Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Infamous "Duke 88" (Professors Who Adjudged Lacross Guilty) To be Huge Civil Suit Targets
Dinner with other lawyers | MB26

Posted on 06/17/2007 6:25:09 AM PDT by MindBender26

A group of local lawyers all went to dinner least night.

Topic was Nifong and the damages NC will pay to the accused. There are questions of sovereign immunity, of course, and other issues but we all agreed that this was only the tip of the litigious iceberg.

In the civil litigation that is sure to follow, Nifong is one target, with few dollars, etc. The real targets will be the Duke 88. These are the professors who signed the now infamous letter adjudging the lacrosse players guilty and worse. That letter was then published as a full page ad in local newspapers and reprinted across the country..

These professors acted as individuals, with no corporate protection, insurance or shield. They acted outside their employment by Duke, etc. As such, they can be attacked and picked off, one at a time, with full and unrestricted individual liability, as targets of libel, slander and false light litigation. With no insurance, they wil even have to pay for their own lawyers.

Plaintiffs are well within statute of limitations.

Of course, as soon as one professor is served, he/she will go running to his/her lawyer. Their lawyer will play “let’s make a deal” by implicating others. Then they will sue the most hated professor, which will set the high dollar damages expectation for the rest of the cases. Others will then want to settle fast.

Even better, each of the three plaintiffs cam move separately against all 88 individually. The profs will fold like a house of cards.

Lots of fun. Big dollars.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: duke; duke88; dukelax; dukeprofessors; gangof88; liberals; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-478 next last
To: MindBender26

On a tangentially related note, I called my Congressional rep last week, and suggested a new federal law, namely, that if you frame someone, falsely testify, or knowingly falsely prosecute someone, and you are convicted, your punishment would then be the same as the crime you framed, falsely testified, or falsely prosecuted the other person for. If enacted, the Nifongs of the future would jail time equivalent to multiple (at least three) counts of felony rape.


21 posted on 06/17/2007 6:34:24 AM PDT by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
87 of them have written another letter. And the beat goes on.
22 posted on 06/17/2007 6:34:43 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (Any means, fair or foul, to defeat the islamic filth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

I wonder if each of the teachers can be targeted separately by each of the guys convicted. Triple the number of lawsuits against each teacher. At least then, if the teachers get past one jury, they have two more to clear and that much more in legal fees. As Tony Montana said in Scarface, “I bury you cockaroaches.”


23 posted on 06/17/2007 6:35:03 AM PDT by jgilbert63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
A lot of damage and misery from the false accusations of one low-life Black girl and we are told "it will serve no use purpose to prosecute."

Justice in America. We've lost it folks.

24 posted on 06/17/2007 6:35:15 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

YEAH!!!!!!!!!!


25 posted on 06/17/2007 6:35:17 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her Phoniness is Genuine!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Durham-in-Wonderland
26 posted on 06/17/2007 6:35:24 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

and country codes, too


27 posted on 06/17/2007 6:35:31 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

For me, Schadenfeude. ;-/. For once political correctness, class envy gets what it deserves.


28 posted on 06/17/2007 6:35:32 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHOa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

I mentioned the other day, something must be done to these professors. I’m hoping, hoping, hoping. It will be fun to watch the rats run.


29 posted on 06/17/2007 6:35:40 AM PDT by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jgilbert63

Each of the guys charged...not convicted


30 posted on 06/17/2007 6:35:52 AM PDT by jgilbert63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CaptainMorgantown

here it is:
http://listening.nfshost.com/listening.htm

my favorite part, read the fine print at the bottom

“We thank the following departments and programs for signing onto this ad with African & African American Studies: Romance Studies; Psychology: Social and Health Sciences;
Franklin Humanities Institute; Critical U.S. Studies; Art, Art History, and Visual Studies; Classical Studies; Asian & African Languages & Literature; Women’s Studies; Latino/a
Studies; Latin American and Caribbean Studies; Medieval and Renaissance Studies; European Studies; Program in Education; and the Center for Documentary Studies. Because
of space limitations, the names of individual faculty and staff who signed on in support may be read at the AAAS website:http://www.duke.edu/web/africanameric";


31 posted on 06/17/2007 6:38:33 AM PDT by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

After yesterday, I’m sure every shark below the Mason Dixon Line can smell the blood in the water in North Carolina...


32 posted on 06/17/2007 6:38:46 AM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
A link to the original ad is available in the article I just linked above.
33 posted on 06/17/2007 6:38:49 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (Any means, fair or foul, to defeat the islamic filth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Sounds like a fun night!

Don’t forget the deep pockets of Time-Warner, owners of Court TV, home of the lovely slanderer, Nancy Grace.


34 posted on 06/17/2007 6:39:14 AM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jgilbert63

not even not convicted, i believe they were declared innocent and no crime occured.


35 posted on 06/17/2007 6:39:25 AM PDT by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Thanks for the Father’s Day Present. That made my day!!!!


36 posted on 06/17/2007 6:39:28 AM PDT by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

100 percent agree. The young men have been damaged. The 88 should pay.


37 posted on 06/17/2007 6:39:32 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
It will server those “politically right” & “probably leftist”, professor right. Those pompous bastards need to learn that they are too not above the law!
38 posted on 06/17/2007 6:39:48 AM PDT by RAY (God Bless the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
For too long, the Left has gotten away with slander because the worst they can say or write about other Americans fits their ideology and psychological needs. It’s high time they had to pay for this slander.
39 posted on 06/17/2007 6:40:00 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Al Qaeda knows Iraq's strategic value, yet the Democrats work day and night for our defeat there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Those faculty and many of the media programs that skewered the 3 young men. CourtTV comes to mind for their coverage.

I posted this comment during the live thread yesterday:

Nifong Court Findings Being Read Now!!!
  Posted by TomGuy to SandRat
On News/Activism 06/16/2007 2:03:43 PM CDT · 68 of 152

The 80-some faculty at Duke may be on the phones to their lawyers, too. They may still have culpability for their published letter.


40 posted on 06/17/2007 6:40:24 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-478 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson