SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  WOT  HomosexualAgenda  Corruption  Taxes  Bush  Congress  Elections  ObamaTruthFile  Rally  WalterReed  GatheringOfEagles  MAF  TalkRadio  Donate 
Contribute to FR: $10 $20 $50 $100 Other

Lets git 'er done: Make it a monthly!

2008 Q3 FReepathon. Target: $76,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $36,643
48%  
Woo hoo!! Over 48%!! Way to go FReepers and Lurkers!! Thank you all very much!!

Keyword: anthonykennedy

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • The High Court's Supreme Clown

    07/04/2008 12:09:44 PM PDT · by T.L.Sink · 17 replies · 635+ views
    New York Post ^ | July 4, '08 | Rich Lowry
    Kennedy is the court's most important swing vote and its worst justice. He expects the nation to bend to his moral whimsy. He said "You know, in any given year, we may make more important decisions than the legislative branch does - precluding foreign affairs, perhaps." He was wise to include the "perhaps," in light of the recent Guantanamo decision. He went on to note how judges need an "understanding that you have an opportunity to shape the destiny of the country." So much for country's destiny being shaped by a free people acting through their legislative institutions.On any politically...
  • The Manifold Dangers of a Liberal Supreme Court

    07/04/2008 6:49:12 AM PDT · by K-oneTexas · 25 replies · 497+ views
    Family Security Matters ^ | 4 July 2008 | Christopher Adamo
    July 4, 2008 The Manifold Dangers of a Liberal Supreme Court Christopher AdamoAs far back as Sun Tzu, military strategists have well understood the concept that victory in war does not require the destruction of one's enemy, but merely convincing that enemy that destruction is inevitable if the fight continues. Similarly, in a dictatorship, absolute control is neither necessary nor, in most cases, even possible. All that is needed for the dictator to endure is the presumption among the underlings that the leader does indeed hold a monopoly of power. It is a point that Americans ought to seriously...
  • Some Evolution: The fraudulent “consensus” behind the Supreme Court’s child-rape ruling

    07/03/2008 1:07:28 PM PDT · by mojito · 13 replies · 475+ views
    National Review Online ^ | 7/2/2008 | Andrew McCarthy
    When our rulers on the Supreme Court invalidated the State of Louisiana's death penalty for child rapists — in the case appropriately titled Kennedy v. Louisiana, decided June 25 — Justice Kennedy and the Court's liberal bloc insisted that the Eighth Amendment does not mean what it meant when it was adopted. Rather, the question of what is "cruel and unusual" punishment is answered by "the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society." Such gobbledygook is the mark of Left-liberal hauteur. In an arrested-development society, getting older is not necessarily maturing, and chronological maturation is...
  • Our Worst Justice

    07/01/2008 10:55:09 AM PDT · by K-oneTexas · 5 replies · 525+ views
    Townhall.com ^ | June 30, 2008 | Rich Lowry
    Our Worst Justice by Rich Lowry Why did the Founders bother toiling in the summer heat of Philadelphia in 1787 writing a Constitution when they could have relied on the consciences of Supreme Court justices like Anthony Kennedy instead? Kennedy is the Supreme Court's most important swing vote and its worst justice. Whatever else you think of them, a Justice Scalia or Ginsburg has a consistent judicial philosophy, while Kennedy expects the nation to bend to his moral whimsy. With apologies to Louis XIV, Kennedy might as well declare "la constitution, c'est moi!" In a 2005 interview, Kennedy said of...
  • Justice Anthony Kennedy and Our Schizophrenic Supreme Court

    06/29/2008 1:02:05 PM PDT · by Free ThinkerNY · 26 replies · 782+ views
    americanthinker.com ^ | June 29, 2008 | Larrey Anderson
    Conservatives were, rightly, thrilled by the recent Supreme Court decision that affirmed our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Not so fast. Of the four important decisions the court has rendered in this term, three of them have gone the wrong way. Let's first take a brief look at each of these four cases. Then let us examine Justice Anthony Kennedy's thinking in these cases. Kennedy was either the deciding "swing vote" or the determining factor in each one. The only case correctly decided was (1) District of Columbia v. Heller. Justice Scalia wrote the Heller decision, which holds...
  • The Republic of Kennedy

    06/27/2008 5:27:02 AM PDT · by Zakeet · 13 replies · 511+ views
    Creators.com ^ | June 27, 2008 | Mona Charen
    In the United States today we no longer enjoy the rule of law but instead the rule of lawyers — robed lawyers with the exalted title "justice" — but still unelected lawyers enacting their own policy preferences. Before their commonsense decision in the Second Amendment case, a different complement of justices (Justice Anthony Kennedy siding with the liberals) demonstrated what a flimsy hold the words of the Constitution have on our jurisprudence. In fact, when you consider that the court is pretty well divided between four liberals and four conservatives with Justice Kennedy swinging from one side to another as...
  • Don’t You Know There’s a War Going On?

    06/16/2008 8:52:49 AM PDT · by K-oneTexas · 21 replies · 657+ views
    Family Security Matters ^ | 16 June 2008 | Jeffrey Imm
    Don’t You Know There’s a War Going On? Jeffrey Imm I am sending U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy a framed copy of a photograph of the remains of the World Trade Center West building after the 9/11 attacks with a note "Don't You Know There's A War On?" The Real Headline: "U.S. Supreme Court Doesn't Think We Are At War with Jihad"On June 12, 2008, the majority on the Supreme Court ruled in "Boumediene v. Bush," that habeas corpus rights guaranteed to American citizens under the Constitution will be extended to foreign Jihadist enemy combatants currently held at the...
  • Caption This: Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy

    06/13/2008 8:40:41 AM PDT · by weegee · 40 replies · 507+ views
    AP Via Yahoo ^ | Fri Jun 13, 10:20 AM ET | AP Photo/Charles Dharapak
    Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy arrives for a roundtable discussion titled 'Making Law Work for Everyone', Friday, June 13, 2008, at the Organization of American (OAS) in Washington. In writing for the court majority on the Supreme Court's decision on Guantanamo Bay on Thursday, Kennedy acknowledged the terrorism threat the country faces and the administration's justification for the detentions, but he declared, 'The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times.' (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright arrive for a roundtable discussion titled 'Making...
  • Justices Agree on Right to Own Guns (YES!)

    03/18/2008 3:26:06 PM PDT · by radar101 · 71 replies · 2,005+ views
    North County Times ^ | 18 MARCH 2008 | MARK SHERMAN
    WASHINGTON - Americans have a right to own guns, Supreme Court justices declared Tuesday in a historic and lively debate that could lead to the most significant interpretation of the Second Amendment since its ratification two centuries ago. Governments have a right to regulate those firearms, a majority of justices seemed to agree. But there was less apparent agreement on the case they were arguing: whether Washington's ban on handguns goes too far. The justices dug deeply into arguments on one of the Constitution's most hotly debated provisions as demonstrators shouted slogans outside. Guns are an American right, argued one...
  • (Supreme Court Justice Anthony) Kennedy urges action against injustice

    08/13/2007 9:49:13 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 24 replies · 601+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 8/13/07 | AP
    SAN FRANCISCO - Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy painted a dismal picture of injustice and lack of opportunity in much of the world, then told lawyers Monday that they must do something. Kennedy used a ceremony in which the American Bar Association presented him its highest award to talk about the plight of rape victims who must pay a fee before they file a complaint, young girls used by their families to have sex with tourists, prisoners who develop gangrene because they get no medical care. "The rule of law and your own freedom are not secure unless you address...
  • Court ruling hints at new abortion stance

    07/21/2007 2:56:02 AM PDT · by monomaniac · 3 replies · 411+ views
    politico.com ^ | Jul 18, 2007 | Chris Gacek
    Undoubtedly, the most significant aspect of the Supreme Court's April decision in Gonzales v. Carhart was that it narrowly upheld Congress' "partial-birth abortion" ban. That said, Justice Anthony Kennedy's opinion may affect America more for what it said about abortion than what it decreed about the law of abortion. The case appears to have opened up a new phase in abortion jurisprudence -- one in which abortion is largely permitted though disdained. This is not surprising, because Carhart represents the first recent occasion on which Kennedy set our national abortion policy. What may be surprising is how greatly both sides...
  • Roberts, Alito Help Define New Supreme Court (Kennedy Coming Around to Roberts' Camp?)

    06/18/2007 3:55:55 PM PDT · by RWR8189 · 10 replies · 929+ views
    MSNBC ^ | June 18, 2007 | Tom Curry
    WASHINGTON - Iraq remains chaotic and immigration overhaul faces an uncertain fate. But if President Bush wants to sing the old tune, “They can’t take that away from me” he can turn to the Supreme Court where his appointees Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel Alito sit. As the high court nears the end of its 2006-2007 term, the impact of Bush’s appointees is becoming clearer. In high profile-decisions, Roberts and Alito have bolstered the conservative wing, which includes Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and occasionally Justice Anthony Kennedy. Former Reagan administration Justice Department official Doug Kmiec,...
  • Top court, abortion seen as 2008 campaign issue

    05/20/2007 4:01:20 PM PDT · by 2ndDivisionVet · 14 replies · 853+ views
    Reuters ^ | May 20, 2007 | James Vicini
    The next U.S. president could reshape the Supreme Court, where the two oldest members are liberals and volatile decisions like abortion now hinge on a single swing vote. The possible sea change has already surfaced 18 months before the November 2008 election and could develop into a major campaign issue for Democrats who want to move the court to the left and Republicans who hope to plant it firmly in the conservative camp. The U.S. high court is now evenly split between conservative and liberal justices, who have been divided by 5-4 votes on abortion rights, the death penalty and...
  • Father Knows Best (Dr. Kennedy's magic prescription for indecisive women)

    04/19/2007 1:19:49 AM PDT · by RWR8189 · 3 replies · 484+ views
    Slate ^ | April 19, 2007 | Dahlia Lithwick
    The key to comprehending the Supreme Court's ruling today in Gonzales v. Carhart upholding the federal partial-birth abortion ban is a mastery not of constitutional law but of a literary type. Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion is less about the scope of abortion regulation than an announcement of an astonishing new test: Hereinafter, on the morally and legally thorny question of abortion, the proposed rule should be weighed against the gauzy sensitivities of that iconic literary creature: the Inconstant Female. Kennedy invokes The Woman Who Changed Her Mind not once, but twice today. His opinion is a love song to...
  • Key U.S. justice opposes use of race in school cases

    12/04/2006 1:24:16 PM PST · by NinoFan · 26 replies · 1,092+ views
    Reuters ^ | December 4th, 2006 | James Vicini
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A justice who may cast the decisive vote on the closely divided U.S. Supreme Court on Monday sharply criticized using race to decide where students go to school. "You're characterizing each student by reason of the color of his or her skin," Justice Anthony Kennedy told a lawyer for one of two school districts arguing before the high court. "It seems to me that that should only be, if ever allowed, allowed as a last resort." The Supreme Court justices considered the two cases that could affect millions of students nationwide by deciding whether the U.S. Constitution's...
  • Court Reinstates Calif. Man's Execution

    11/13/2006 7:57:58 AM PST · by SmithL · 20 replies · 995+ views
    AP ^ | 11/13/6
    The Supreme Court on Monday moved to reinstate the death penalty for a California man convicted of murdering a 19-year-old woman during a burglary. Justices reversed an appeals court ruling that threw out Fernando Belmontes' death sentence because the trial judge misled jurors who were considering whether to give Belmontes the death penalty or life in prison. The 5-4 decision was the court's first since starting its new term in October. Justice Anthony Kennedy said it was implausible to conclude that jurors failed to take all the evidence into account before settling on a sentence of death. Belmontes beat Steacy...
  • Supreme Court Partial Birth Abortion Case - "I'm Convinced Kennedy will vote with Us"

    11/08/2006 2:41:32 PM PST · by wagglebee · 63 replies · 1,954+ views
    LifeSiteNews ^ | 11/8/06 | John-Henry Westen
    WASHINGTON, November 8, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Moments after the hearing of oral arguments in the partial-birth abortion case before the United States Supreme Court today, a pro-life lawyer involved in the case is predicting a "major victory". Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), said that he is convinced the ban on partial birth abortion will be ruled constitutional. The ACLJ has filed amicus briefs in both cases before the Supreme Court - including one on behalf of some 80 members of Congress - including the sponsors of the federal ban on the gruesome...
  • Pro-Life Attorney: Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Hinges on Kennedy Vote

    11/05/2006 10:44:32 AM PST · by wagglebee · 16 replies · 737+ views
    Life News ^ | 11/5/06 | Steven Ertelt
    Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A pro-life attorney says he thinks next week's hearing on a Congressional partial-birth abortion ban will lead to a vote that will ultimately hinge on Justice Anthony Kennedy. Kennedy voted with the minority in upholding a Nebraska ban in a previous case but the pro-abortion justice's vote is never certain. His vote may also be less certain with the court's previous deciding vote in close cases -- Justice Sandra Day O'Connor -- now retired. The high court is slated to hear oral arguments in cases on Wednesday involving two of the federal challenges abortion advocates filed...
  • Justice Kennedy takes 'center' stage on court

    10/22/2006 10:20:25 AM PDT · by Norman Bates · 21 replies · 779+ views
    The Washington Times ^ | October 22, 2006 | Associated Press
    When Anthony M. Kennedy takes his seat among the black-robed justices of the Supreme Court, his presence behind the raised mahogany bench is remarkably unremarkable. There is nothing of the buttoned-down manner of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., the professorial mien of Ruth Bader Ginsburg or the biting wit of Antonin Scalia. Genial and unassuming, Justice Kennedy poses questions without any display of theatrics. Outside the courthouse, tourists have been known to enlist his help snapping photos, unaware that they are pressing a justice into service. Yet after 18 years on the court, at 70, Justice Kennedy has emerged...
  • Justice Kennedy had stent procedure

    09/05/2006 2:52:18 PM PDT · by lunarbicep · 87 replies · 3,697+ views
    go.reuters.com ^ | Tue Sep 5, 2006
    U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, a moderate conservative and often decisive vote, was hospitalized for a stent procedure after experiencing mild chest pains, a court spokeswoman said on Tuesday. Spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said Kennedy, 70, underwent "a routine procedure" at Washington Hospital Center on September 2. "This was a revision to a stent procedure performed in November 2005," she said in a brief statement. Arberg said there was no evidence of any heart damage. She said Kennedy was discharged from the hospital on Sunday morning and had returned to his duties at the court, which is currently in recess....
  • Justice Kennedy: Jury's Out on U.S. Democracy

    08/06/2006 8:23:33 AM PDT · by slowhand520 · 31 replies · 1,207+ views
    The AP ^ | Mark Niesse
    Aug 6, 1:13 AM EDT Kennedy: Jury's Out on U.S. Democracy By MARK NIESSE Associated Press Writer HONOLULU (AP) -- The United States is not making the case for freedom, democracy and Western law to the rest of the world, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy said Saturday. "Make no mistake, there's a jury that's out. In half the world, the verdict is not yet in. The commitment to accept the Western idea of democracy has not yet been made, and they are waiting for you to make the case," Kennedy said in an address to the American Bar Association. Kennedy,...
  • Advanced SCOTUS

    07/24/2006 10:44:01 AM PDT · by JSedreporter · 12 replies · 702+ views
    Accuracy in Academia ^ | July 19, 2006 | Matthew Murphy
    On July 1st, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) finished its term until October. The history books may refer to the present court as the “Roberts Court,” named so after current Chief Justice John Roberts, but many analysts are talking about Justice Kennedy. “It is impossible to overstate the importance of Justice Kennedy,” Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News told the audience at the Heritage Foundation last Thursday. A panel of journalists, including Mr. Stohr, Charles Lane of The Washington Post, and Stephen Henderson of McClatchy Newspapers, focused most of their remarks on “Justice Kennedy’s Hamlet moment,” as Mr....
  • Stay of Soledad cross removal extended (to allow for potential review by SCOTUS as needed)

    07/07/2006 8:03:15 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 36 replies · 1,880+ views
    San Diego Union - Tribune ^ | 7/7/06 | Greg Moran
    U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy ordered Friday that his temporary stay protecting the Mount Soledad cross extend until state and federal courts can hear the city of San Diego's appeal this fall. In blocking a federal judge's order that the city remove the cross by Aug. 1 or face a daily fine of $5,000, Kennedy also indicated that the full court may want to review the controversial case. Kennedy said the court, which refused three years ago to get involved in the dispute, may consider it because of two new factors favorable to cross proponents. He cited legislation to...
  • SUPREME COURT ISSUES STAY IN SAN DIEGO CROSS CASE - High court intervenes in fight over cross

    07/03/2006 11:36:51 AM PDT · by Pukin Dog · 209 replies · 7,524+ views
    AP ^ | 7/3/06 | TONI LOCY
    <p>WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court intervened Monday to save a large cross on city property in southern California.</p> <p>A lower court judge had ordered the city of San Diego to remove the cross or be fined $5,000 a day.</p> <p>Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, acting for the high court, issued a stay while supporters of the cross continue their legal fight.</p>
  • No abrupt changes for court -- Justice Kennedy is new swing vote

    07/01/2006 9:58:25 PM PDT · by SmithL · 12 replies · 675+ views
    San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 7/2/6 | Bob Egelko
    President Bush finally got to reshape the Supreme Court during its just-completed 2005-06 term, appointing its first two new members in more than a decade. But he didn't have much immediate success in changing its direction. Bush's appointees, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, lived up to expectations that they would ally with the court's conservative faction. The administration's hopes for a rightward shift on an already-conservative court were largely checked, however, by the pivotal figure of Justice Anthony Kennedy. Kennedy's role was illustrated most dramatically Thursday, the final day of the court's term, when he joined a...
  • Kennedy Serves as Sole Swing Voter (BARF BAG NEEDED)

    07/01/2006 5:53:46 PM PDT · by new yorker 77 · 16 replies · 454+ views
    The Washington Post ^ | July 1, 2006 | Charles Lane
    It was the O'Connor court. Now it may be the Kennedy court. The Supreme Court's just-concluded 2005-2006 term was a historic one, in which two new justices, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Samuel A. Alito Jr., changed the court's style and ideological balance. But by the end of the term, it was clear that the main impact of the turnover was to enhance the influence of a justice who has been at the court since 1988, 70-year-old Anthony M. Kennedy. With the departure of centrist Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the court is now frequently split between two four-justice...
  • 'tis the season for a Supreme Court retirement (vanity)

    06/29/2006 8:54:45 PM PDT · by dangus · 29 replies · 1,933+ views
    None ^ | 6/3/06 | Dan
    As the Supreme Court wraps up its session, there has been so far fairly little attention paid to the fact that this is when U.S. Supreme Court retirements are typically announced. All of the last 14 retirements were announced between May 14th and October 1st of their respective years; the last to retire outside of those dates was Charles Whittaker, whose doctor ordered him to retire on account of a worsening disability making it impossible for him to sit at his bench. Of those 14, 9 announced their retirement between June 12 and August 3rd, a space of only seven...
  • High Court Saves Some Best Cases for Last

    06/24/2006 2:17:14 PM PDT · by wagglebee · 42 replies · 1,138+ views
    My Way News ^ | 6/24/06 | GINA HOLLAND/AP
    WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court has had divisive rulings this year on the environment, police power and whistleblowers, and the justices are not even through with their hardest cases. The high court is on a tight deadline to finish before July, when justices begin a three-month break that provides time for traveling, teaching classes, writing books and relaxing. As usual, justices have left some of the most significant cases to the very end. There are 10 rulings left, on issues from a president's wartime powers, capital punishment, Texas' political boundaries and the insanity defense. The past year has been...
  • Swing Justice (Anthony Kennedy attacks the media and wonders if liberals hate him)

    04/06/2006 11:41:42 AM PDT · by RWR8189 · 15 replies · 1,294+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | April 6, 2006 | The Editors
    Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy lashed out at our humble profession last week, castigating editorial writers whom he said frequently "misinterpret" the Court's reasoning, according to an article in Monday's Washington Post. The Justice didn't single out any newspaper, though we'll admit to having referred to his jurisprudence on more than one occasion as "protean." We'd humbly reply to Justice Kennedy that it is precisely this trait that has invited such media mau-mauing. While nominated as a conservative by Ronald Reagan, Justice Kennedy has proven on the High Court that he is open for intellectual rent: from his flip-flop on...
  • Anthony Kennedy Is Ready for His Close-Up

    04/03/2006 7:38:25 AM PDT · by RWR8189 · 10 replies · 1,219+ views
    New York Times ^ | April 3, 2006 | Adam Cohen
    At last week's oral argument in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, probably the term's most important case, the outcome was all but decided when Justice Anthony Kennedy spoke. He strongly suggested by his questions that he would join the four moderate justices in rejecting the Bush administration's position on a key aspect of its war-on-terror powers. That would be enough, because these days, the law is pretty much what Justice Kennedy says it is. With Sandra Day O'Connor's retirement, there is a new swing justice in town. If the court's two newest members, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel Alito...
  • U.S. Supreme Court Justice Kennedy visits Farrington, Hawaii

    02/11/2006 9:59:29 AM PST · by new yorker 77 · 19 replies · 517+ views
    The Honolulu Star-Bulletin ^ | February 8, 2006 | Debra Barayuga
    Students shouldn't take freedom for granted, and the Constitution belongs to them as well as lawyers and judges, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said at Farrington High School yesterday. They need to know the meaning of freedom and pass it onto others less fortunate for democracy to flourish, Kennedy said. He quoted Thomas Jefferson, who once said: "Democracy depends on a virtuous enlightened people." "Overall, I'm very concerned that people think democracy is on automatic pilot -- and it isn't," Kennedy said, before addressing a group of about 150 Farrington and Kahuku High juniors and seniors. "It...
  • The Most Powerful Man in America

    01/31/2006 1:43:01 PM PST · by Always Right · 58 replies · 1,585+ views
    Self | 1-31-06 | Always Right
    The most powerful man in America has the last name of Kennedy, but thankfully is not named Teddy and is no relation to JFK. You could make the case that the President or the Federal Chairman is more powerful, but for my money Justice Anthony McLeod Kennedy is now the most powerful man in America. With the appointment of Justice Alito, the Supreme Court is split with 4 solidly liberal justices and 4 solidly conservative justices, leaving Kennedy to decide the controversial cases. Justice Anthony Kennedy was born July 23, 1936 has been a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court...
  • O'Connor's Rightful Heir? (Newsweek's Justice is Now Kennedy)

    01/22/2006 4:05:44 PM PST · by new yorker 77 · 15 replies · 871+ views
    Newsweek Magazine ^ | January 30, 2006 | Evan Thomas & Stuart Taylor Jr.
    Kennedy may check the Supreme Court's tilt toward the right.The Swing Set: Kennedy chats with O’Connor, who may have penned her last ruling this weekJan. 30, 2006 issue - When conservative Washington lawyers who argue before the Supreme Court talk about "the Greenhouse Effect," they don't mean global warming. The Greenhouse in question is Linda Greenhouse, the longtime and esteemed Supreme Court reporter for The New York Times. The "effect" is to subtly push Supreme Court justices to the left. Unless a jurist comes to the court with very strongly held, or even fixed, conservative views, there is a tendency...
  • Who'll Be the Supreme Court's Next Swinger?

    01/17/2006 9:02:50 AM PST · by SirLinksalot · 41 replies · 1,284+ views
    Law.com ^ | 01/17/2006 | Howard J. Bashman
    Who'll Be the Supreme Court's Next Swinger? Howard J. Bashman Special to Law.com 01-17-2006 When Justice Sandra Day O'Connor finally retires from serving on the U.S. Supreme Court, the high court's center of gravity unquestionably will shift. And some other justice will become the Court's swinger -- that is, the key swing vote. For reasons explained in my essay from last week, I don't expect Samuel A. Alito Jr. to become the Court's newest centrist. Indeed, the smart money is on Justice Anthony M. Kennedy to be the Court's swing vote going forward. Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter,...
  • Swing Time: Anthony Kennedy is the new Sandra Day O'Connor.

    01/18/2006 9:59:57 AM PST · by SirLinksalot · 42 replies · 1,085+ views
    Slate ^ | 01/18/2006 | Dahlia Lithwick
    Anthony Kennedy—the new Sandra Day O'Connor. Lost in last week's cacophony about the critical role of Sandra Day O'Connor as sole and exclusive swing voter on the U.S. Supreme Court was any sign of respect for the other sole and exclusive swing voter on the U.S. Supreme Court: Anthony M. Kennedy. Kennedy's majority opinion in today's big physician-assisted-suicide case serves as the perfect reminder of who's going to call the shots in the near future. The 6-3 opinion in Gonzales v. Oregon—a decision upholding Oregon's physician-assisted-suicide law from attack by the Attorney General's Office—sharply outlines the court's Anthony Kennedy-shaped future....
  • Justice Kennedy's soaring ambitions

    11/15/2005 12:08:07 PM PST · by JZelle · 11 replies · 732+ views
    The Washington Times ^ | 11-15-05 | Bruce Fein
    Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy keenly relishes acting as an ethical or moral beacon. He boasts that the high court's policy encyclicals endow the justices with greater power than elected lawmakers, with the possible exception of foreign affairs. Justice Kennedy's playing Platonic Guardian under the umbrella of the Constitution might be redeemed were he blessed with uncommon wisdom and dazzling insights. But his observations about the human condition are a best jejune and at worst sophomoric. Justice Kennedy illustrates why President George W. Bush should stick to Supreme Court nominees in the mold of Robert Bork, Antonin Scalia and Clarence...
  • Justice Kennedy Shares Foreign Policy Views

    11/07/2005 5:17:15 AM PST · by Crackingham · 38 replies · 956+ views
    Washington Post ^ | 11/7/5 | Charles Lane
    Members of the Supreme Court generally shy away from public opining about the state of U.S. foreign relations. But Justice Anthony Kennedy offered a few concerns on the subject in a little-noticed talk he gave to a gathering of international dignitaries and graduate students in New York not long ago. "My major concern is that what I thought was the golden age of peace seems farther from our reach than I would have thought 10 years ago," he said June 3 at the annual International Summit of the Academy of Achievement, a U.S. nonprofit organization that honors big names in...
  • WSJ: Religion and the Court - The instructive case of Anthony Kennedy.

    10/11/2005 5:41:49 AM PDT · by OESY · 27 replies · 782+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | October 11, 2005 | Editorial
    ...Allow us to recall the case of Anthony Kennedy.... Mr. Helms said to Judge Kennedy, "I think you know where I stand on abortion." Mr. Kennedy "smiled and answered, 'Indeed I do and I admire it. I am a practicing Catholic.'"... "...Mr. Helms interpreted the response to mean that Judge Kennedy is opposed to abortion and would look favorably on any case in which the Court's earlier decision striking down the abortion laws of all 50 states might be overturned." Reagan nominated Mr. Kennedy, who dodged the abortion issue at his confirmation hearings. Mr. Helms voted for him. And we...
  • WSJ: Judicial Tourism - What's wrong with the U.S. Supreme Court citing foreign law.

    09/16/2005 5:38:41 AM PDT · by OESY · 16 replies · 702+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | September 16, 2005 | MARY ANN GLENDON
    References to foreign law in Supreme Court opinions have become controversial.... True, the references have increased somewhat, but they remain rare, and no one suggests that the court has directly based any of its interpretations of the Constitution on foreign authority. As the issue was framed recently in a debate between Justices Stephen Breyer and Antonin Scalia, it comes down to this: The former says that if a judge abroad has dealt with a similar problem, "Why don't I read what he says if it's similar enough? Maybe I'll learn something." Yet the latter would exclude such material as wholly...
  • Once Again, Just Too Conservative (Duke Law Professor Whines About Roberts)

    08/31/2005 2:21:30 PM PDT · by RWR8189 · 35 replies · 777+ views
    Los Angeles Times ^ | August 31, 2005 | Erwin Chemerinsky
    AFTER SPENDING the last month reading countless briefs and memos written by John G. Roberts Jr., it is clear that he would very likely change the law dramatically in key areas such as privacy rights, separation of church and state and racial justice. Democrats need to oppose Roberts for the same reasons they fought against Clement F. Haynsworth Jr. in 1969, Harold Carswell in 1970, Robert Bork in 1987 and Clarence Thomas in 1991. The parallels to the fight over Bork are striking. Bork was nominated to replace Lewis F. Powell Jr., who had been the high court's swing vote...
  • WSJ: 'Comparable Worth' - Don't undermine the free-market system, by Linda Chavez

    08/24/2005 5:27:13 AM PDT · by OESY · 1 replies · 350+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | August 24, 2005 | LINDA CHAVEZ
    ...Comparable worth was intended to eliminate the gap between the earnings of men and women. Feminists argued that only hidden discrimination could explain the relatively lower wages in female-dominated occupations, like librarians, compared to male-dominated jobs, like electricians. Under comparable worth, employers would be required to rate jobs according to abstract notions of intrinsic value based on years of education required for a given job, the level of responsibility it entailed, and working conditions involved. In a free market, however, wages -- like prices -- are set primarily by supply and demand. Diamonds are not intrinsically more valuable than water...
  • WSJ: Snowe Job - Since she's not a co-sponsor of pending bills, maybe she's learned something.

    08/24/2005 5:20:04 AM PDT · by OESY · 2 replies · 469+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | August 24, 2005 | Editorial
    When Anthony Kennedy was nominated for the... Supreme Court in 1987, the president of [NOW] called him "sexist" for ruling against a comparable worth pay system for Washington state when he served on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. This time around, Senator Olympia Snowe is doing the honors for John Roberts. Comp worth... was a feminist rallying cry taken up by Walter Mondale in his 1984 run for President. The idea was to guarantee that women who worked in jobs dominated by women (say, nurses or secretaries) would earn as much as men who worked in "comparable" jobs dominated...
  • Roberts'Gay Bias Case Role Debated(some on FR being played like a fiddle by the LA Times)

    08/05/2005 9:26:55 AM PDT · by Dane · 155 replies · 2,148+ views
    LA Times ^ | 8/05/04 | Maura reynolds
    Roberts did not mention his work on the case in responding to a Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire that asked for examples of his pro bono work. Roberts' involvement was first reported Wednesday by the Los Angeles Times. Jean Dubofsky, the lead lawyer for gay rights activists challenging the Colorado initiative, told The Times that Roberts gave her "absolutely crucial" advice on how to argue the case before the Supreme Court. White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said Roberts spent less than 10 hours on the case, compared with more than 200 hours he spent on two pro bono cases on which...
  • This court is headed to the left - (regardless of how Roberts votes, Kennedy is the new "swinger!")

    07/24/2005 5:01:07 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 13 replies · 1,244+ views
    PITTSBURGH LIVE,COM ^ | JULY 24, 2005 | QUENTIN LANGLEY
    With, so far, only Ann Coulter stepping outside the conservative consensus and suggesting that John G. Roberts Jr., could be another David Souter, let me be the first to say that the next session of the Supreme Court will see it moving to the left. And this prediction applies however Roberts turns out. Even if he consistently votes with Clarence Thomas, the next session of the Supreme Court will produce more left-wing rulings than this one has done. In the short-term at least, conservatives will come to regret O'Connor's retirement. It is partly a matter of arithmetic and partly a...
  • Joseph Farah: "On John Roberts"

    07/21/2005 7:06:36 AM PDT · by Theodore R. · 74 replies · 1,853+ views
    WND.com ^ | 07-21-05 | Farah, Joseph
    On John Roberts -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: July 21, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern © 2005 WorldNetDaily.com President Bush's selection of John Roberts as Supreme Court nominee to replace Sandra Day O'Connor is being hailed as a stroke of genius. He has the likely opposition off balance because the nominee does not have a record of writings and positions that can be easily attacked and challenged. He is said to be a very nice man with a nice family and to possess a brilliant legal mind. At first blush, Roberts seems to be an acceptable choice for Americans who still believe in the...
  • Anthony Kennedy for Chief Justice? (FReeper suggestion spurs National Review debate)

    07/08/2005 11:20:56 PM PDT · by dangus · 26 replies · 10,184+ views
    Yesterday, I sent this letter to Kathryn Jean Lopez, an edited version of a vanity column I posted on Free Republic: {start} I propose that Bush should consider nominating Anthony Kennedy to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The Democrats are clamoring for nominations in the mold of O'Connor. Kennedy, while having a different focus than O'Connor, is just about exactly as conservative or liberal as O'Connor. And, until a third vacancy occurs, Kennedy will be the swing vote on just about every issue, so Kennedy will be the de facto chief of the Supreme Court anyway. Essentially, it...
  • Here's a wacky idea: Anthony Kennedy for Chief Justice!

    07/08/2005 12:27:20 PM PDT · by dangus · 144 replies · 2,484+ views
    Vanity ^ | Now | Me
    With O'Connor already announcing her intention to retire, Rehnquist leaving us with only a question of when, and the strong likelihood of 85-year-old Stevens or Ginsburg retiring by 2008, I propose that Bush should consider nominating Anthony Kennedy to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Don't get me wrong: I'd love to watch Nancy Pelosi's head explode as Clarence Thomas or Antonin Scalia were promoted. But the viscreal thrill of it aside (and yes, I know I'm a junkie when I can refer to the "visceral thrill "of a Supreme Court nomination), it wouldn't do much. "Chief Justice" has...
  • Their Will Be Done

    07/05/2005 4:58:48 AM PDT · by docbnj · 10 replies · 753+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | 5 Jul 2005 | Robert Bork
    Contrast Tocqueville with Justices Harry Blackmun and Anthony Kennedy. Blackmun wanted to create a constitutional right to homosexual sodomy because of the asserted "'moral fact' that a person belongs to himself and not others nor to society as a whole." Justice Kennedy, writing for six justices, did invent that right, declaring that "At the heart of [constitutional] liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life." Neither of these vaporings has the remotest basis in the actual Constitution and neither has any definable meaning other than...
  • Supreme quotas? - (Thomas Sowell: "Sandra Day O'Connor was a mistake from the beginning! right!)

    07/02/2005 4:06:54 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 61 replies · 1,778+ views
    TOWNHALL.COM ^ | JULY 2, 2005 | THOMAS SOWELL
    My reaction to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's retirement was almost as positive as my reaction in 1981 was negative when the Reagan administration announced that they were going to appoint a woman to the Supreme Court. It wouldn't matter if all nine Justices of the Supreme Court were women, if these were the nine best people available. But to decide in advance that you were going to appoint a woman and then look only among women for a nominee was a dangerous gamble with a court that has become dangerous enough otherwise. The recent outrageous Supreme Court decision making anyone's...
  • Black-robed Robin Hoods - (picture Ruth Bader Ginsberg in snug green tights, for starters..WOW!)

    06/27/2005 10:45:35 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 27 replies · 1,194+ views
    WORLD NET DAILY.COM ^ | JUNE 26, 2005 | BARBARA SIMPSON
    Picture this: Ruth Bader Ginsberg wearing a snug, green outfit, complete with tights. Then picture four of her high-court compatriots, John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer doing the same. It's a tough visual, I admit, but given their property-rights ruling, we now know what those members of the U.S. Supreme Court must be wearing under their black robes. Think "jolly, old England" and the fellow in the green outfit who stole from the rich to give to the poor. He didn't do it alone. Robin Hood had his band of merry men to help. It wasn't...