA) it is probably the most successful theory in the history of science.

The Theory of Marxism, on the other hand, can only prove successful by creating a successful human society based on its precepts. It has never created such a society, not once. It is an abysmal failure everywhere it is tried and it’s current body-count is in the hundred-million range.

So on the one hand, you have history’s most successful Scientific theory and history’s most unsuccessful political theory. Of course the Marxist politico’s are going to try to wrap their naked failures in some semblance of evolutionary argument. But it’s only a semblance. It’s only a pseudo-scientific charade. Read Stephen J. Gould, one of the great writers on evolution, to see how unscientific the Marxist “applications” of evolution truly are.


4 posted on 06/16/2007 4:01:35 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman
And in its own terms (explaining rocks and DNA) it is probably the most successful theory in the history of science.

Oh please! I would not call a theory that has had to modified again and again and again, because it was wrong, "the most successful theory in the history of science.".

Just like it depended on JUNK-DNA being true and now we know that there is no such thing. BZZZT! Try again.

11 posted on 06/16/2007 5:57:20 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson