[hosepipe]

[.. Just exactly when, and by who's proclamation did Dawkins become science personified? / I'm not interested in helping you start a flame war. If we're down to dismissal and derision then I'm done with it. ..]

WELL then CALM DOWN.. I'm not upset at all.. They are just "QUESTIONS"...

Dawkins stands as posterboy for some science masters.. not all..
Dawkins book is agressive and honest about his "Observations"..
How can "WE" determine each others stance on things without engagement with each other..

This(FR) is not a scientific journal but a mostly political website..
Logic must be persued to observe the tactics involved.. like that..

[tacticalogic]

Logic must be persued to observe the tactics involved.. like that..

This started over what seemed to be a fairly straighforward, logical question. Given that both dogma and observeration may be either true or false, how do we test them to make that determination?

Testing observations doesn't seem to be particularly problematic - we do it all the time.

Testing dogma seems to be a different proposition altogether. So much so that the original comparison seems to be of little no practical consequence.