Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo
After reading the Luftwaffe pilot's account of flying early variant MiG-29s against NATO, I have renewed respect for the MiGs. If what that pilot said is true, then this sentence should be taken very seriously:

"In a situation where neither side had external advantages, when flown by pilots of comparable skill, and armed with similar missiles, it is likely that a MiG-35 would be an even adversary at least for any Israeli opponent, and any American aircraft other than the F-22A."

We don't have that many F-22s and it's anyone's guess as to the quality of the F-35 and whether or not it can live up to it's hype. And, let's not forget the Sukhois. All of these aircraft are being fielded by other countries, especially China. In the meantime, Russia is still making improvements to their aircraft (as are we, I hope).

16 posted on 06/22/2007 7:23:14 AM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: GBA

They have good birds ... always will. But, they lack alot of intangilbles. We have decades of combat experience, from WWII to Korea to Vietnam to the Middle East. Russian and Chinese Air Forces haven’t faced a real air to air enviroment since the early 1950’s. We have grown and learned and adapted based on experience and have developed a complete system of battle management that is combat tested. It isn’t just the pilot and warplane. They have great warplanes ... but we have better everything else from pilots to AWACS to electronic warfare to command and control, etc.

The only thing we are untested in and could cause problems against a major foes (Russia and China) would be facing an enemy with the ability to hit our airbases hard with SSM and cruise missile capability. Operating combat ops under fire with critical infrastructure degraded or destroyed is something we haven’t had to face in a long time. We train for it, but this is an area where our systems are untested.

As for dealing with Syria or Iran ... these would be nice birds in their inventory ... but would be meaningless in the overall balance against us or Israel because of their shortcomings in so many other key areas.


20 posted on 06/22/2007 7:34:28 AM PDT by Mac94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: GBA; Yo-Yo

The Israeli F-16C and F-15Cs are armed with Python 4 and now Python 5. Like the A-11/R-73 Archer, this is a helmet-sited all aspect missile capable of firing more than 180 degrees off the axis of the fighter. However the Israeli missiles are newer. The Python 4 has a range of 20km, 5km more than the A-11. The Python 5 could be the most advanced IR missle on earth. With a range of 25km, it recognizes the IR signature and image or the opposing fighter, rather than locking onto a heat source.


49 posted on 06/28/2007 7:35:22 PM PDT by rmlew (Build a wall, attrit the illegals, end the anchor babies, Americanize Immigrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: GBA

Also, don’t forget that Russia is going to deploy PAK-FA next year. The PAK-FA looks like an F-23.


55 posted on 07/13/2007 12:29:01 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson