Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Searching for humanity (ROGER EBERT SLAPS AMERICANS AROUND IN 'A MIGHTY HEART' REVIEW)
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 6/22/07 | Roger Ebert

Posted on 06/23/2007 2:55:27 PM PDT by Chi-townChief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: mjolnir
Thanks for the Schlussel review. She needs to be commeded for even writing about such tripe.


“A Mighty Heart” Tripe alert

21 posted on 06/23/2007 4:38:45 PM PDT by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

How extraordinary: Ebert believes that, in our lively democracy, journalists are meant to be above criticism. He believes that pointing out their biases, their inaccuracies, and their ideological agendas is the moral and substantive equivalent of kidnapping and decapitation. Ebert is a fool. Or perhaps, like many others of his profession, he hates America so much he has lost his reason.


22 posted on 06/23/2007 4:39:35 PM PDT by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Roger needs to spend some time with the head sawer offers and then get back to us.

Even in the U.S., there is sufficient minority support for jihadist violence among Moslems that it should give Roger pause, because it undermines his claim.

He doesn't recognize in his discourse that jihadist violence doesn't require a consensus or a favorable referendum or election to be carried forward.

On the other hand, he is all too quick to award the palm for having "won" the opinion war to his Bush-despiting, news-spinning colleagues, and nailing a moral claim to that, that the Administration and its supporters are morally, intellectually, and politically bankrupt -- and ontologically Wrong about everything.

They just happen to be right on the overall concept, Roger, which is worth something even if your colleagues have filtered and spun their way to a propaganda win at home. (And we'll see about that.)

Roger doesn't seem to have stopped to reflect that the political competition isn't exactly equipped to have the foggiest idea what to do about medieval barbarians who like to kill people. He is, like Michael Moore, too wrapped up in the immediate satisfactions of delivering a verdict against a president he dislikes.

23 posted on 06/23/2007 4:45:43 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Warped indeed!

As for "his pregnant wife, a French radio journalist who conceals her grief behind a cool and calculating facade to help her husband's chances" -- my impression of her was that she was a left-wing nut. A screwball who was still wistfully smirking even after her husband's horrific murder.

24 posted on 06/23/2007 5:00:00 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
The Americans who complain about "negative" news are the ideological cousins of those who shoot at CNN crews. The news is the news, good or bad, and those who resent being informed of it are pitiful.

Mr. Ebert, you are an ass.

25 posted on 06/23/2007 5:07:32 PM PDT by AnnaZ (I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjolnir
A revealing review by her indeed!

The problem with the film is that the Jolie-Pitts do have judgment--against us and not the terrorists or their Islam--and that they have very selective understanding--lenience only for those, ie., Muslims, who hate Jews and hate Americans, looking for that tiny fringe of moderation that's barely on the far, outer margin.

The problem is not with whether or not Mariane Pearl hates those who butchered her husband to death or whether those who helped investigate it were a tiny number of Muslim friends and police who don't represent the dominant anti-Semitic, pan-terrorist thought on the Muslim street.

The problem is that those who butchered her husband were dominated by hate and that they are Muslim. And a propaganda film whitewashing that by a beautiful actress and her metrosexual boyfriend won't make them hate us any less or make Islam any less extremist.

If your heart is so big that your head is buried in the sand, it's not "A Mighty Heart." It's a weak heart, soon to be in cardiac arrest.

26 posted on 06/23/2007 5:13:14 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1855270/posts


27 posted on 06/23/2007 5:14:14 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

As someone who wrote into the Factor said,

“If the mainstream news feels every bomb must be reported, then why don’t they mention every school we have built? Every hospital?”

It’s not the exact letter but a paraphrase.

If every bomb is worthy of mention, as they say, then so is every small victory of our troops also.


28 posted on 06/23/2007 5:25:00 PM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Mariane Pearl reminds us in her book, and the movie reminds us, too, that some 230 other journalists had lost their lives at the time of Pearl's kidnapping, most of them during the conflict in Iraq. That means they proportionately had a higher death rate than combat soldiers.

I don't know what Mariane Pearl wrote but Daniel Pearl was killed in Feb of 2002. There was no Iraq conflict yet. So when did these 230 reporters get killed? Sounds fishy to me.

29 posted on 06/23/2007 7:31:52 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Good on you! What did you see?


30 posted on 06/23/2007 8:47:54 PM PDT by Duke Nukum (One, two! One, two! And through and through)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

That’s good to hear!

Hollywood is one of the best examples of how, as efficient as it is compared to government, the free market is far from complete efficiency. I realize there are numerous artificial barriers to entry, but still, I’m convinced Hollywood knows it could make bigger money by making pro rather than anti American movies.... but they’d rather lose dollars making crap like this, I guess.


31 posted on 06/23/2007 11:32:04 PM PDT by mjolnir ("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Duke Nukum

Ironically another movie filled with limo lefties including Pitt....Oceans 13 but at least the movie was escapist fare and not anti civilization. It was so so but the pass was free in the first place so $0 for Hollywood this time.


32 posted on 06/24/2007 8:17:53 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Okay, I confess I have never had the desire to see one of the new Oceans movie. But the old one with the Rat Pack is okay. And the SCTV parody is golden, IMB.


33 posted on 06/24/2007 10:40:52 AM PDT by Duke Nukum (One, two! One, two! And through and through)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Duke Nukum
"Maudlin's Eleven." Hilarious! Much better than any of that Looney Clooney crap.


34 posted on 06/27/2007 12:47:44 PM PDT by drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: drew

That reminds me I recorded Play It Again, Sam over night. I don’t think I’ve ever seen the whole thing but I’ve seen the SCTV parody with Bob Hope. That was a good one. I forget what it was called but I have all the NBC years of SCTV on DVD.

I don’t think they’re as good after Catherine, Rick, and Dave leave but I Was A Teenage Communist and the parody of The Nutty Professor were pretty good from that time.


35 posted on 06/27/2007 8:41:57 PM PDT by Duke Nukum (Well, Harvey has overcome not only time and space, but any objections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Wow, I knew that Ebert is a leftist twit, but he really goes far off the deep end here. How DARE you equate verbal critics of MSM bias with terrorists murdering journalists, Mr. Ebert? That is a disgusting and obviously absurd comparison that would only occur to the kind of hateful leftist who cannot bear any criticism of the mighty MSM. btw, I thought leftist twits were always in praise of “diversity” of views and “critical” thought?? Turns out that doesn’t apply to anyone outside the MSM consensus of anti-American sedition and treason.

I am happy to note that “A Mighty Heart” has been a huge bomb at the box office, with only around $9 million gross (and a production budget of near $20 million). Maybe it will find a way to earn back its expenses overseas and on DVD release, but it is always good to see such an anti-American propaganda effort fall flat.

Maybe if they’d found a way to tell some FACTS about Islamo-fascist terrorism that would actually be of interest to real Americans. Glad to see their Hollyweird propaganda going down the tubes.....


36 posted on 08/07/2007 11:33:14 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson