Posted on 06/26/2007 10:55:31 AM PDT by hardback
Exactly!
Conservatives are united against this bill.
If Bush thinks he can team up with Kennedy and ram this bill down our throat and then come back later and talk about how bad the Democrats are, he has truly lost his mind.
“....many analysts believe that there could be political consequences.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I’ve just returned from the county bored of the electeds office where I’ve tendered the severance of my affiliation with the Republican party.
Leaders of the GOP have worked hard to drive my affection from the party of Ronald Reagan, but alas, have succeeded most thoroughly to that end...
Congratulations.
If Bush thinks, he has truly lost his mind.
Again, here is another propaganda technique employed by aliberal, in this case a RINO.
Appendix 1 PSYOP Ops. Field Manual No. 33-1:
Obtain Disapproval Technique: This technique is used to get the audience to disapprove of an action or idea by suggesting the idea is popular with groups hated, feared, or held in contempt by the target audience. Thus, if a group which supports a policy is led to believe that undesirable, subversive, or contemptible people also support it, the members of the group might decide to change their positions.
Lindsey and his cohorts have basically called all who appose the bill racists.
Please don’t feed the animals. :^)
Dane is a flea, its just I think we need to start small and work up to rino wacking one step at a time. The LaRaza elite from DC should pay the price.
Last night Glenn Beck said Bush was in bed with big business, who want the bill passed for cheap labor. Democrats think Latinos will vote for them and if the bill fails, are hoping it fails in the senate and not the house...where they hold the majority. Glenn also said Bush was planning to slip key provisions of the bill — if it fails — into other, urgently needed legislation, such as war funding. Talk about stabbed in the back.
Administration officials that believe this will win the Latino vote for the republicans are crazy.
Look how many black votes the President has won with his overt pandering since the No Child Left Behind act in his first year. He probably has actually lost black votes.
California used to be a Republican state before the 1986 Amnesty - now look how many Latinos vote republican there.
A little history:
Back in the day Republicans supported Hawaiian statehood because they believed the state would go republican.
Once Hawaii became a state the voters jumped solidly into the democrat camp where they have remained ever since.
The common people have a better feel for what will really happen when this bill is signed than all the President’s high priced republican Yes Men put together.
Agreed. I just wanted to make sure you knew about Dane. Flea. I like that!
Happy FReeping!
i am guessin that you have not seen roil until mark levin gets on the air - i like that he gives out phone numbers for capitol hill and posts e/mail addresses on his web site
rage is good and all - but giving us specific steps (other than just saying to vote or ‘get involved’) is what some of us sheep need - it seems to have an effect - at least as far as having some of the repubicans knittin buttonholes with their booty holes (lol - got that from an old east texan) - hopefully we will keep getting specifics and can make a difference in next convention and election
There. . .fixed it.
Good question. My answer is that until we have non-secret voting which may be coming, a number of Democrats in both Red and Blue States will vote for a LEADER, that is a candidate who stresses a limited and simple platform: (1) Close the borders in the name of security, (2) English becomes the national language and all official documents including ballots are only in English, (3)There is right and there is wrong. We don’t want to be slaves to PC when PC causes wrong to trump right. So so-called ‘multi-culturalism’ is not right for America. ‘American’ is right for America and our freedom depends on it.
Could this all have been a giant communist conspiracy to destroy the conservative movement? They’re masters of infiltration. Could they have infiltrated the republican party just so at the critical time they could spike it, and shatter it into a million pieces? Or has the checked-pants country club wing just suddenly felt so liberated they think they can safely tell the conservatives to go to hell? If that’s they case they’re going to be in the boat that the queers and liberals (but I repeat myself) are going to find themselves in when al-queda takes over. Dead.
The pattern is the self-hating secular jewish communists in Russia before the revolution. Oh! Many of the ones doing it now are their great grandchildren.
Screw it. The world is slouching toward a time of bleak barbarianism and there’s nothing anyone can do about it. There’s only one way this century can outdo last century in terms of bloodiness. I leave it to you to figure out what that is.
At least we can use this bill to flesh out the RINO’s like Sam Brownback
It is the case in all states that are subject to the US Constitution. Is your state?
Just say NO to Illegal Alien Amnesty!! Keep calling!! It’s NOT OVER!!
U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121
U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121
White House comments: (202) 456-1111
Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep
Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Toll free to the US Senate:
1-800-882-2005. (Spanish number)
1-800-417-7666. (English number)
Courtesy of a pro-amnesty group, no less!!
See Article 21 of the Colorado State Constitution
I don't have to see it. The US Constitution governs the election, term and termination of US Senators and Representatives. State reps and officials are subject to state law, but federal elected officials are not. This was recently reaffirmed in cases involving state term limits laws. I am for term limits, and I would support recall laws to get rid of bad Senators, but unfortunately, the US Constitution does not let a state impose such burdens on the officeholder. It is probably the correct interpretation, too, it's not one of the areas where the Supreme Court has overstepped its bounds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.