Skip to comments.
Searching for humanity (ROGER EBERT SLAPS AMERICANS AROUND IN 'A MIGHTY HEART' REVIEW)
Chicago Sun-Times ^
| 6/22/07
| Roger Ebert
Posted on 06/23/2007 2:55:27 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
I think it was Tom Wolfe who referred to this as adjectival catch-up:
"His kidnappers have transported him outside the zone of human values and common sense. We reflect that the majority of Muslims do not approve of the behavior of Islamic terrorists, just as the majority of Americans disapprove of the war in Iraq."
"The Americans who complain about "negative" news are the ideological cousins of those who shoot at CNN crews. The news is the news, good or bad, and those who resent being informed of it are pitiful. More Americans are well-informed about current sports and auto-racing statistics, I sometimes think, than anything else."
See? We're just like the terrorists, at least in Roger's warped mind.
To: Chi-townChief
just as the majority of Americans disapprove of the war in IraqOne wonders what 'the majority of Americans' would poll, but for the relentless hammering of the war by the liberal media...
2
posted on
06/23/2007 2:58:39 PM PDT
by
IncPen
(The Liberal's Reward is Self Disgust)
To: Chi-townChief
I had a chance to see this movie last monday at a preview and instead I snuck into another movie to avoid doing so.
3
posted on
06/23/2007 3:02:35 PM PDT
by
xp38
To: Chi-townChief
The Americans who complain about "negative" news are the ideological cousins of those who shoot at CNN crews.WTF? Roger needs to spend some time with the head sawer offers and then get back to us.
To: Chi-townChief
>We reflect that the majority of Muslims do not approve of the behavior of Islamic terrorists,
....most polls of Muslims (no matter where they are) show that Islamists overwhelmingly sympathize with terrorists....
5
posted on
06/23/2007 3:17:55 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: Chi-townChief
Another knucklehead Ebert film review that puts the kabosh on ever seeing this mindnumbing tedious nonsense.
6
posted on
06/23/2007 3:24:33 PM PDT
by
eleni121
(+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
To: Chi-townChief
We reflect that the majority of Muslims do not approve of the behavior of Islamic terrorists, just as the majority of Americans disapprove of the war in Iraq. What a complete, utter asshole Roger Ebert is.
7
posted on
06/23/2007 3:26:10 PM PDT
by
gridlock
(Vote for Edwards so Hillary can retire, dump Bill, and find love in the arms of a new man...)
To: Chi-townChief
What nonsense. Do you know how many western journalists have been killed in Iraq? 4. All the rest are Iraqi "stringers", many of them actual combatants on the payrolls of the news agencies, and most of even those killed by the terrorists.
8
posted on
06/23/2007 3:29:56 PM PDT
by
JasonC
To: Chi-townChief
Roger Ebert wears lipstick. No I don’t mean a highlight for the TV camera,I mean Roger Ebert wears lipstick !!!
9
posted on
06/23/2007 3:37:36 PM PDT
by
Obie Wan
To: Obie Wan
10
posted on
06/23/2007 3:40:14 PM PDT
by
ustanker
(Secure the border!)
To: Chi-townChief
I don’t give a care about Daniel Pearl. Never did. I guess that makes me a bad American. Daniel Pearl should not have been in Iraq to begin with. Although to see a movie with Angelina would be enticing. I will have to give it more thought when it comes out. I wonder if my wife will want to see this movie...
To: napscoordinator
Daniel Pearl should not have been in Iraq to begin with.He was abducted and murdered in Pakistan.
12
posted on
06/23/2007 3:54:57 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
To: napscoordinator
Psst! Karachi is in Pakistan, not Iraq.
13
posted on
06/23/2007 3:55:11 PM PDT
by
skepsel
To: napscoordinator
Read the thoughtful, powerful commentary of Judea Pearl, his father, and maybe you will.
14
posted on
06/23/2007 3:58:58 PM PDT
by
mjolnir
("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
To: mjolnir
So far the movie, despite good reviews, is tanking at the box office. It may be a good story but I avoided it just because of the way Angelina Jolie banned Fox News from interviews and made everyone else sign contracts allowing them to ask preapproved questions.
To: Tzimisce
[You, quoting Ebert]
We reflect that the majority of Muslims do not approve of the behavior of Islamic terrorists,....
....most polls of Muslims (no matter where they are) show that Islamists overwhelmingly sympathize with terrorists.... Even granting Roger Ebert the favor of a distinction between "Islamists" and "Muslims", and surveying the larger group, I think you may still be right, if you're talking about worldwide Islam, and I suspect Roger's assertion is just wrong.
To: skepsel; Bahbah; napscoordinator; ustanker; Obie Wan; JasonC; gridlock; eleni121; Tzimisce; ...
Debbie Schlussel's take on “A Mighty Heart” is just a little bit more sane. Okay, much, much more sane and utterly superior to Roger Ebert’s (who I pray will return good health, the show he created and hopefully, better reviews) brainwashed excrement.
17
posted on
06/23/2007 4:18:44 PM PDT
by
mjolnir
("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
To: lentulusgracchus
AND YOU WOULD BE RIGHT. Roger is one of those liberals who thinks of Islam as an exotice form of Unitarianism rather than a religion that has been at war with Europeans for a thousand years or more.
18
posted on
06/23/2007 4:25:10 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHOa)
To: Chi-townChief
“The Americans who complain about “negative” news are the ideological cousins of those who shoot at CNN crews. The news is the news, good or bad, and those who resent being informed of it are pitiful. More Americans are well-informed about current sports and auto-racing statistics, I sometimes think, than anything else.”
Well heck, slick. You just peed all over your credibility with that statement. There is no such thing as bias? Then why do liberals complain about FOX News? If all things are equal, why are liberals trying to destroy talk radio?
If America is not well versed on current events, it is because they cannot trust the HONESTY of journalists.
19
posted on
06/23/2007 4:26:26 PM PDT
by
IrishCatholic
(No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
To: mjolnir
Much more actual information in that reveiw. Thanks.
20
posted on
06/23/2007 4:31:23 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson