You have been consistent in this, and I thank you for it.
I vote "nay" and "yea" on common descent. Abiogenesis [life from non-life] is impossible on the basis of information content.
That is simply a refined version of the Second Law argument against evolution. My objection to such formulations is that they suggest an end to certain lines of research.
That is simply a refined version of the Second Law argument against evolution. My objection to such formulations is that they suggest an end to certain lines of research.
My objection is that they are bad science, and misapply the Second Law.
Of a truth, the formula in thermodynamics for Gibbs entropy is very similar to Shannon. This discussion is illuminating:
But, at a more philosophical level, connections can be made between thermodynamic and informational entropy, although it took many years in the development of the theories of statistical mechanics and information theory to make the relationship fully apparent. In fact, in the view of Jaynes (1957), thermodynamics should be seen as an application of Shannon's information theory: the thermodynamic entropy is interpreted as being an estimate of the amount of further Shannon information needed to define the detailed microscopic state of the system, that remains uncommunicated by a description solely in terms of the macroscopic variables of classical thermodynamics. For example, adding heat to a system increases its thermodynamic entropy because it increases the number of possible microscopic states that it could be in, thus making any complete state description longer. (See article: maximum entropy thermodynamics). Maxwell's demon (hypothetically) reduces the thermodynamic entropy of a system using information about the states of individual molecules; but, as Landauer (from 1961) and co-workers have shown, the demon himself must increase his own thermodynamic entropy in the process, by at least the amount of Shannon information he proposes to first acquire and store; and so the total entropy does not decrease (which resolves the paradox).
IOW, even though I aver that abiogenesis is impossible due to information content - I am glad to see it researched. But if the investigators only look at the physical/chemical they will get no further than Miller/Urey. They need to follow Wimmer's lead, and look to the information content. Likewise, I consider the race to find the source of information in the universe to be a good thing.
Oh, and I should mention that it has always been a Jewish mystic understanding that we will be held accountable before God for asking questions about this physical world. IOW, God wants us to look and see. That is also Scriptural to us as Christians:
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. - Romans 1:18-21
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge. [There is] no speech nor language, [where] their voice is not heard. Psalms 19:1-3