Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roberts, Alito Help Define New Supreme Court (Kennedy Coming Around to Roberts' Camp?)
MSNBC ^ | June 18, 2007 | Tom Curry

Posted on 06/18/2007 3:55:55 PM PDT by RWR8189

WASHINGTON - Iraq remains chaotic and immigration overhaul faces an uncertain fate.

But if President Bush wants to sing the old tune, “They can’t take that away from me” he can turn to the Supreme Court where his appointees Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel Alito sit.

As the high court nears the end of its 2006-2007 term, the impact of Bush’s appointees is becoming clearer.

In high profile-decisions, Roberts and Alito have bolstered the conservative wing, which includes Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and occasionally Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Former Reagan administration Justice Department official Doug Kmiec, who is professor of constitutional law at Pepperdine University, said, "The headline of the term so far" is that "Anthony Kennedy in the presence of John Roberts and Sam Alito has rejoined the Reagan judicial philosophy." (President Reagan nominated Kennedy to the court in 1987.)

Roberts-Kennedy alignment "Justice Kennedy and the chief justice are thinking along similar lines," Kmiec said. "I don't think that's an accident. I believe it is a conscious result of the respect the new Chief Justice has given Justice Kennedy and the simple fact that they like each other."

He added that when Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, whom Alito replaced, was on the court, "Kennedy was largely in conversation with her. She was the one with whom he would bargain over terminology. In her absence, Justice Kennedy, of course, has been pursued by both sides of the court, but in virtually every case, Justice Kennedy has discovered that he is more in affinity with the Roberts-Alito side of legal thought."

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alito; anthonykennedy; roberts; robertscourt; scotus

1 posted on 06/18/2007 3:56:02 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

yeah, Jorge!!!!


2 posted on 06/18/2007 4:07:29 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
It's the MOST won-der-ful tiiiime, OF, THE-YEAR!
3 posted on 06/18/2007 4:08:52 PM PDT by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
That’s why I voted for GWB and why I will vote for FDT in ‘08. We’ve got to get SCOTUS actually reading the Constitution again, not adding to it.
4 posted on 06/18/2007 4:12:56 PM PDT by pangaea6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
and immigration overhaul faces an uncertain fate.

Well, that's a cheery blurb. Doesn't make it sound certain, the way the person in the Oval stated a few days ago.

"The headline of the term so far" is that "Anthony Kennedy in the presence of John Roberts and Sam Alito has rejoined the Reagan judicial philosophy." (President Reagan nominated Kennedy to the court in 1987.) Roberts-Kennedy alignment "Justice Kennedy and the chief justice are thinking along similar lines," Kmiec said. "I don't think that's an accident. I believe it is a conscious result of the respect the new Chief Justice has given Justice Kennedy and the simple fact that they like each other."

Simpy, awesome.

I had a good feeling if anyone could convert Kennedy back to the reservation, it would be Roberts. Wouldn't state we are there yet. But with Sandra exiting, his bestest friend evah!, Kennedy was either going to drift seeking the good relations of the social set in D.C. (Left) or Roberts' acknowedged charm and intelligence was going to rope him back in. Nice to see, so far, it's the latter.

5 posted on 06/18/2007 4:25:47 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"Justice Kennedy and the chief justice are thinking along similar lines," Kmiec said. "I don't think that's an accident. I believe it is a conscious result of the respect the new Chief Justice has given Justice Kennedy and the simple fact that they like each other."

: )

6 posted on 06/18/2007 4:37:06 PM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

Everything I have read about Roberts indicates he is super-intelligent and well-liked. That is a powerful combination.


7 posted on 06/18/2007 7:11:17 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush

I like Scalia and I like guys like Scalia; I’m kind of one of them, truth over politics sort of approach. Not very effective in building relationships though. I get the same impression about Thomas. Now with Roberts, Alito, Kennedy maybe there is a real center to the court. Wouldn’t that be nice?


8 posted on 06/18/2007 7:50:00 PM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

anything to counter that evil bitch ginsburg and breyer is hardly better-stevens might be worse than breyer-and souter has turned out to be a traitor and i suspect light in the loafers-if just one of them expires or has to leave in the near future bush will have a chance to salvage part of his presidency-his judicial appointmants have been great-but i cannot forgive his traitorous conduct on immigration manesty


9 posted on 06/19/2007 5:57:25 AM PDT by steamroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Good! Maybe we can get a victory in Parker, assuming that DC appeals it to the USSC.
10 posted on 06/19/2007 8:43:25 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Click here to smell the Incense at www.PositivelyAveMaria.com


11 posted on 06/22/2007 7:58:52 AM PDT by Notwithstanding ("You are either with America in our time of need or you are not" - W? No, 'twas Sen. Hillary 9/12/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson