Skip to comments.
Soldiers and Marines march to admirals' orders
St. Louis Post-Dispatch ^
| 16 JUNE 2007
| Harry Levins
Posted on 06/17/2007 2:04:11 PM PDT by radar101
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: A.A. Cunningham
That was the comment she made AFTER her public denuciation of them...
21
posted on
06/17/2007 3:19:04 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: RedRover
"Remember the uproar from the media about this statement that should have been greeted with applause? Can't have our warriors being too warlike..."
LOL! No, I didn't. But that's the kind of talk that goes through recruits for about the first three months (tougher Army specialties, too). Such sardonic humor and/or desensitization helps combat soldiers and Marines get through their initial training. Most of it is really about humility. ...keeps 'em from being too emotional later on.
People should be moral but not so sensitive about warfare--especially when a high ranking officer says something like that. Most of them are nerds, IMO.
22
posted on
06/17/2007 4:14:52 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. [(cbt.)--has-been])
To: SoldierMedic
"I don't want somebody leading me who thinks about the repurcussions of walking into a mosque to kill a sniper, or the right way to say "I surrender" without looking weak. I want somebody who knows how to kick ass and take names, somebody who know how to defeat and keep down the enemy in the Area of Operation. How many ports do Iraq and Afghanistan have? Not enough to warrant a squid leading a ground force."
Here's another consideration. Naval forces (except Marines and Seals, who are more like soldiers) are, strategically, like artillery on the water. Admirals are like artillery commanders in that sense.
Do we want a top commander who has always been in charge of men who call for fire or a top commander who has always been in charge of those who provide the fire?
...the former, IMO, because we always want that fire to get there, when it's requested.
23
posted on
06/17/2007 4:26:00 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. [(cbt.)--has-been])
To: rlmorel
"Eleanor Roosevelt, communist that she was, thought the Marines were 'brutes'."
She apparently hadn't been around many Marines. Small arms (combat) Marines are some of the toughest and coolest (polite, even) in the field. The two attributes go together.
24
posted on
06/17/2007 4:34:25 PM PDT
by
familyop
To: radar101
So why was Mattis passed over? Says Peters: "He's too blunt, too honest, too much of a fighter. That's the last thing Washington a coward like Bush wants."
To: familyop
Have a look at
this. The media's panties were in a major twist.
26
posted on
06/17/2007 4:45:32 PM PDT
by
RedRover
(Defend our Marines)
To: SolidWood
27
posted on
06/17/2007 4:57:20 PM PDT
by
mathurine
(ua)
To: RedRover
"Have a look at this. The media's panties were in a major twist."
I looked. You're right!
Our government, education and business leaders have been playing a game of who can be the most sensitive and bothered by humor from men. ...survival of the most effeminate.
That will change, after the enemy detonates nukes and starts a chain of exchanges.
28
posted on
06/17/2007 5:10:45 PM PDT
by
familyop
(Most people who've been civilians all of their lives believe that Sinbad thinks just like them.)
To: gcruse
"Uh, Rice answers to Bush. Shes not autonomous. The $hit has to be up the hill before it can roll down."
That's the way it was before our nation became so feminized.
29
posted on
06/17/2007 5:14:30 PM PDT
by
familyop
(Duncan Hunter for President!)
To: familyop
Must be all that estrogen in the water supply.
30
posted on
06/17/2007 5:18:58 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: radar101
I think the answer is one of control right now. In the US mainland and on the ground elsewhere the Navy can’t do squat. They can make your day miserable but they cannot stick a gun behind your ear and end it like the Army and Marines can. The Navy is put in charge because there is apparently fear and Navy ships don’t sail on dry land.
31
posted on
06/17/2007 5:23:59 PM PDT
by
Modok
To: familyop
One thing about the Navy: since WW2, we haven't had major naval battles where naval officers could distinguish themselves in actual fighting
In the Navy, for the past few decades, the ones who got promoted were the ones who avoided making glaring mistakes like letting your ship run aground. The mentality of being the last one standing who didn't make a visible mistake is not necessarily something we need
32
posted on
06/17/2007 5:31:45 PM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(Open Season rocks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymLJz3N8ayI)
To: SauronOfMordor
"...where naval officers could distinguish themselves in actual fighting..."
With all due respect, this man contradicts that statement.
33
posted on
06/17/2007 8:46:39 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: rlmorel
With all due respect, this man contradicts that statement. I stand corrected. I had been thinking about blue-water ship-on-ship clashes, rather than carrier-based aviators, who did indeed distinguish themselves in actions all the way to the present
Admiral Fallon the new CENTCOM commander, is also a carrier aviator
34
posted on
06/18/2007 2:27:14 PM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(Open Season rocks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymLJz3N8ayI)
To: SauronOfMordor
I knew what you meant...I was just poking you in semi-fun, as an ex-swabbie.
Adm. Stockdale is one of my personal heroes. It was one of my life’s to-do’s to meet him and shake his hand. Sadly, he has passed on. I wrote a letter to his widow, a wonderful woman by all accounts.
The book “In Love and War” is a great read.
35
posted on
06/18/2007 3:53:49 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: radar101
"They're doing it because a Navy guy is the only one who can get confirmed in the Senate," Peters said. Geez. Insanity reigns.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson