Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
Doctrines and traditions are not considered "theory" - but indeed, it is the tendency of groups to splinter off - usually based on greater/lesser/different emphasis on specific doctrines or traditions.
559 posted on 07/02/2007 12:57:38 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
Doctrines and traditions are not considered "theory" - but indeed, it is the tendency of groups to splinter off - usually based on greater/lesser/different emphasis on specific doctrines or traditions.

I have no idea where you are going with this.

I asserted that saying "nature did it" is different from saying "god did it" because one can follow up by describing the processes of nature in ever increasing detail.

You have described ID as the claim that some unknown and unnamed entity having unknown abilities, limitations, methods and motives, did some unspecified thing at unspecified times.

This is not at all equivalent to saying in ever increasing detail, that all living things are related by descent, and that all physical sciences -- physics, chemistry, geology, astronomy -- must support this conclusion, and that all evidence discovered from this time forward, must be consistent with the claim.

566 posted on 07/02/2007 1:09:52 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson