Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: All
Any SC FReepers know if any of these mentioned will run?
2 posted on
06/17/2007 12:53:54 PM PDT by
TornadoAlley3
(The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.)
To: TornadoAlley3
If only 3,000 have expressed opposition, then the popular Graham must be a shoo-in for 2008. I suspect that 3,000 was recorded, but several thousand others could not get through.
3 posted on
06/17/2007 12:55:26 PM PDT by
Theodore R.
(Cowardice is forever!)
To: TornadoAlley3
Not just in South Carolina.....Goober Grahamnesty has gone NATION-WIDE!
5 posted on
06/17/2007 12:56:57 PM PDT by
RasterMaster
(Rudy, Romney & McCain = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party - Duncan Hunter, President 2008)
To: TornadoAlley3
Bloggers challenge his manhood, assault his patriotism, mock his intellect. And for good reason.
Grahamnesty is an effeminate, globalist moron.
7 posted on
06/17/2007 12:57:36 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
(There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy)
To: TornadoAlley3
Just another political Schmuck.
Another quasi socialist hack; perhaps a bit lighter in the combat boots than others, and with a bit less connective substance in the joining of the wrist to the hand. Say Good Night Lindsey!
8 posted on
06/17/2007 12:58:28 PM PDT by
Gideon T. Reader
(DEMOCRATS: Not quite American. PALESTINIANS: A proud history of mindless violence since 1964.)
To: TornadoAlley3
Strom is rolling in his grave about now. Goober must go.
9 posted on
06/17/2007 1:00:14 PM PDT by
VRWC For Truth
(Bush and McCain - the axes of domestic incompetence from CFR to La Raza)
To: TornadoAlley3
Priceless
12 posted on
06/17/2007 1:03:04 PM PDT by
VRWC For Truth
(Bush and McCain - the axes of domestic incompetence from CFR to La Raza)
To: TornadoAlley3
"Anyone who runs against me better get up early and stay late because I think I've been one heck of a good senator for my state and my party," *snicker*
He's been reading too many of his own press releases. Methinks Goober is in for one heck of a surprise!
17 posted on
06/17/2007 1:26:09 PM PDT by
Gritty
(This (1986) amnesty will secure the borders. We will never again bring forth another-Teddy Kennedy)
To: TornadoAlley3
Graham wasn’t concerned about his various stands in the Senate, because he really thought he would be on the McCain-Graham ticket and become VP in 08.
Now, with McCain’s declining poll numbers, Graham may be in search of a Plan B.
18 posted on
06/17/2007 1:27:10 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: TornadoAlley3
Bloggers challenge his manhood, assault his patriotism, mock his intellect.
I'm guilty of one of these three and, I am so sorry. NOT!!!
19 posted on
06/17/2007 1:29:20 PM PDT by
no dems
(Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my gun.)
To: TornadoAlley3
Hmmm...looks like Ravenel could become one of those younger Senators that Lott will need to
reign in.
OFFICE OF STATE TREASURER
Thomas Ravenel
21 posted on
06/17/2007 1:45:48 PM PDT by
Plutarch
(Bush is a coward to the left and a tyrant to the right.)
To: TornadoAlley3
Is the immigration issue hurting Lindsey Graham's image in South Carolina?
Is a hog's keyster pork?
Do wild bears defecate in the woods?
Is Mortimer Snerd pine?
Do mice like cheese?
22 posted on
06/17/2007 1:52:29 PM PDT by
attiladhun2
(Islam is a despotism so vile that it would warm the heart of Orwell's Big Brother)
To: TornadoAlley3
Lindsey Graham along with every supporter of amnesty whether they be Republican Democrat or Independent needs to be thrown out of office when their next election comes about.
They also should be stoned in the public square a.s.a.p.
To: TornadoAlley3
Graham's staff estimates that his Senate offices have received about 3,000 letters, phone calls, e-mails and faxes about immigration in the last month, most of them critical of him. Talk-radio hosts within and beyond South Carolina deride Graham as a Ted Kennedy toady. 3,000? Graham's staff must be as incompetent as he is when it comes to counting, or some people aren't doing there job. THERE SHOULD BE 3,000 calls faxes and emails by tommorrow! Getrrr done!
Feinstein wanted 30,000 calls and she won't admit to how many she has gotten, Why not?
To: TornadoAlley3
Many of us were done with him when he joined the gang of 14. This just cinches it. Now Graham is one of the best Democrats out there.
26 posted on
06/17/2007 2:11:02 PM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: TornadoAlley3
27 posted on
06/17/2007 2:17:39 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: TornadoAlley3
"Anyone who runs against me better get up early and stay late because I think I've been one heck of a good senator for my state and my party," Graham said Thursday in an interview. "I intend to seek office on the basis that I am not afraid to do what needs to be done." Well, if this doesn't reek of pure Washington arrogance and elitism. My advice to SC conservatives, assuming Graham survives the primary challenge, is to simply stay home and let the Rat win. And I better not read any of this "But Graham's still a Republican! Half a loaf is better than none" garbage that's going to pollute the Forum next Fall from the GOP butt-smoochers urging us to hold our nose once again.
To: TornadoAlley3
With Graham's high national as well as statewide name recognition and his campaign war chest approaching $4 million, GOP political operatives say, any window for mounting a viable campaign against him is closing fast.This is sad and cynical and what is wrong with the GOP. No one has to defeat Graham, he is doing a fine job of that himself. Graham is counting on the money in his warchest scaring off primary challengers. I believe a good decent candidate running a common sense campaign can beat unseat Graham with a lot less money. Graham is there for the taking, the anger is against Graham is there, a bold candidate will take this opportunity and run with it.
32 posted on
06/17/2007 2:29:24 PM PDT by
Biblebelter
(I can't believe people still watch TV with the sound on.)
To: All
I will send $500 to any challenger.
“Constitutional Qualifications for Senator
According to Article I, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, a senator must be 30 years of age, a citizen of the United States for 9 years, and must reside in the state he or she represents at the time of election.”
Nowhere in our Constitution does it say you must be rich or a powerbroker. Some young upstart could be gaining signatures right now and with talk radio’s and the web help be heard from.
At the debates simply say, “You know I just watched “Mr. Smith goes to Washington”, and after seeing that I see Sen. Graham has moved away from the needs of SC, into the hands of the corporate world. He’s lost touch”>
34 posted on
06/17/2007 2:34:52 PM PDT by
Sybeck1
(Amnesty GOP members are betting on a Clinton nomination, to get their support back!)
To: TornadoAlley3
re: GOP political operatives say, any window for mounting a viable campaign against him is closing fast.)))
OK. Drag your feet.
How about a Democrat mounting a viable campaign against him? Rahm Immanuel--find a conservative Dem, and you've got a new seat in the Senate.
Grahamnesty--hah. Think you're invulnerable? Think again.
35 posted on
06/17/2007 2:40:08 PM PDT by
Mamzelle
("Mr. Elite Pro-Amnesty Republican--has your family ever employed illegal labor?")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson