Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Hearing Static From Conservative Radio Hosts
Washington Post ^ | June 20, 2007 | onathan Weisman and Shailagh Murray

Posted on 06/24/2007 9:37:05 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo

It was a casual shot across the bow, a shrugged comment last week from Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-Miss.): Advocates of an immigration overhaul would have to "deal" with talk-radio hosts who he said don't know what is in the legislation but want to kill it nonetheless.

The return fire to that passing comment has been withering, as some of the nation's most prominent conservative talkers turn on a man they once defended adamantly.

"When I hear a United States senator say that what I do for a living is a 'problem' that the government has to 'deal with,' you can interpret it any number of ways," Rush Limbaugh said on the air. "He's either saying, 'Well, we're going to have to come up with our own ways to overcome them' or 'We're going to just have to wipe them out.' "

But the conservative response to Lott may be symptomatic of a broader disenchantment with the Republican Party, said Michael Harrison, editor and publisher of Talkers magazine, which chronicles talk radio. The immigration debate is a bellwether, he said, but conservative criticism is brewing on issues from education to spending to Iraq. Last week the magazine granted its annual Freedom of Speech Award to Savage for his criticism of President Bush, the first time Harrison can remember honoring a talk show host for speaking out against someone of his own political persuasion.

Republican politicians "assumed they owned conservative talk radio," Harrison said. "But support of conservatives by talk radio was only being borrowed as long as conservatives felt that Republicans served the conservative movement."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: amnesty; congress; noamnestyforillegals; rush; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Pontiac

That would be government of the elite, by the elite and for the elite.


21 posted on 06/24/2007 10:16:17 PM PDT by DaveyB (Ignorance is part of the human condition - atheism makes it permanent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 43north

I will most assuredly donate money to Graham’s primary opponent , if one emerges .


22 posted on 06/24/2007 10:20:48 PM PDT by Neu Pragmatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree
That gave me concern but when I heard him say we were not going to intimidate a United States Senator, it really made me mad!
Perhaps the State legislatures of several States could prevent some >cough...spit< esteemed Senators from returning to DC from their 4th of July vacation so they couldn't vote.
I wonder if the would be "intimidated" by that.
23 posted on 06/24/2007 10:22:16 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

the = they


24 posted on 06/24/2007 10:22:46 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
The return fire to that passing comment has been withering, as some of the nation's most prominent conservative talkers turn on a man they once defended adamantly.

There was a reason to defend Lott then. He was just saying something to bring a smile to the old guy on his 100th birthday. Remember the uproar? Remember how many times he apologized? Over and over and over again? Yes, he was defended by many (not just talk radio) over that, yet the dems still demanded his head on a platter and they GOT IT.

Now, it seems he's not the man we believed he was. Funny how that seems to be happening a great deal lately... His suckup to Feinstein today was pretty disgusting. Mr. Lott, when you kiss the a$$es of those who did their best to crucify you, and at the same time bash those who defended you, many of us are wondering....

What is your soul worth? Is it the highest bidder who decides?

25 posted on 06/24/2007 10:25:13 PM PDT by Just Lori (There is nothing "democratic" about Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

Put Lott in the dumpster : )


26 posted on 06/24/2007 10:28:54 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

It seems to me that any State with the power of recall for nonfeasance (intentionally and repeatedly not performing required duties of the office) would be able to retain and/or restrain a Senator.


27 posted on 06/24/2007 10:29:03 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
Why not propose legislation in plain English so that they could understand what they are voting on? Is that really too much to ask?

Why not one simple bill calling for a fence, admitting that no reform can take place until a garrisoned fence is in place and they can prove they secure the border?

Perhaps people get more and more dim, the longer they live in DC.
28 posted on 06/24/2007 10:29:11 PM PDT by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

““We’ve been down this road before — ‘no Catholics,’ ‘no Jews,’ ‘Irish need not apply,’ “ Graham said on ABC’s “This Week.”]”

Lindsey, you are headed for unemployed hell, you whore!


29 posted on 06/24/2007 10:32:29 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Wow - I haven’t seen the media this happy since ....well, ever...


30 posted on 06/24/2007 10:45:13 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

And .. the picture I get from these comments is that the WP is dancing in the ailes at their offices .. reveling in the pre-determined demise of the GOP.

The liberals always count their chickens before they hatch.


31 posted on 06/24/2007 10:49:29 PM PDT by CyberAnt (What is it about "ILLEGAL" that people don't understand ..??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just Lori

About the flap with Strom Thurmond you wrote.

“There was a reason to defend Lott then. He was just saying something to bring a smile to the old guy on his 100th birthday. Remember the uproar? Remember how many times he apologized? Over and over and over again? Yes, he was defended by many (not just talk radio) over that, yet the dems still demanded his head on a platter and they GOT IT.

Now, it seems he’s not the man we believed he was. Funny how that seems to be happening a great deal lately... His suckup to Feinstein today was pretty disgusting. Mr. Lott, when you kiss the a$$es of those who did their best to crucify you, and at the same time bash those who defended you, many of us are wondering....

What is your soul worth? Is it the highest bidder who decides?”

Would that all who are interested who live in his state send the above message. In my opinion his true “wimpism” (lack of cajones) became very obvious after the Thurmond gaff.


32 posted on 06/24/2007 11:00:28 PM PDT by Islander2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Islander2

You’re right! If he had just stood up to the idiots who made him a pinata, he wouldn’t have been hanging in the first place!


33 posted on 06/24/2007 11:07:13 PM PDT by Just Lori (There is nothing "democratic" about Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
It's not for nothing that every street named after Trent Lott is One Way.
34 posted on 06/24/2007 11:07:35 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
Guys and girls — it is truly a toss-up as to which despicable cretin I despise more — Harry Reid or Trent Lott.

One fact is dead certain: I have held that slick phony cheerleader from Ol’ Miss in total disdain for many more years than Searchlight Harry.

Both senators exemplify everything rotten to the core in Washington.

Rant regarding these turkeys NOT over. Just beginning !!

Have a great week, fellow Freepers.

35 posted on 06/24/2007 11:11:33 PM PDT by dk/coro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
As far as I’m concerned, the Republican party has just gone to warp 9 and hit a brick wall; they have all turned into democrats.

What this immigration amnesty bill has come down to, is two major political parties refusing to enforce the laws of the United States so they can pass a law that benefits both the parties but not the country of it’s citizens. THIS IS TREASON!

36 posted on 06/24/2007 11:18:28 PM PDT by Herakles (Diversity is code word for anti-white racism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
reveling in the pre-determined demise of the GOP.

Bush has the GOP on the ropes and for no particularly good reason, why in Gods name he would conspire with socialists to grant amnesty to illegal Mexicans at this time will be viewed as one of the truly greatest political mistakes of all time.

There is absoulotely no upside, he should have just kept the status quo and let the democrats take the heat for legalizing lawbreakers.

Between this idiocy and the fact that the GOP is already losing the 13% black/ 3% homo/ 2% jew /and 30% women in every election all they need to do is lose Florida and Hillary and Obama will be in the White House in 2008.

I'd say the Enemedia optimism is well founded.

37 posted on 06/24/2007 11:26:48 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Herakles
Its pretty clear that a Clinton/Obama ticket will beat the GOP unless the GOP gets the same percentage of hispanic votes that Bush received in 2004.

Its also pretty clear that the GOP will not be getting the same percentage of Hispanic votes Bush received in 2004.

This unnecessary and ill advised legislation has "alienated" a large percentage of legal hispanic voters who supported Bush last time but can't get past foaming at the mouth Tancredo types who they perceive to be racist.

Doubtful the GOP will be able to win both Texas and Florida this time, odds are good for a President Hillary and Vice President Obama in the White House.

38 posted on 06/24/2007 11:47:45 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
I'm a conservative before I'm a Republican. My support of the Republican Party is not unconditional. If it turns its back on us, we won't be there when it needs us. That is, if the GOP elite are listening to conservatives.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

39 posted on 06/24/2007 11:53:56 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

97.3 here in Jackson is giving Lott hell and Lott hates it. I think that is why he made that anti-talk radio remark.

SHUT THE HELL UP LOTT, AND WORK FOR YOUR CONSTITUENTS!

(And not the chicken farms that hire illegal aliens in Mississippi)


40 posted on 06/25/2007 12:03:51 AM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson