Posted on 06/17/2007 2:04:11 PM PDT by radar101
In the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the heavy lifting falls to the soldiers and Marines on the ground. So why are all the key command jobs going to sailors?
In March, Navy Adm. William Fallon took over the top spot at the U.S. Central Command. He replaced a soldier, Gen. John Abizaid. Now, Navy Adm. Mike Mullen stands poised to take over as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He'll replace a Marine, Gen. Peter Pace.
Well, that figures. The Navy tends to operate by itself, out at sea.
Besides, says Owens, naval officers tend to see more of the world than their ground counterparts. . His conclusion: "You're more likely to get geopolitical thinkers from the Navy than you are from the Army or Marine Corps."
He gets a second from military writer (and retired Army officer) Ralph Peters, author of the soon-to-be-released "Wars of Blood and Faith." But Peters sees a darker side to the recent rise of the admirals.
"They're doing it because a Navy guy is the only one who can get confirmed in the Senate," Peters said.
He quickly adds, "Don't get me wrong. Mullen has great credentials."
But if Peters were choosing a new chief, he'd pick the same man as Owens: Marine Lt. Gen. James Mattis.
So why was Mattis passed over? Says Peters: "He's too blunt, too honest, too much of a fighter. That's the last thing Washington wants."
(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...
This is why.
Commander’s veto sank Gulf buildup (Admiral Fallon opposes military move against Iran?)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1834992/posts
Top US War Boss: We Can’t Ignore Iran [No other way but “arrangement” with Iran.]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1840806/posts
Military action in Iran not in anyones interest, says Gates
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1843874/posts
Gates declines to say who is winning war on terror
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1844996/posts
They have to do what Commander-in-Chief Rice tells them to do. And some of her advice comes from the Board that Thompson is on.
Of course he is. He's a Marine
Yep. This is why they are Marines.
Eleanor Roosevelt, communist that she was, thought the Marines were “brutes”.
Dumb ass liberals like Eleanor Roosevelt and the lot of them today just do not understand it. Marines are good at what they do, because they can do what must be done when it needs doing.
BUMP!
Was going to ping you.
I don’t give a crap what any of them say. Gen. Pace is a good man, and a damned fine Marine.
As is Mattis. He would have this ex-squid’s vote.
It takes a fighter to put an end to fight. If Harry Truman had listened to Douglas MacArthur we wouldn't be worrying about N Korea having nukes.
“The Marines I have seen around the world have the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds, the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank God for the United States Marine Corps!” Eleanor Roosevelt
Sounds like Eleanor really tried to sound patriotic, but the commie shined through.
Isn’t that General Matis the CG at Campen?
W
Indeed it is.
More rubble, less trouble.
There are also white hats fighting in the mountains in Afghanistan.
You can’t put the various military branches in a seperate cube as in previous wars.
There is much inter division then in the past.
Hmmm. Franklin? Marine?
Who to choose? Who do I choose?
Uh, Rice answers to Bush. She’s not autonomous. The $hit has to be up the hill before it can roll down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.