Skip to comments.DFU PRESENTS - Hillary Clinton Felonies Caught on Tape is now on YouTube - send it everywhere!
Posted on 06/22/2007 5:23:59 PM PDT by doug from upland
THIS TAPE IS EVIDENCE OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAUD
Clear evidence is now available for all to see. Hillary Clinton and her agents solicited, participated, and coordinated an illegal hard money, in-kind, $1.6 million donation from Peter Paul.
For six years, her attorney, spokesholes, and hired political thugs have denied that she did anything wrong. David Kendall has been saying she fully cooperated. That is simply not true. To the best of our knowledge neither she nor Kelly Craighead has testified before the FEC. Neither of them was called in the David Rosen criminal case. That case was a sham with a presiding judge who was a Clinton appointee.
Finally, we are getting closer and closer to the magic day when Hillary is going to have to raise her right hand and be grilled by someone who will not be as meek and mild as Ken Starr.
I was in the courtroom of Judge Aurelio Munoz in Los Angeles Superior Court on April 7, 2006. Kendall produced Hillary's sworn declaration that I have labeled as a work of fiction.
In that declaration, however, Hillary made one gigantic error. She accidentally told the truth when she said:
"In the summer of 2000, I knew Mr. Gary Smith and believed his work to be professional and of very high quality. I remember that he was asked to produce a fundraising event for my Senate campaign, which was held on August 12, 2000."
"For my Senate campaign." She did not say it was for her joint fundraising committee, which might have had some wiggle room as a soft money contribution. This was hard money and illegal from the outset.
Peter Paul's attorney fought for two years to have this and other of Peter's tapes released that were being held by a U.S. Attorney. Because it was withheld, the evidence was not available in the trial of David Rosen, in the FEC investigations, or in the Senate Ethics Committee that cleared her of wrongdoing.
We need your help to get this in the hands of journalists. Please make comments on the YouTube thread and make sure everyone on your email list sees it.
hopefully hillary’s campaign will implode.
lots of democraps do not like her.
Please ping your list and ask for their help to get this out there.
We have to make sure that supporters of Obama and Edwards see this. Come on, folks, I need all of your help. Get this on the blogs. Thanks.
It would be nice if this story had traction but we all know that the lame-stream press will do nothing with it because they handle Shrillary with kid gloves.
Hey, that attorney is pretty good.
Never trust anyone who wears sunglasses indoors, at night .......
bump to the top
Excuse me, but I am tired of hearing that crap from people. You have a choice. You can just sit on your butt and whine about it or try to do something to help. Which is it going to be?
I apologize for being so caustic. It is not a good excuse, but I’ve been working on this since about 4:30 a.m. I really need your help to advance this story because I’m getting pretty worn out.
This is awesome! I will send it to everyone I know. I only wish I knew more people to send it to. The MSM is not as much of a factor as it used to be. The word can be spread this way. YouTube rocks! This should snowball. Good job Doug!
I recently met with a major newspaper journalist and a major news magazine journalist. They are both investigating the story. Also, I spoke yesterday with a reporter from one the three news networks who is looking at the story.
27 views already.
For those who don’t understand, the federal limit in 2000 was a $2,000 hard money contribution. Because this $1.6 mil was solicited and coordinated by Hillary and her agents, it was all hard money and illegal. Hillary, the smartest woman in the world, knew it was illegal. She just didn’t think she’d get caught. She never thought this evidence, being held by a U.S. Attorney, would ever see the light of day. Wrong, Hillary.
Nice. You should be able to give Ted Rall a run for his money at this year's SnideFest.
Hillary’s sick-o-fants will be giving the video low ratings. Please go to YouTube and rate it. If you have time, please leave a comment. (Don’t use foul language as Hillary would normally use.)
Yeah, that would be... oh... waitaminit...
OMG... ending Hillary's campaign might be the biggest favor anyone's done for the Democrats!
P.S. Doug, I know you're tired and cranky, so for the record, I'm kidding. Keeping Hillary out of the White House will be a favor to Democrats because it will be a favor to everyone on the planet. Good work.
You’ve got to see this!
Thanks for clearing it up. Yeah, I’m tired. I don’t get much sleep since I still have to run a business and earn a living.
pardon “scooter” clinton.
Hilliary: Do not look at those websites. I will be very, very angry and make life very unpleasant for you. You know what I’m talkin' about.
Hmmmm, fits right in with her Sopranos video.
Stan Lee: Oh, yea you’ve got the mutant vote.That cracked me up...lol
Sept. 28, 2001
RYAN, PHILLIPS, UTRECHT & MACKINNON
Complainant specifically alleges that he made contributions of $1.9 million, both cash and in-kind, to the Hillary Rodham Clinton for U.S. Senate Committee and that the committee "improperly and/or inaccurately reported" the contributions. The evidence cited by Complainant, however, directly contradicts his claim. The August 12,2000 event was a joint findraiser held by New York Senate 2000, it was not a Hillary Rodham Clinton for U.S. Senate Committee event. Any payments for costs associated with the event made by third parties would be in-kind contributions to the joint fundraising committee. Complainant alleges, without any evidence supporting his claim, that he "personally financed the entire event." His contribution then, if it were actually made, would have been an in-kind contribution to the joint fundraising committee - not the Hillary Rodham Clinton for U.S. Senate Committee. Neither Senator Clinton, nor her campaign committee were responsible for reporting contributions made to New York Senate 2000. And New York Senate 2000 would not be responsible for reporting contributions from Complainant that were not made.
Lyn Utrecht and James Lamb (signed by Lyn Utrecht)
Now, let me help you mainstream media journalists so you understand what this all means. Pay attention. Hillary has admitted in a sworn declaration that the Hollywood Gala was for her Senate campaign. That meant that all of the money spent by Peter Paul in excess of $2,000 WAS ILLEGAL. He actually had given a $2,000 check at the Spago lunch he sponsored (so did his wife). Howard Wolfson, Hillary's lying weasel spokesman, was trotted out a few days after the Gala and made a public pronouncement that the $2,000 was being returned. Of course, after Peter's two decades old involvement in the Cuban Coffee Caper was revealed, they would take no money from Peter Paul.
The depositions should indeed be very interesting. We are getting closer. It is easy to misspeak, and we all occasionally do that. It is less easy to make an error while writing. When you swear to a declaration, however, there is no room for misspeaking or making an error. Hillary thought it out carefully and, although she didn't mean to do it, she told the truth in that sentence. The fundraiser was for her Senate campaign.
It will also be interesting to see what the attorneys will say who claimed that the money from Peter Paul was for the joint committee, not Hillary's Senate campaign. In an official communication to a government agency that was conducting an official investigation, did they deliberately lie? That would be a felony and subject them to being prosecuted and disbarred.
Hillary helped solicit and coordinate the Gala. Over $1.6 million was a hard money donation from its inception. It was illegal from its inception. It is the largest campaign finance fraud in history. Journalists, I hope that has been helpful. We've done much of your work for you. Write the damn story!
Bless you dfu, you and Mark Levine are my heros. I’ll get on line and blast em.
Doug, do you know if Rush Limbaugh has any interest in this?
Limbaugh mentioned it once last year. But that was before this tape. Peter got this less than a month ago. When he saw it on the list from the Dept of Justice, he was shocked to see, 5-MINUTE CONFERENCE CALL, HILLARY CLINTON. He had forgotten about it. I hope that this video finally changes everything. This was not just some esoteric hard money vs. soft money miscalculation. It is a major felony. She, of course, will never do time. But let’s hope this can put a figurative stake in the vampire’s heart.
How long until they make Hillary the victim here?
Created a YouTube account and the current rating is 5 STARS! Thanks again Doug!
A one paragraph summary would be nice.
Can someone explain the difference between hard and soft money for this particular instance?
You say, “Because this $1.6 mil was solicited and coordinated by Hillary and her agents, it was all hard money and illegal.”
This is confusing. I may not be the only one here who’s confused.
Anybody here have a way to get this noticed by Rush... or Hannity... or ??
I apologized. Check out how the Clinton’s collapsed Stan Lee Media -— http://youtube.com/watch?v=LUWlxc7h5AI
Summary: a wicked witch solicits a huge amount of money from a Hollywood mogul (HM). The man makes a deal with her husband - he will come to work for his company as a rainmaker if he becomes a major donor to her campaign. HM spends almost two million dollars. Behind the scenes, the witch and her husband steal the Japanese business partner. When the business partner’s additional $5 mil does not come into the company as promised, because of the Clinton’s interference, the company collapses. The witch, her weasel attorney, her lying spokesman, and her sick-o-fants have been lying about it for over six years. Evidence was withheld while investigations were ongoing. She was cleared of wrongdoing because critical evidence had been hidden. The witch has so far gotten away with four false FEC reports, a false declaration, and the biggest campaign finance fraud in history.
Was this withheld from the grand jury?
Soft money is a contribution that is given to a party or committee. I don’t know whether there is a current limit, especially since the money is used on phony websites like mediamatters (backed by Soros). The limit for a hard money contribution, a donation of a check directly to one candidate, was $2,000 at the time. An in-kind donation, such as paying hard dollars for a campaign expense, is also hard money.
I think this would be a good idea. Maybe a simple timeline of events, offenses. Or just chronological bullet points.
"Two for the price of one."
When David Rosen was tried, they didn’t have this tape. Rosen got away with saying he didn’t know how much Peter had spent. Had the prosecutor not thrown the case like the 1919 Black Sox, he would have called Kelly Craighead, Hillary, Peter, and Aaron Tonken. Rosen was part of the conference call on July 11 in which Peter was solicited and the cost was discussed as over a million dollars. Rosen didn’t know? My butt.
This evidence was not available to the FEC when they cleared Hillary. It was not available to the Senate Ethics Committee, which simply used the flawed FEC investigation to say Hillary did nothing wrong.
This tape is going to be the subject of a new FEC complaint and a complaint to the Senate Ethics Committee.
Doug, who brings these complaints before the FEC and the Senate Ethics Committee.?
Faved and subed on youtube
Awesome work Doug!!!
I think Doug now needs protection from the Clintons.
Be careful and thanks for your work.
Thank you Spirit. I’ll send Doug’s U-Tube and this thread links out to friends.
“For six years, her attorney, spokesholes, and hired political thugs have denied that she did anything wrong”
Here it is gang, Doug coins another gem Attorney Spokesholes”
I believe that will be handled by Peter’s attorney, but I think anyone can send them evidence and ask for an investigation. Perhaps a million requests of the chairman would be interesting.
I have to give credit for “spokesholes” to John Kobyld of the John and Ken show on KFI in Los Angeles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.