Try re-reading my post 6. You seem to have missed the point. Or are you possibly presenting strawman arguments knowingly?
Your basic point, as I understood it, seemed to be that the content of science classes should not be determined by what "most people" seem to think is right.
My point is that in areas where there is controversy (and the Evo debate has controversy, in case you missed it) then teaching both sides would seem to be an appropriate way to present the material.
My further point is that the side that doesn't want both sides presented (that's the Evo side) would seem to be fearful that their side will be unable to mount a case which is more compelling that their competition (that's the anti-Evo side).
I think the Evolutionists want their beliefs taken on faith. I do think Evolution has become a religion.