To: ahayes
I used Google.
Could have fooled me. You didn't read the studies. I doubt anyone else here read the studies.
I'm reading the statistics which say that the scare tactics used to push this vaccine are a lie.
247 posted on
06/26/2007 8:32:46 AM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: DJ MacWoW
You're twisting the findings to serve your own purposes. The low efficacy rates you keep trumpeting are for women who already have HPV. Since vaccines are preventative, pointing out they don't work so well when someone is already sick is rather anticlimactic. On the other hand, you seem to purposefully ignore the fact that this vaccine is highly effective for women who do not have HPV.
249 posted on
06/26/2007 8:36:28 AM PDT by
ahayes
("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
To: DJ MacWoW
Wondering—would you be so vehemently opposed to a vaccine to prevent brain cancer or skin cancer, which cause approximately as many deaths annually as cervical cancer?
250 posted on
06/26/2007 8:44:28 AM PDT by
ahayes
("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson