Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush administration again lies about border security: Debra Burlingame
9/11 Families for America ^ | June 16, 2006 | Tim Sumner

Posted on 06/16/2007 10:41:59 AM PDT by Sergeant Tim

Last night, Constitutional expert and talk-radio host Mark Levin spoke with Debra Burlingame about the now revived ‘Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007.’ The proponents of the bill in Congress and the administration are lying to the American people. That is not new news:

Debra Burlingame: “This amnesty bill is really a boom to the enemy. I guarantee you that al Qaeda has their guys lined up to get their amnesty, the ones already here and the ones who will come here. They will defraud this system to get their Social Security cards… How do we know that? There is a history for it. The 1993 World Trade Center bombing, there were more than 10 people associated with and convicted in that. Three of them got amnesty by claiming the were agricultural workers under a … special agricultural workers program that was part of the 1986 amnesty. Thank you very much, Ted Kennedy.

“The CIA shooter who murdered two people outside Langley [CIA HQs], he applied for amnesty in 1986 and was declined. He stayed anyhow because we had no way of knowing that he was still here. We didn’t have an entry and exit and entry system. So, Congress ordered one up in 1996 and … we haven’t got it still. In fact, last fall [Secretary of Homeland Security] Michael Chertoff said building one would be cost prohibitive, it would cost billions of dollars and would take more than ten years. One of the things they are saying about this bill is, it is going to have an entry and exit system. That’s a lie. These people will not go home and we will have no proof whether they did or not.”

Mark Levin: “They are still litigating in the courts whether or not it is Constitutional for our government to require people who leave the country to report that they are leaving the country.”

Debra Burlingame: “…Michelle Malkin has a phrase, “It is not over, legally, until the alien wins.” I went through this bill … I went directly to border security because that was what interested me most. Every single provision has this phrase before you get to the details, “Subject to the availability of funds.” ... That's what they do when they pass these bills, they hold back the funds.

"What documents are they going to accept to prove identity with these millions and millions of people? In 2002, this was five years ago and the problem has gotten worse, the GAO did a report and they found “rampant and pervasive document fraud.” There is a backlog of Green Card cases, this in 2002, they had a backlog then of four million cases, an increase of 50% over six years and the report said, “The staff is rewarded for timely handling of petitions,” rather than scrutiny on the merits. How is this going to happen now if suddenly they are inundated with 12 to 20 million applications…”

Mark Levin: “They can’t do it. It is absolutely impossible. They can’t do it and they won’t do it.”

Debra Burlingame: “And they know they can’t do it. They are lying to the American people.

"Meanwhile, I had someone very high up in this administration tell me when I asked him, point blank … this before I was able to read the whole thing because they snuck this in and wanted to get it passed in 48 hours without anyone reading it … will this bill have authority for state and local law enforcement to enforce these laws... “Absolutely,” said this member of the Bush administration. Three days later, when all those amendments were being poured out on to the floor of the Senate, out came an amendment giving state and local law enforcement the ability with probable cause to scrutinize the legal presence of a suspect if they have probable cause to believe a person is here illegally. That was roundly voted down. So this person was not only not telling me the truth, when someone tried to put it in there, it was voted out.

"This is undemocratic, what they are doing. And we know that people -- however they feel about how these people should be managed that are here -- 80% polled say give us border security first and they are not doing it."

Mark Levin: "Why won't they do it?"

Debra Burlingame: "I think a clue is when you look at President Bush, who announced his phoney gesture of good faith, four-point-four billion dollars for a fence ... they are going to build half of what they enacted last year, he was addressing a construction trade association, the biggest users of cheap labor. I think they want an endless supply". [Editor -- This transcript above is of the first half of the interview. The entire interview can be heard at the bolded link.]

Congress and the Bush administration have used “subject to the availability of funds” to not fully implement the border security provisions of every bill they have passed and signed into law since 9/11.

The 'Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act' authorized 10,000 new border agents, 40,000 additional detention beds, and 4,000 new immigration enforcement agents yet all three were funded well below 50% of authorization. In fact, the Bush administration attempted to provide a mere 210 new border agents for FY 2006 yet was eventually forced to fund 700 new agents for both FY 2006 and 2007.

Congress overwhelmingly passed the REAL ID Act and President Bush signed it into law on May 11, 2005. Its implementation was waived until the end of next year and the administration has yet to speak out against its proposed repeal. While Peter Gadiel says, “The CATO Institute and ACLU have successfully lobbied states to not implement the provisions of the ‘REAL ID Act’,” due to “privacy concern,” the federal government has provided them further cover by authorizing less than half the needed funding

Concerning the current immigration bill's entry and exit system proposal, “In December 2006, the Bush administration decided to shelve plans to develop a facial or fingerprint recognition system to track whether international visitors leave the country on time via one of the country's many land ports of entry, although such a system is being deployed at international-gateway airports.”

Many states have authorized Mexico’s matricula ID card to be used (to varying degrees) as official proof of a person’s identity, even though one can easily be obtained on a street corner. When issued by Mexican consulates, the breeder documents accepted are highly suspect. A Mexican official has said, “[T]hey rely on the expertise of the staff in the 47 consulates to visually authenticate the documents,” yet standards vary from consulate to consulate. In addition, there probably never will be a single database for these cards. Despite these inherent security weaknesses, they are often used as picture ID to board commercial aircraft and have been used to enter federal buildings. The Bush administration has conspiring with Mexico to further a “silent amnesty” policy by allowing matricula ID cards to be used in lieu of passport and visa requirements.

We must end their lies by demanding that they secure our borders first.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911families; aliens; amnesty; borders; bordersecurity; immigrantlist; immigration; noamnestyforillegals; vampirebill; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: jedward
Sorry it took so long, but it is Saturday, and have lots to do before I can enjoy myself on FR...I do like GWB just not at this minute...
81 posted on 06/16/2007 2:40:40 PM PDT by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Sadly, this duplicity is par for the course. It's been going on for years. For those who haven't read it yet, I urge you to read IMMIGRATION AND USURPATION: ELITES, POWER, AND THE PEOPLE'S WILL, by a pro-American Mexican named Fredo Arias-King. He worked with the Vincente Fox campaign in 1999. During meetings with U.S legislators he became privy to our congressmen's real attitude toward border control. A couple gems from the article:
Some legislators had also mentioned to us (oftentimes laughing) how they had "defanged" or "gutted" anti-immigration bills and measures, by neglecting to fund this program or tabling that provision, or deleting the other measure, etc. "Yes, we passed that law, but it can’t work because we also…" was a usual comment to assuage the Mexican delegations.

...One leading Republican senator over a period of months was advising us, through a mutual acquaintance, about which mechanisms to follow and which other legislators to lobby in order to ensure passage of the amnesty proposal. In the meantime, he would speak on television about the need to "militarize" the border. This senator was recently singled out by a taxpayer’s advocacy group as a leader in "pork"-related politics...
As Arias-King points out, these attitudes are widespread in BOTH parties. They will promise us the moon regarding enforcement, but they know they will never have to deliver on the promises.

The article can be read, HERE. It's long, but it's a must read. There was also an FR thread about it a couple weeks ago HERE. I'm suprised talk radio hasn't mentioned the article explicitly because it's written by a pro-American insider who knows the Machiavellism of our leaders first hand.

82 posted on 06/16/2007 3:08:24 PM PDT by ishmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1851423/posts


83 posted on 06/16/2007 3:10:45 PM PDT by jedward (Mission '08 - Take back the House & Senate. No Negotiations...No Prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Beth528

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1851423/posts


84 posted on 06/16/2007 3:11:52 PM PDT by jedward (Mission '08 - Take back the House & Senate. No Negotiations...No Prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx
"It seems time for a major revolt of some kind."

Time for a revolution...start by burning Washington, DC to the ground.

85 posted on 06/16/2007 3:15:38 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

This is not DU.


86 posted on 06/16/2007 4:58:30 PM PDT by CatQuilt (Let the people vote! (MA Marriage Amendment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

Thanks Sgt.Tim for the ping.
I heard Deborah on Mark’s show and appreciate the transcript.
She has been a trooper on the issues that count.


87 posted on 06/16/2007 5:00:52 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"Liars, all!"

In addition to being traitors, a far more serious charge.

88 posted on 06/16/2007 5:09:14 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
It will accomplish with the stroke of a pen what the Soviets, the Nazis, and the British Army could not.

Excellent point worth repeating.

89 posted on 06/16/2007 5:18:43 PM PDT by bigjoesaddle ("What we are making is a socialist utopia" - Jim Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

My friend, Debra, is a patriot.


90 posted on 06/16/2007 7:20:45 PM PDT by Sergeant Tim (In the War on Terror, there is no place to run from here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Beth528

That is very funny. Liked it lots. : )


91 posted on 06/16/2007 7:27:14 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Czar
In addition to being traitors, a far more serious charge.

bump!

92 posted on 06/16/2007 7:32:53 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

Yes I agree.
The terrorists on her brother’s plane lived 6 miles from me in San Diego. So nice they could skip around freely...not


93 posted on 06/16/2007 7:40:26 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim
They are all lying

"Public service" has become a joke, it is now self enrichment not service.

We have the best government corporate America and lobbyists can buy

Does anyone still believe Bush is a Christian? One more convenient lie to lure the RR

He is a liar and I believe has delusions of grandure.. The emperor has no clothes and few supporters. He and the Republicans like the Democrats can not be trusted.

94 posted on 06/16/2007 7:45:48 PM PDT by ears_to_hear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ears_to_hear
Does anyone still believe Bush is a Christian?

No, I think, if not before, something Satanic happened at Skull and Bones. Other people, however, are worshipping false prophets and talking about hallowed light around the man's head.

95 posted on 06/16/2007 8:02:46 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen
He was his daddys representative with the religious right when the senior ran. He made connections and learned the language. I believe he played us like a violin as does most of congress. They say one thing and walk another.

The skull and cross bones is a haven for the elite liberal children of the connected. Yes I agree it is evil!

96 posted on 06/16/2007 8:11:36 PM PDT by ears_to_hear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: ears_to_hear
I believe he played us like a violin as does most of congress. They say one thing and walk another.

Unbelievable. And now he's busy making connections with everyone but Americans. I'd say I was played until right after the '04 election when he started flagrantly working toward the SPP and maligning the Minutemen.

I have seen some specials on the Skull and Bones stuff... and the evil hand gestures the members make such as the "hang ten." Who knows what the real truth is with that, but it still creeps me out to see historical and current-day (wanna-be) nobility using that sign.

97 posted on 06/16/2007 8:23:26 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

Just say NO to Illegal Alien Amnesty!! Keep calling!! It’s NOT OVER!!

U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121

U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121

White House comments: (202) 456-1111

Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep

Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm


98 posted on 06/16/2007 8:59:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Love your tagline.


99 posted on 06/16/2007 9:08:02 PM PDT by hoosierpearl (To God be the glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim
"Debra Burlingame: “…Michelle Malkin has a phrase, “It is not over, legally, until the alien wins.” I went through this bill … I went directly to border security because that was what interested me most. Every single provision has this phrase before you get to the details, “Subject to the availability of funds.” ... That's what they do when they pass these bills, they hold back the funds."

these lieing scumbags think they're so clever...

100 posted on 06/16/2007 9:19:26 PM PDT by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson